Reference🌏 Payments in Asia-PacificIntermediate⏱ 30 min read

🇯🇵 Payments in Japan and Korea

Zengin and its fixed-length record format, JCB, CAFIS and 2.88% interchange, Suica and FeliCa, the QR war PayPay won, konbini payments, the KFTC and Korean open banking, VANs, and a credit card that merchants are legally required to accept

Two markets that could hardly be more different

Japan and South Korea are two separate payment markets, with no shared currency, regulator, or infrastructure. They are East Asia's two most advanced economies, and their payment markets are the most different in the region, because their acceptance systems were built on opposite principles. Korea industrialized the credit card to the point where accepting it is a legal obligation and the card itself is a tax policy tool. Japan spent 30 years with a cashless payment ratio that was low for a country so wealthy. It only shifted from 2018 onward, driven by a government subsidy and a private cashback war. The two markets share one trait that shapes any foreign company's entry. Their domestic rails are closed and old, and there is no way around them. No international acquiring contract, on its own, gives access to local acceptance.

58,0 %
cashless payment ratio in Japan in 2025, on ¥162.7 trillion, vs. 52.8% in 2024 on the same measure
METI, “2025年のキャッシュレス決済比率を算出しました,” March 31, 2026
82,7 %
credit cards' share of Japanese cashless payments in 2025 (¥134.6 trillion of ¥162.7 trillion)
METI, March 31, 2026
₩3.6T/day
average daily payment card spending in Korea in 2025 (+4.7% year over year)
Bank of Korea, “2025년중 국내 지급결제동향,” March 30, 2026
79,5 %
credit cards' (후불형) share of Korean payment card spending in 2025, at ₩2.9 trillion a day
Bank of Korea, March 30, 2026
⚠️
Handle Japan's “cashless” figure with care: METI changed its indicator
Through 2024, METI published an international comparison indicator, the source of the 42.8% figure for 2024 that is still widely quoted. Since its March 31, 2026, release, METI has also calculated a broader national indicator, which gives 58.0% for 2025 and 52.8% for 2024 on a recalculated basis. Both series are valid, and they cover different scopes. The government target of 65% by 2030, along with a longer-term goal of 80%, is set on the new indicator. Comparing 42.8% with 58% pits two differently built measures against each other, and the gap between them says nothing about market growth.
JapanSouth Korea
Central bank / regulatorBank of Japan (BoJ); FSA for licensing, METI for cashless policy and the 割賦販売法 (Installment Sales Act)Bank of Korea (BOK); FSC for regulation, FSS for supervision
Retail credit transfer railZengin System (Zengin-Net, 1973), 24/7 since 2018KFTC, 전자금융공동망 / 타행환 (1989), near-instant from the start
RTGSBOJ-NET (1988), Bank of JapanBOK-Wire+ (1994), Bank of Korea
Domestic card schemeJCB (1961), an international scheme born in Japan; J-Debit, now marginalBC Card (1982) plus nine issuing card companies; no homegrown international scheme
Card switchingCAFIS (NTT Data, 1984) and CARDNET (1995), two competing switchesPrivate VAN layer (value-added networks: Nice, KIS, KICC, Smartro) between terminal and issuer
Merchant feeUnregulated, with high published interchange (up to 2.88% in Visa's general category)Capped by law (여신전문금융업법), reviewed periodically by the FSC
Refusing cardsAllowed: many businesses remain cash-onlyProhibited: a member merchant can neither refuse the card nor set a minimum amount
Leading contactless technologyFeliCa (NFC-F), with Suica, iD, and QUICPay, alongside EMV contactlessEMV contactless, after years dominated by Samsung Pay's MST and the magnetic stripe
Leading walletPayPay (SoftBank / LY Corporation)Kakao Pay, Naver Pay, Toss, Samsung Pay
Japan vs. Korea for a business that needs to accept payments

The two markets differ in what it costs to enter them. In Japan, cards are the dominant payment method but acceptance is fragmented across two switches, two proprietary NFC rails, about ten e-money brands, and four QR wallets. The integration cost there is a cost of coverage. In Korea, acceptance is unified but the intermediary layer is mandatory: a VAN for in-person payments, a PG (payment gateway) online, and regulation that sets the price. Korea's integration cost is a cost of compliance and local contracting.

