Who regulates what
European payments are regulated at three institutional levels. The European Union sets the framework through its directives and regulations, and through the EBA's technical standards. National authorities license and supervise payment firms, while central banks oversee infrastructures and payment instruments. France adds an oversight body of its own, the OSMP.
From PSD1 to PSD2: opening up the market
PSD1 (Directive 2007/64/EC, transposed into French law in 2009) laid the foundations of the single market for payments. It created the payment institution license, ending the banks' monopoly on payment services. It also set the legal basis for SEPA, with common rules on execution, timelines and liability. That license opened the way for Europe's first non-bank PSPs.
PSD2 (Directive 2015/2366, in force since January 13, 2018) extended the framework to access to bank accounts themselves. It created two new regulated activities: payment initiation (PISP) and account information (AISP). Banks must serve both through dedicated APIs, and cannot require the third-party provider to sign a contract first. European regulatory open banking grew out of this obligation.
- Strong customer authentication (SCA) required for account access and electronic payments (covered in the next section).
- Limits on charges: a ban on surcharging consumer card payments (Art. 62), and SHA (shared) charges by default within the EU.
- Stronger liability rules: the cardholder's maximum loss cut from €150 to €50, refunds of unauthorized transactions by D+1, and the burden of proof shifted to the PSP.
- A narrower commercial agent exemption, which sent a regulatory shockwave through marketplaces (see the merchant-acquirer-PSP topic).
- Stronger passporting and an EBA register: coordinated supervision of pan-European firms.
SCA: strong customer authentication
SCA (Strong Customer Authentication) requires at least two independent factors from three categories: knowledge (PIN, password), possession (an enrolled phone, a card) and inherence (biometrics). The EBA's RTS that implement it have applied since September 14, 2019. France completed its e-commerce migration plan in 2021. In practice, French online card payments run on 3-D Secure v2: the cardholder approves in their banking app with biometrics, or with a one-time code combined with a password.
| Exemption | Conditions | Limit | Who bears the fraud loss? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-value payment (LVP) | €30 or less, with counters: at most 5 transactions or €100 cumulative since the last SCA | 30 € | The issuer (if it grants the exemption) |
| Transaction risk analysis (TRA) | Requesting PSP's fraud rate below the regulatory thresholds | €100 (rate ≤ 0.13%), €250 (≤ 0.06%), €500 (≤ 0.01%) | The PSP applying the exemption |
| Trusted beneficiary | Merchant added by the cardholder to an allowlist held by their bank | None | The issuer |
| Recurring payments | Fixed amount: SCA on the first transaction only | None | Depends on the initial transaction |
| MITs (merchant-initiated transactions) | Out of SCA scope: transactions the merchant initiates without the cardholder (variable-amount subscriptions, for example), backed by an authenticated mandate | – | The merchant, if the cardholder disputes |
| MOTO / anonymous cards | Mail and telephone orders: out of scope | – | The merchant |
From 2023 to 2026, fraud shifted toward manipulating the customer directly. Phone spoofing by fake bank advisers, CEO fraud and fake delivery links all fall into this category, in which the victim personally authenticates the transaction they later dispute. The PSD3/PSR package plans a response: refunds when a fraudster impersonates bank staff, fraud data sharing between PSPs, and obligations for telecom operators and online platforms.
The Interchange Fee Regulation (IFR, 2015)
Regulation (EU) 2015/751 of April 29, 2015 (the Interchange Fee Regulation) directly regulates the price of interchange in the four-party model. Before it, interchange was set collectively and acted as a price floor passed on to merchants. EU lawmakers capped it for consumer cards: 0.2% of the amount for debit cards and 0.3% for credit cards. The caps have applied since December 9, 2015.
- Separation of scheme and processing (Art. 7): schemes must keep brand management and transaction processing separate, in their accounts and their organization, to open processing to competition.
- Brand choice on co-badged cards (Art. 8): neither the scheme nor the issuer can impose routing; the merchant and the cardholder each have a say. This is the cornerstone that lets Cartes Bancaires (CB), France's domestic card scheme, coexist with Visa and Mastercard.
