Reference🏛️ The payments ecosystemIntermediate⏱ 16 min read

🌐 Payment schemes

CB, Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Europe’s domestic schemes, and the EPI/Wero project: who sets the rules, routes transactions, and clears the flows.

What is a scheme?

A scheme (a card payment system or network) is the organization that provides the framework that lets issuers and acquirers interoperate. In the four-party model, it issues no cards and signs up no merchants: its members do both. Three functions define it: a set of rules binding on its members, a technical infrastructure for routing and clearing, and a licensing system that controls who can issue and acquire under its brand.

  • Rules: acceptance conditions, security requirements (EMV, and PCI DSS through the PCI SSC), dispute and chargeback rules (reason codes, time limits, arbitration), and brand requirements (logo display).
  • Routing: authorization switches route each message to the right issuer based on the BIN, with availability requirements close to 99.99%.
  • Clearing and settlement: calculating net positions, applying interchange automatically, and sending settlement instructions to settlement banks.
  • Licenses: an issuing license (the right to put cards bearing the brand into circulation) and an acquiring license (the right to sign up merchants), held either as a principal member or as an affiliate sponsored by a principal.
  • Shared innovation: network tokenization (VTS at Visa, MDES at Mastercard), 3-D Secure, contactless standards, and Click to Pay.
The scheme in a transaction: the invisible conductor
Acquirer
Sends the authorization request to the scheme’s switch
Scheme
Identifies the issuer (BIN), applies the rules, routes the message
Stand-in processing available if the issuer is unavailable
Issuer
Responds; the scheme logs the response and passes it back
Scheme
At the end of the cycle: multilateral net clearing and settlement instructions
Interchange is calculated automatically
🔑
A scheme sells trust
A scheme gives its members a settlement guarantee: any transaction that complies with the rules will be settled. That systemic guarantee, backed by a dispute resolution process, is what justifies scheme fees and gives these networks their central position. It also explains why central banks oversee them, which the ECB does in the euro area under its PISA framework.

CB: France’s domestic scheme

The GIE Cartes Bancaires (CB) is France’s domestic card scheme, created in 1984 by the country’s major banks. It is one of the strongest domestic schemes in the world. It was built on the principle of full interbank interoperability: any CB card works at any CB merchant, whatever the issuing bank. As a result, France built a single national network, while other countries kept fragmented systems.

1984
GIE Cartes Bancaires founded
GIE CB
≈ 76M
CB cards in circulation
GIE CB, 2024
> 15B
Annual CB transactions (payments and withdrawals)
GIE CB, 2024
≈ 2.5M
CB merchants and acceptance points
GIE CB
  • Member-run governance: CB is an economic interest grouping (GIE) run by its members: the traditional banks and, since the market was opened by regulation, payment institutions and e-money institutions. It does not seek profit for itself: rules and pricing are set collectively (under the oversight of the Autorité de la concurrence).
  • Near-universal co-badging: almost every CB card also carries an international brand (Visa or Mastercard). In France, transactions are routed to CB by default; abroad, they go over the international network.
  • Low interchange: under pressure from the Autorité de la concurrence (2011 commitments that cut the fee to 0.28%) and then from the IFR, CB interchange is among the lowest in Europe, a structural cost advantage for French merchants.
  • Infrastructure: authorizations over the CB network, clearing through CORE(FR) operated by STET; a long-standing pioneer in security (France rolled out chip and PIN nationwide in the early 1990s, ahead of the rest of the world).
Co-badged cardone chip, two applicationsCB · A0000000421010Visa · A0000000031010Mastercard · A0000000041010AIDs on the chipApplication selectionPPSE: candidate list, priority orderCB routingdomestic networkVisa/Mastercard routinginternational networkmerchant prioritycardholder’s choiceinterchange capped (IFR)domestic scheme feessame interchangeinternational scheme feestypical extra cost: +0.05 to +0.15 pp of MSCThe cardholder has the final say (IFR art. 8, since June 9, 2016); the merchant only sets which brand is shown first.
ℹ️
Brand choice at the terminal
Under the IFR (Article 8), on a co-badged card the merchant can set a preferred brand and the cardholder can override that choice at checkout. In practice, French terminals route to CB by default, since it costs the merchant less. The cardholder can force Visa or Mastercard through the terminal menu or their wallet. How this routing is configured shapes competition between schemes, because every percentage point of routing share moves tens of millions of euros in fees.
⚠️
The fragility of the domestic model
CB’s model depends on co-badging, since nearly all its cards carry a second, international brand. If issuers switched to Visa-only or Mastercard-only cards, as banks have done in several European countries, the domestic scheme would lose its footing. The Dutch Maestro precedent and the domestic schemes that have already disappeared show what can happen: Laser in Ireland, and PIN in the Netherlands, which was replaced by Maestro and then by Mastercard and Visa debit. Today’s pressure points are wallets such as Apple Pay, and e-commerce, where the international brands are better integrated.