Japan's interbank rails: Zengin, BOJ-NET, and the rest

The Zengin System (全銀システム) clears retail credit transfers in Japan. It went live in 1973 and was crediting payees in near real time 40 years before the term instant payment caught on. It is operated by the Japanese Banks' Payment Clearing Network, Zengin-Net (全国銀行資金決済ネットワーク), licensed under the Payment Services Act since September 2010. The system handles about 6.5 million transactions a day, worth nearly ¥12 trillion (Zengin-Net, official “Clearing of Funds” page, accessed in 2026). Two later changes extended it, one in time and one in membership. The Zengin More Time System, launched in 2018, made it available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Access for nonbank payment providers (資金移動業者, funds transfer service providers) has been opening up gradually since 2022, and the first actual membership was approved in an announcement dated October 17, 2024.

SystemOfficial nameOperatorSinceRole
Zengin System全銀システムZengin-Net (全国銀行資金決済ネットワーク)1973Near-real-time retail transfers, 24/7 since 2018, with about 6.5 million transactions and ¥12 trillion a day
BOJ-NET日銀ネット (BOJ-NET Funds Transfer System)Bank of Japan1988The yen RTGS and the final settlement asset for every other system; rebuilt as “Next-Generation RTGS” in 2008–2011
FXYCS外国為替円決済制度Tokyo Bankers Association, running on BOJ-NET1980Yen leg of FX transactions and cross-border payments, about ¥17 trillion per business day in 2018 (Bank of Japan)
Cotraことら送金Cotra Inc. (株式会社ことら)2022Interbank P2P up to ¥100,000, free, addressed by phone number or email, on a dedicated low-value line of the Zengin System
Densai Netでんさいネット (全銀電子債権ネットワーク)Zengin Electronic Monetary Claims Network Co., Ltd. (JBA)2013Electronically recorded monetary claims (電子記録債権) replacing paper bills: ¥50.09 trillion in requests and 569,854 registered companies (densai.net, 2025)
電子交換所Electronic Clearing HouseJapanese Bankers Association2022Nationwide image-based clearing of bills and checks; shutdown announced for April 2027 (Nikkei, 2025)
統合ATMスイッチングIntegrated ATM Switching ServiceNTT Data2004Links the ATM networks of the banking associations; has also handled payee account verification before transfers since 2005
Japan’s interbank infrastructure and who runs it
🔑
The ¥100 million threshold
A transfer of ¥100 million or more does not clear through Zengin. It is routed to BOJ-NET, where settlement is gross and in real time, across the accounts banks hold at the Bank of Japan. The switch changes how the payment is executed: the calendar, operating hours, and cost of gross settlement differ from those of retail clearing. Japanese treasury setups and B2B flows therefore treat the two regimes on either side of the threshold separately.

Three projects documented in Zengin-Net announcements will shape the coming years. The first is the go-live schedule for the next-generation system (“次期全銀システムの稼動予定時期について,” October 17, 2024). The second is the launch of an API gateway (“APIゲートウェイの稼動について,” November 25, 2025). The third is the planned closure of the 電子交換所 (electronic clearing house) in April 2027, which will complete the disappearance of paper bills and checks in Japan. That deadline caps a shift whose previous stage is already done. Japan's 179 local clearing houses (手形交換所), in operation since 1879, shut down on November 2, 2022, and clearing moved to the 電子交換所 on November 4, 2022. With the 電子交換所 now closing too, companies whose B2B settlements still rely on paper bills face a hard deadline to migrate.