- A looser “honor all cards” rule (Art. 10): a merchant can accept a brand's debit cards without having to accept its credit or commercial cards (acceptance remains bundled within each category).
- Transparency (Arts. 9 and 12): billing itemized by card category (unblending) at the merchant's request, and transaction-level information.
| Before the IFR (2014) | After the IFR (2016+) | |
|---|---|---|
| Interchange | ≈ €0.50 to €1.00, depending on the country | €0.30 max |
| Typical total MSC | ≈ 0,90-1,20 € | ≈ 0,50-0,80 € |
| Who gains from the cut | – | Merchants (pass-through to consumers is debated) |
The Instant Payments Regulation (2024)
Regulation (EU) 2024/886 of March 13, 2024, the Instant Payments Regulation, entered into force on April 8, 2024. It turns instant credit transfers from a commercial option into a legal obligation for every EU PSP that offers standard credit transfers. SCT Inst, the EPC scheme launched in 2017, makes funds available in under 10 seconds, 24/7/365. The regulation tackles two long-standing obstacles: reachability, since not every bank could receive instant transfers, and price, often around €1 per instant transfer in France before the regulation.
| Deadline | Obligation | Who is affected |
|---|---|---|
| January 9, 2025 | Receive instant credit transfers + price no higher than a standard transfer | Euro-area PSPs |
| October 9, 2025 | Send instant credit transfers + Verification of Payee (VoP) on all credit transfers + daily sanctions screening (instead of per transaction) | Euro-area PSPs |
| January 9, 2027 | Receive + price parity | PSPs in member states outside the euro area |
| July 9, 2027 | Send + VoP | PSPs in member states outside the euro area |
POST /verification-of-payee HTTP/1.1
Host: api.payee-bank.example
{
"iban": "FR7630004000050000123456789",
"name": "SARL DUPONT ET FILS" <- name entered by the payer
}
--> 200 OK
{
"result": "CLOSE_MATCH", <- near match
"matched_name": "DUPONT & FILS SARL" <- actual name, shown to the payer
}
// MATCH : transfer goes through with no friction
// CLOSE_MATCH: payer confirms, knowing the name differs
// NO_MATCH : strong warning; if the payer overrides it, their liability growsThe effects of this mandate ripple through the whole ecosystem. Now universal and priced no higher than a standard transfer, the instant credit transfer becomes a payment rail that competes with cards in e-commerce, which is the premise behind Wero. It also underpins payment requests (Request-to-Pay) and is the likely foundation for the digital euro the ECB is preparing. For corporate treasurers, it changes cash management: payroll can be paid as it falls due, and refunds go out instantly.
PSD3/PSR and the 2026–2028 outlook
The Commission presented its package revising PSD2 on June 28, 2023. It centers on a PSD3 directive, refocused on licensing and supervising payment firms, and a directly applicable PSR (Payment Services Regulation) that takes over most conduct rules: SCA, user rights and open banking. The package folds the e-money regime (EMD2) into the payment services framework, and the EMI license is set to be absorbed.
- Fighting manipulation fraud: refunds, under conditions, for customers deceived by fraudsters impersonating their bank (spoofing); fraud data sharing between PSPs; an extended VoP.
- Stronger open banking: API performance and availability requirements, a consent dashboard for users, and a ban on unjustified obstacles (frictions). No single technical standard is imposed, but outcomes are mandated.
- Access for PIs and EMIs to payment systems and central bank accounts: a response to banks de-risking fintechs (with regulated access to infrastructures such as TARGET).
- SCA fine-tuned: clarifications on exemptions, on outsourcing authentication (delegating it to wallets), and on accessibility for users without a smartphone.
- In parallel: the FIDA regulation (access to financial data beyond payment accounts, such as savings, insurance and credit), plus DORA (digital operational resilience, applicable since January 2025) and MiCA for crypto-assets, including payment stablecoins, coming into application.
Elsewhere in the world. The same mechanism, elsewhere.