Visa and Mastercard: the global networks

Visa and Mastercard are two global schemes that grew out of bank associations: BankAmericard in 1958 for Visa, and Interbank/Master Charge in 1966 for Mastercard. Both later went public, Mastercard in 2006 and Visa in 2008. Visa Europe, which had remained a bank-owned cooperative, was acquired by Visa Inc. in 2016 for about €21 billion. This shift from a member-owned to a shareholder-owned model partly explains why scheme fees have kept rising over the past 15 years.

VisaMastercard
Cards in circulation≈ 4.5 billion≈ 3.5 billion
ModelPublic company (NYSE), formerly a bank associationPublic company (NYSE), formerly a bank association
Debit brandsVisa Debit, V PAY (being phased out)Debit Mastercard, Maestro (phased out since 2023)
Network tokenizationVTS (Visa Token Service)MDES (Mastercard Digital Enablement Service)
Fraud monitoring programsVAMP (Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program)ECP (Excessive Chargeback Program)
Visa vs. Mastercard (global orders of magnitude, 2025)
  • Licenses: issuers and acquirers need a license for each territory and each activity. A principal member deals directly with the scheme and settles in its own name; an affiliate/associate operates under a principal’s sponsorship.
  • Fees: assessments (in basis points on volume), per-transaction processing fees, optional fees (tokenization, data, fraud services), and a whole arsenal of behavior-based fees (poor data quality, excessive representment rates, and so on).
  • De facto standard setters: their rules (published, several hundred pages each) and timelines (3DS cutover dates, the Maestro sunset, the 8-digit BIN migration in 2022) apply to the entire global ecosystem.
⚠️
Scheme fee inflation
Unlike interchange, scheme fees are not capped by the IFR. Several regulators have taken up this gap. The UK’s PSR documented an increase of more than 30% in real terms over 2017–2022, with no matching improvement in service. The European Commission reopened the issue as part of its IFR review. For merchants, scheme fees now often exceed interchange on intra-European transactions.

Amex, Diners, JCB, UnionPay: the other models

Several networks coexist with Visa and Mastercard under different models. American Express, focused on the premium segment and business travel, and Diners Club, a 1950 pioneer now part of Discover, operate as three-party closed loops, sometimes combined with local licensing. JCB in Japan and UnionPay in China, the world’s largest network by number of cards, are four-party schemes. Both are deeply entrenched at home, and their international acceptance is concentrated along tourist corridors.

NetworkModelWhen to accept itIndicative merchant cost
American ExpressThree-party (hybrid through licensees)Business, travel, premium customers1.5% to 3%
UnionPayFour-party (China)Tourist areas, luxury, duty-freeVaries; dedicated acquiring agreements
JCBFour-party (Japan)Japanese and Asian touristsOften through agreements with European acquirers
Discover/DinersThree-party with a network of alliancesMarginal in FranceVaries
Non-European networks: footprint and relevance for a French merchant
ℹ️
Merchants almost always accept these networks through their usual PSP or acquirer, which aggregates the contracts. Accepting Amex is therefore an economic decision rather than a technical one. It comes down to weighing the higher cost of acceptance against the extra revenue from Amex cardholders’ larger average ticket. In hospitality and travel, the math usually favors acceptance.