⚠️
The October 2023 outage: a national rail can go down
From October 10 to 12, 2023, a failure in the Zengin System's relay equipment halted transfers at several member banks. The incident led to a series of official notices (“全国銀行データ通信システムの不具合について,” updates 2 to 4, then a restoration notice) and to an industrywide agreement on customer compensation, published on October 18, 2023. Zengin-Net said it had received orders to report (報告徴求命令) from the FSA on October 13 and December 18, 2023. The episode showed that a bulk payment flow routed only through Zengin transfers stays blocked for as long as the system is down. A Japanese payer therefore needs a second settlement channel for business continuity.

The Zengin format: 120 bytes, katakana, and no names in kanji or Latin script

The Zengin format (全銀フォーマット) governs the credit transfer and direct debit files a company exchanges with its bank in Japan. It uses fixed-length, 120-byte records, a legacy of the magnetic tape era, and has no native XML version. It has four record types, identified by their first character: 1 header (ヘッダーレコード), 2 data (データレコード), 8 trailer (トレーラーレコード), and 9 end of file (エンドレコード). Reconciliation data travels separately. ZEDI (全銀EDIシステム), live since December 2018, attaches an XML payload to the transfer that carries data such as the invoice number and the purchase order reference.

Structure of a Zengin data record (schematic)
HEADER record (120 bytes)
  1        record code                    "1"
  21       transaction type code          e.g. bulk transfer (総合振込)
  0        media code                     0 = online transmission
  ......   originator code                number assigned by the bank
  ......   originator name                HALF-WIDTH KATAKANA (半角カナ), 40 chars
  MMDD     requested execution date
  ....     bank code (4) + branch code (3) of the account to debit
  .        account type                   1 = ordinary (普通), 2 = checking (当座)
  .......  account number                 7 digits, right-aligned, zero-padded on the left

DATA record (120 bytes), one per payee
  2        record code                    "2"
  ....     payee bank code                4 digits
  ......   bank name in katakana          15 half-width chars
  ...      payee branch code              3 digits
  ......   branch name in katakana        15 half-width chars
  .        account type                   1 = 普通, 2 = 当座
  .......  payee account number           7 digits
  ......   PAYEE NAME                     30 chars, HALF-WIDTH KATAKANA ONLY
  ......   amount                         10 digits, WHOLE YEN, no decimals
  ......   customer code / free-form reference

TRAILER record "8": total record count + total amount
END record     "9": end of file
⚠️
Four pitfalls that break a Japanese integration
1. The payee name is written in half-width katakana (半角カナ), never in kanji or Latin letters. A company's legal name must therefore be transcribed, and the transcription must match the one on file at the bank. 2. The yen has no minor unit, so every amount is expressed in whole yen. A payment engine that applies a two-decimal exponent produces amounts 100 times too small. 3. Bank codes (4 digits) and branch codes (3 digits) are assigned and cannot be derived from any rule. They change with every bank merger. 4. Files have traditionally been encoded in Shift-JIS, not UTF-8. A single badly converted character shifts the entire record, because the length is fixed in bytes.

Two mechanisms complete the picture, and neither has a direct equivalent elsewhere. The first is payee name verification before a transfer, provided since 2005 by NTT Data's 統合ATMスイッチングサービス (integrated ATM switching service) and extended in 2014 to batch processing for payroll files. The check compares the name entered by the payer with the name the payee's bank holds for that account, and Japan has run it for 20 years. The second is 口座振替 (bank account debit), the rail for recurring bills such as rent, utilities, subscriptions, and credit card bills. It relies on a mandate signed with the debtor's bank, whereas a European direct debit relies on a mandate held by the creditor.

ℹ️
Japanese credit card bills are paid by monthly direct debit
Most Japanese credit cards run on 一回払い (single payment): the cardholder pays “in one go.” All of the month's purchases are debited from the cardholder's bank account by 口座振替 on a fixed date. The mechanism is a monthly deferred debit rather than revolving credit, since no balance carries over from one month to the next. Two consequences follow. Credit-averse consumers use the card without hesitation, and the issuer's risk comes down to whether the cardholder can pay on the debit date.