Regulatory caps on interchange
In the US, the Federal Reserve's Regulation II (the Durbin Amendment) caps only debit interchange, and only for issuers with at least $10 billion in assets: $0.21 per transaction plus 0.05% of the amount, plus a $0.01 fraud-prevention adjustment for eligible issuers. Credit card interchange is not regulated.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/regii-average-interchange-fee.htm
In Australia, the Reserve Bank of Australia sets the caps. Its March 2026 Conclusions Paper lowers two caps from October 1, 2026: domestic consumer credit cards to 0.30%, and debit and prepaid cards to 8 cents or 0.16% (down from 10 cents or 0.20%). Commercial cards stay at 0.80%, and foreign-issued cards acquired in Australia will be capped at 1.0% from April 1, 2027.
https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/review-of-retail-payments-regulation/2026-03/conclusions-paper/interchange-fees.html
In Brazil, Resolução BCB nº 246 of September 26, 2022, has capped the interchange fee (tarifa de intercâmbio) at 0.5% of the amount for debit cards and 0.7% for prepaid cards since April 1, 2023. It replaced the earlier regime, which combined a maximum weighted average with a maximum value per transaction, and it aligned the timelines for paying out funds to merchants.
Banco Central do Brasil, Resolução BCB nº 246, September 26, 2022
India did not cap interchange; it abolished the merchant fee altogether. Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act 2007, inserted by the Finance Act 2019, has banned any charge to the merchant or the payer on UPI payments and RuPay debit cards since January 1, 2020. The result is a zero MDR, funded by a government incentive paid to the banks and payment companies involved.
Payment and Settlement Systems Act 2007, s. 10A (inserted by the Finance Act 2019); Income-tax Act 1961, s. 269SU
Mandatory strong authentication for electronic payments
India's equivalent of SCA, the Additional Factor of Authentication (AFA), predates the European rules. The Reserve Bank of India imposed it in 2009 and overhauled it with the Authentication Mechanisms for Digital Payment Transactions Directions, published on September 25, 2025, and applicable from April 1, 2026. The Directions require at least one factor to be generated dynamically for each transaction, and extend AFA to cross-border card-not-present payments when the foreign merchant or acquirer requests it.
https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/PressRelease/PDFs/PR1165D250AB0389BE4D3D9E006CECD26F928E.PDF
The UK kept strong customer authentication after Brexit. It is still required by the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the UK SCA-RTS, which the FCA has applied since September 14, 2019, with the same set of exemptions, including the contactless point-of-sale exemption in Article 11 of the RTS.
https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/strong-customer-authentication
In the US, no federal rule mandates strong authentication; consumers are protected through liability rules instead. Regulation E (12 CFR 1005.6) caps a consumer's loss at $50 if they report a lost or stolen access device within two business days of discovering the loss, and at $500 after that. The cap disappears for transactions that occur more than 60 days after the statement is sent.
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1005/6/
Mandatory instant credit transfers and their pricing
In Brazil, the Banco Central made Pix participation mandatory for every authorized institution with more than 500,000 active customer accounts (Resolução BCB nº 1/2020). Resolução BCB nº 19/2020 then barred institutions from charging individuals and sole proprietors any Pix fee for sending or receiving transfers. Free Pix is a regulatory requirement there, not a commercial offer.
Banco Central do Brasil, Resolução BCB nº 1 of August 12, 2020, and Resolução BCB nº 19 of October 1, 2020
In India, UPI, operated by the National Payments Corporation of India, runs around the clock, and its zero cost is written into law: since January 1, 2020, Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act 2007 has banned any fee charged to the payer or the payee of a UPI payment. The debate over reinstating an MDR for large merchants reopened in 2026.
Payment and Settlement Systems Act 2007, s. 10A (inserted by the Finance Act 2019)
In the US, the Federal Reserve launched FedNow on July 20, 2023, with 35 financial institutions, but participation is voluntary: no law requires a bank to receive or send instant payments, or to price them in line with standard transfers. More than 1,500 institutions were on the service by summer 2025.
https://www.frbservices.org/news/fed360/issues/071625/fednow-service-two-years-growth-innovation