Europe’s domestic schemes

A domestic scheme is a national card network whose rules and governance are controlled by the banks of a single country. Several European countries still have one, almost always co-badged with Visa or Mastercard for international transactions. These systems share the same strengths: low costs, local governance, and a close fit with the national market. They also share the same weakness: dependence on co-badging and underinvestment in e-commerce.

SchemeCountryDomestic positionDistinctive feature
Cartes Bancaires (CB)FranceDefault network for almost all payment cardsFull interbank interoperability since 1984; open to PIs and EMIs
girocardGermany≈ 100 million cards; dominant in storesLong absent from e-commerce; the traditional Maestro co-badge was replaced after Maestro’s withdrawal
BancontactBelgiumMajority of Belgian card paymentsMerged with Payconiq (mobile app); very high uptake of domestic mobile payments
DankortDenmarkLong-standing national schemeCo-badged Visa/Dankort; facing head-on competition from mobile (MobilePay)
PagobancomatItalyDomestic debit networkRuns on the Bancomat network; digital expansion projects underway
MultibancoPortugalNational network (cards plus a very dense ATM network)Services beyond payments (bill payments, MB references)
Main European domestic schemes (2026)
⚠️
Lessons from the schemes that disappeared
Several European domestic schemes disappeared or declined because they failed to keep up with e-commerce and mobile payments, including PIN in the Netherlands, Laser in Ireland, and Switch and Solo in the UK. Their traffic moved to the international brands, which were better established in those new channels. The prospect of a European payments market with no European player of its own led to the creation of EPI.

EPI and Wero: Europe’s bid

The European Payments Initiative (EPI) is a project for a pan-European payment network, launched in 2020 by 16 major banks from France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain. It has political backing from the ECB and the European Commission. The card component was dropped in 2022, for lack of consensus among members and because of the cost of replacing domestic schemes. EPI then shifted to Wero, an account-to-account payment wallet built on SEPA Instant Credit Transfer.

July 2020
EPI founded
16 founding banks, headquartered in Brussels. Initial ambition: a European card plus a wallet.
2022
Card project dropped
Several banks (notably Spanish ones) pull out. EPI refocuses on an account-to-account wallet.
2023
iDEAL and Payconiq acquired
EPI acquires the Dutch scheme iDEAL (Currence) and Luxembourg’s Payconiq, along with their technology and existing users.
July 2024
Wero launches for P2P
Germany first, then Belgium and France (October 2024). Money sent by phone number and settled by instant credit transfer.
2025
Expansion into e-commerce
First rollouts of Wero for e-commerce (led by Belgium and Germany); gradual migration from iDEAL to Wero in the Netherlands.
2026-2027
Next stop: the point of sale
In-store payments, recurring payments, and BNPL features are planned: the real test against cards.
> 15M
Registered Wero users claimed in early 2026 (through banking apps)
EPI, 2026 statement
3
Markets live at launch: Germany, France, Belgium (the Netherlands through the iDEAL migration)
EPI
10 s
Funds available to the payee: the promise of the underlying instant credit transfer
SCT Inst scheme
  • Model: Wero is not a card. No card interchange, no Visa or Mastercard in the loop. Settlement is an SCT Inst between bank accounts, while EPI runs the scheme layer (rules, directory, dispute resolution).
  • Distribution through banks: Wero is built into the banking apps of its shareholder banks (and is also available as a standalone app), a decisive enrollment advantage over fintechs.
  • Challenges: building merchant acceptance against universally accepted cards, creating economics that work for banks (instant settlement carries no interchange), and holding its own against Apple Pay and PayPal on user experience.
  • Favorable backdrop: the EU Instant Payments Regulation (2024) makes the underlying rail universal, at a price no higher than a standard transfer. The infrastructure Wero runs on is now a legal requirement for every bank.
🔑
What to watch
Three indicators will show how Wero progresses through 2027–2028. The first is the share of e-commerce it captures in its pilot markets: iDEAL, with ≈ 70% of Dutch e-commerce, shows that an account-to-account scheme can dominate a market. The second is the merchant business case, which Wero still has to make against card MSCs that are already low in Europe. The third is real traction at the point of sale, where cards and NFC wallets benefit from cardholder habit and minimal friction.