Cards in Japan: JCB, two switches, and surprisingly high interchange

JCB (Japan Credit Bureau), founded in 1961, is the only international card scheme born in East Asia other than UnionPay. JCB Co., Ltd. reports more than 175 million cardholders and about 71 million merchants in 195 countries and territories (JCB, 2025 communications). Its acceptance outside Asia relies largely on its reciprocal acceptance alliance with Discover Global Network, which turned 20 in 2025. In practice, a JCB card used in the US is accepted over the Discover network, and a Discover card used in Japan is accepted over the JCB network. JCB also runs QUICPay, one of Japan's two proprietary contactless rails.

The brands a Japanese merchant displays at the registerJCJCBVisaMastercardQUQUICPayIDiD

The Japanese market has one distinctive structural feature: card switching has never been in the hands of the banks. CAFIS (Credit And Finance Information System), run by NTT Data since 1984, is the long-standing, dominant authorization network. Every card integration in Japan touches it, because authorization requests pass through it between the merchant and the issuer. Its competitor, CARDNET (日本カードネットワーク), was incorporated on March 16, 1995, not in the 1980s as many sources claim. As of June 30, 2025, this industry joint venture listed JCB, NTT Data, Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, TIS, and Sumitomo Mitsui Card among its shareholders. They are joined by AEON Financial Service, Orient Corporation, Credit Saison, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Club, Jaccs, UCS, Life Card, and two merchant federations. It has ¥480 million in capital and 380 employees as of March 31, 2025. NTT Data, which runs CAFIS, is therefore a shareholder in its own competitor.

CategoryPublished rateTakeaway
General / Other2.28% to 2.88%Default category, by product (Classic, Gold, Platinum/Commercial/Rewards, Infinite)
Non-qualified2.68% to 3.28%Applies when a transaction fails the qualification criteria, which directly penalizes a poorly configured integration
Airlines1.10% to 1.70%Negotiated industry category
Utility0.60% to 0.90%Utility bills
B2B Platform Program0,50 %Program for B2B platforms, all products
Japanese domestic credit card interchange published by Visa (Visa, “インターチェンジフィー” page, visa.co.jp, accessed in 2026)
🔑
Japan's high acceptance costs come from interchange, not billing errors
Japan places no regulatory cap on domestic interchange. The general category runs from 2.28% to 2.88%, and the non-qualified category rises to 3.28%. Two consequences follow. Whether a transaction qualifies depends on the data sent, the entry mode, and the MCC, and it decides between two rate tables at least 40 basis points apart. The cost gap between cards and domestic QR codes is also much wider than in markets with capped interchange, which partly explains how fast merchants adopted barcode payments.

Two sets of rules govern card acceptance in Japan. The 割賦販売法 (Installment Sales Act), amended in 2018, requires member merchants to protect card data, either by not storing it or by complying with PCI DSS, and to take measures against fraudulent use. That law drove the rollout of chip terminals. The クレジットカード・セキュリティガイドライン (credit card security guidelines) issued by the 日本クレジット協会 (Japan Consumer Credit Association) set the industry's operating framework, and they required online merchants to deploy EMV 3-D Secure by the end of March 2025. Since then, 3-D Secure has been a condition of card acceptance in Japanese e-commerce: a merchant that has not deployed it cannot take card payments online.

With J-Debit (日本デビットカードシステム), launched in 1999 by the Japan Electronic Payment Promotion Organization (日本電子決済推進機構, JEPPO), cardholders pay in store directly with their bank ATM card. The system is still technically live. Internationally branded debit cards and QR codes have replaced it. Its volumes are now marginal, yet it is still running after 25 years and still appears in the acceptance matrices of integration documentation.

FeliCa, Suica, and the prepaid empire

Contactless payments in Japan run on FeliCa, a technology developed by Sony, standardized as JIS X 6319-4, and known in the NFC world as NFC-F, or Type F. Type F is distinct from Types A and B, which EMV contactless cards use. FeliCa transmits at 212 or 424 kbit/s, while Types A and B top out much lower. That speed lets it meet the transaction times required at Tokyo's subway fare gates, the constraint the whole ecosystem was built around. A typical Japanese terminal must therefore support three radio families, A, B, and F, plus QR codes.

2001
Suica and Rakuten Edy launch FeliCa prepaid
East Japan Railway Company (JR East) launches Suica for transit. The same year, bitWallet launches Edy (now Rakuten Edy, acquired by Rakuten in 2009–2010), the first FeliCa e-money designed for retail.
2005
Osaifu-keitai (“wallet phones”): NFC in the handset, 10 years before Apple Pay
NTT Docomo launches iD and JCB launches QUICPay, two post-paid contactless schemes linked to a credit card. By 2005, Japan is paying with its phones.
2007
Retailers issue their own money
nanaco (Seven Card Service, part of the Seven & i group) and WAON (AEON Financial Service) launch retailer-issued prepaid cards, accepted far beyond their own stores. The same year, PASMO (a consortium of Tokyo's private rail and bus operators) joins Suica.
2013
The 10 transit cards become interoperable nationwide
An agreement among JR East, JR West, JR Central, JR Kyushu, JR Hokkaido, and private operators covers Suica, PASMO, ICOCA, TOICA, SUGOCA, Kitaca, manaca, PiTaPa, nimoca, and はやかけん. A card bought in Fukuoka works in Sapporo. The system is entirely FeliCa-based, with no QR codes involved. PiTaPa (Kansai) is the exception: it is the only post-paid card in the group.
March 2025
JR East opens Suica to visitors and announces an overhaul
JR East launches Welcome Suica Mobile for iPhone, aimed at visitors (valid for 180 days; Shinkansen e-tickets available since fall 2025). At the same time, JR East announces that it will turn Suica into a broader payment service.
112M
Suica cards issued, including 33M Mobile Suica accounts
JR East, 2025
~43M
PASMO cards issued (2025 industry figure, not verified with PASMO Co., Ltd.)
Industry sources, 2025
~2.05M
QUICPay acceptance points in Japan (industry source, year not specified, not verified)
Industry sources
¥6T
e-money volume in Japan in 2025, or 3.7% of cashless payments, losing ground to barcode payments
METI, March 31, 2026
ℹ️
Japanese prepaid is shrinking, but it will not disappear
E-money is the only Japanese payment instrument whose volume fell in METI's 2025 statistics, and its share is shrinking in favor of credit cards and QR codes. Two uses keep it alive, and no other instrument covers them. It is still the only method accepted at transit fare gates, where transaction time is a physical constraint. It also serves the age groups and the micro-payments that credit cards don't reach. A neighborhood store that stops accepting Suica loses the customers who pay with their transit card on the way to and from work.
⚠️
FeliCa and hardware: the question to ask before ordering a POS terminal
Reading FeliCa depends on the hardware, on both the cardholder and the merchant side. Apple built FeliCa into iPhones sold in Japan starting with the iPhone 7 (2016), then into every model worldwide with the iPhone 8 and iPhone X. On the acceptance side, a standard EMV contactless terminal imported from Europe or the US cannot read Suica, iD, or QUICPay, because it has no Type F radio. Accepting these instruments therefore requires a FeliCa-certified reader, the first hardware cost item in a Japanese launch. The terminal decision comes before the commercial rollout, because an installed base from Europe or the US cannot simply be reused in Japan.

PayPay, JPQR, konbini, and deferred payment

Japan's code payment wallets fought it out between 2018 and 2025, and this Japanese barcode war ended with one player on top. PayPay was launched in late 2018 by PayPay Corporation (part of the SoftBank / LY Corporation group) with a cashback campaign more aggressive than anything seen before. It reports 70 million registered users as of July 15, 2025, close to 55% of Japan's population, and 2025 industry analyses credit it with about two-thirds of the code payment market. Consolidation happened within the group. LINE Pay Japan shut down on April 30, 2025. Its balances were transferred to PayPay between January 27 and April 23, 2025, with limits of ¥20,000 a day and ¥100,000 in total. The remainder was refunded under the 資金決済法 (Payment Services Act).

¥16.6T
code payment volume in Japan in 2025, up from ¥200 billion in 2018
METI, March 31, 2026
70M
registered PayPay users as of July 15, 2025
PayPay Corporation, press release, July 15, 2025
~¥2T
cumulative value sent through Cotra (ことら送金) as of October 2025, up from ¥1.5 trillion in June 2025
Cotra Inc., 2025
10,2 %
share of the population using Cotra, against 28.7% awareness
MMD Research, October 2025
WalletOperatorSinceWhat drives itLicense type
PayPayPayPay Corporation (SoftBank / LY Corporation)2018Massive cashback, then network effects; absorbed LINE Pay JapanLive, a must-have
Rakuten PayRakuten Payment, Inc.2016Rakuten ecosystem and Rakuten Points, a quasi-currency in JapanLive
d払いNTT Docomo2018d POINT and carrier billingLive
au PAYKDDI2019au PAY Card and the digital bank au Jibun BankLive
MerpayMerpay, Inc. (Mercari group)2019Seller balances from the Mercari C2C marketplace; deferred payment via メルペイスマート払いLive
Bank PayJEPPO2020Direct debit from the bank account, built on J-DebitLive, low adoption
ゆうちょPay株式会社ゆうちょ銀行 (Japan Post Bank)–Japan Post Bank accountShutdown announced for December 2026; remove from acceptance matrices
LINE Pay (Japan)LY Corporation2014–Discontinued April 30, 2025; LINE Pay is still active in Taiwan as a separate entity
Origami PayOrigami Inc. (acquired by Mercari)2016–Discontinued in 2020, a pioneer knocked out by the cashback war
7paySeven Pay Co. (Seven & i)2019–Launched July 1, 2019, shut down September 30, 2019, after a mass account takeover
The Japanese wallets a merchant has to choose among

JPQR is Japan's unified payment code standard, defined in 2019 by the Payments Japan Association (キャッシュレス推進協議会) at METI's urging. A single code replaces the 10 codes a merchant would otherwise display, one per accepted provider. Its international extension, JPQR Global, launched on July 5, 2025, at the Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai site. It links JPQR with foreign QR standards, starting with KHQR (Cambodia), then QRIS (Indonesia) from August 17, 2025. Tourists from Southeast Asia have since been able to pay in Japan with their home-country wallets without going through a private gateway, something no arrangement allowed before JPQR Global.

🔑
The konbini, a payment infrastructure nobody counts as one
Japan's convenience stores (コンビニ, konbini) are full-fledged cash collection points. コンビニ収納代行 (convenience store bill payment) means paying, at a store, an invoice that carries a barcode or a payment number. The buyer orders online, then pays cash at the register of a 7-Eleven, FamilyMart, or Lawson. This mechanism underpins Japanese deferred payment. NP後払い (Net Protections, 2002), three years ahead of Klarna (2005) in this business, and Paidy (2014, owned by PayPal since 2021 after a $2.7 billion deal) deliver first and bill later, and customers often settle in cash at a konbini. An online checkout that does not offer konbini payment therefore shuts out an entire segment: buyers who order online and pay at a convenience store counter.

Two more mechanisms complete the picture. Carrier billing (キャリア決済) is still a payment method in its own right for digital content, games, and subscriptions, even though it has nearly disappeared in Europe. It takes the form of d払い/ドコモ払い at NTT Docomo, auかんたん決済 at KDDI, and まとめて支払い at SoftBank. The 資金決済法 (Payment Services Act) then sorts providers into several license types. Prepaid issuers fall under 前払式支払手段 (prepaid payment instruments), and money transfer providers under 資金移動業 (funds transfer business), which has been split into three categories since 2021. The second and most common is capped at ¥1 million per transaction. A Japanese wallet is therefore not a payment account, and the cap tied to its license determines which use cases it can cover.

Korea's interbank rails: KFTC, BOK-Wire+, and open banking

Korea's payment infrastructure rests on two pillars. The first is a central bank RTGS, BOK-Wire+ (한은금융망), run by the Bank of Korea since 1994 on a hybrid model: gross settlement, plus netting mechanisms that save liquidity. The second is a single shared operator for everything else: the Korea Financial Telecommunications & Clearings Institute (금융결제원, KFTC), a nonprofit owned by its member banks. The KFTC runs interbank transfers, the shared ATM network, giro, bulk direct debits, and open banking. This concentration sets Korea apart from markets where several clearing houses and competing switches coexist.

SystemOfficial nameSinceRole
BOK-Wire+한은금융망1994Hybrid RTGS and the final settlement asset for all KFTC systems, run by the Bank of Korea
Interbank transfers타행환 / 전자금융공동망1989Near-instant transfer rail: the payee is credited immediately, and interbank positions are netted multilaterally, then settled the next day on BOK-Wire+
Shared ATM networkCD공동망 (Interbank Shared Network)1988Cardholders can use any ATM in the country
Giro지로시스템1977Bill payments and bulk direct debits (utilities, taxes, insurance premiums)
CMS자금관리서비스망1996Cash Management Service: corporate bulk direct debits and transfers, with electronic mandates; the rail for subscriptions and recurring dues
Bill and check clearing어음교환시스템1910Checks and bills, largely digitized through image truncation; still used for paper B2B bills
Open Banking오픈뱅킹2019Single API gateway: balance inquiries and transfer initiation on accounts at every bank, open to fintechs from day one
Networks run by the KFTC, and the Bank of Korea's RTGS
🔑
How Korea made open banking work where PSD2 fell short
Korea's 오픈뱅킹 (open banking) launched in 2019 at the urging of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and is run by the KFTC. It works as a single technical gateway, with one API for every bank, rather than a theoretical access right that each fintech must enforce bank by bank. It charges very low, regulated access fees. Toss, Kakao Pay, and Naver Pay therefore got working interfaces through a single connection, without negotiating with each bank. Payment initiation was in scope from launch, not added later. The single gateway, the regulated pricing, and early payment initiation together explain how Korean wallets gained ground against the banks.

The Bank of Korea sets out its 2026–2027 agenda in its annual payment systems report (지급결제보고서) for 2025, which lists four projects. BOK-Wire+ operating hours were extended on March 30, 2026. Next comes raising the collateral ratio for net settlement from 90% to 100%. ISO 20022 adoption is scheduled for the second quarter of 2026. An offshore won settlement system (역외 원화결제시스템) is being built for launch in 2027. That last project matters most for a foreign company. The won is not freely tradable outside Korea, and the planned system targets exactly that constraint.

On digital currency, the Bank of Korea ran the first live-transaction pilot of 프로젝트 한강 (Project Hangang) in June 2025. It used deposit tokens issued by commercial banks, not a retail central bank digital currency in the strict sense (Bank of Korea, 지급결제보고서 2025). Japan is moving on a deliberately slower timeline. Since April 2023, the Bank of Japan has run a Pilot Program for a digital yen (デジタル円) that brings in the private sector through a CBDC Forum, following two proof-of-concept phases from 2021 to 2023. It explicitly makes any issuance conditional on legislation and public debate. Neither country has decided to issue.

ℹ️
Korea's commercial bills also exist in electronic form, alongside the paper system
The 전자어음 is Korea's electronic bill. It is issued, endorsed, and presented for payment in digital form. It is administered by the 한국예탁결제원 (Korea Securities Depository), the designated operator of the system, and it is the Korean counterpart of Japan's Densai Net. It coexists with the KFTC's 어음교환시스템, which clears checks and bills through image truncation and survives only for B2B bills still on paper. An inventory of Korean systems that stops at the latter wrongly suggests that Korea is still stuck with paper bills.

Credit cards rule: VANs, PGs, and regulated fees

Korea is the world's most card-intensive market, and that intensity is the product of public policy. After the Asian financial crisis, the government promoted card payments to broaden the tax base, through two measures that are still in force. The first is an income tax deduction for card spending, with debit cards and the 현금영수증 (cash receipt) getting more favorable treatment than credit cards. The second is the obligation, under the 여신전문금융업법 (Specialized Credit Finance Business Act), for member merchants not to refuse card payments. Merchants are also barred from setting a minimum amount and from passing the fee on to the cardholder.

₩2.9T/day
average daily credit card spending in Korea in 2025 (+4.6%), or 79.5% of payment card spending
Bank of Korea, March 30, 2026
1,800 vs. 1,300
₩ billion a day, in person (+1.8%) vs. remote (+6.4%), in 2025: remote spending is growing three times as fast
Bank of Korea, March 30, 2026
51,9 %
share of simplified payments (간편지급) in card-not-present payments in 2025
Bank of Korea, March 30, 2026
~130M
credit cards issued in Korea (2023), for a population of about 51 million
Statista, 2023 (industry data not verified against an FSS report)

Issuing is concentrated among nine licensed card companies (여신전문금융회사): Shinhan, Samsung, KB Kookmin, Hyundai, Lotte, Hana, Woori, NH Nonghyup, and BC. BC Card (비씨카드, 1982, KT group) holds a unique position as the only domestic card scheme and processor. It issues and processes cards for about 10 banks that have no card subsidiary of their own. It is also the country's largest acquirer, with an estimated 42.6% acquiring market share in 2023 (industry sources, not verified against an FSS report). By purchase volume, Shinhan Card is put at 24.8% and Lotte Card at 14.3%, with 18.7 million cards in 2023 (same source caveats).

⚠️
In Korea, a Visa- or Mastercard-branded card doesn't run through Visa or Mastercard
Korean domestic transactions do not run over the international networks' rails, even when the card carries their brand. The issuing card company authorizes and clears them through the VAN layer and BC Card. The international logo only matters for use outside Korea. A Visa or Mastercard acquiring contract signed abroad therefore gives no access to Korean domestic transactions, which can only be processed under a contract with a local provider.
Korea's acceptance chain: two mandatory intermediary layers
Cardholder
Presents a card in store, or pays online
In person: EMV contactless or chip insert. Online: simplified payment (간편지급) from a card stored in a wallet, or manual card entry with authentication
Member merchant (가맹점)
Cannot refuse the card
A legal obligation under the 여신전문금융업법: no refusal, no minimum amount, and no surcharge passed on to the cardholder
VAN (in person): Nice Information & Telecom, KIS Information, KICC, Smartro
Carries authorizations and batches from the terminal
An intermediary layer unique to Korea, in place since 1990: the terminal never talks directly to the issuer
PG (online): KG Inicis, NHN KCP, Toss Payments, Danal
Holds the e-commerce merchant contract
The PG, not the VAN, signs the contract with the online merchant. An inventory that covers only the VAN layer misses half the market
Card company (여신전문금융회사)
Authorizes, clears, and pays the merchant
Nine issuers, including BC Card, which processes for other banks. Merchant fees are capped by regulation
BOK-Wire+
Settles net positions
Final settlement across accounts held at the Bank of Korea; collateral for net settlement raised to 100%
🔑
In Korea, acceptance pricing is set, not negotiated
Korean merchant fees are capped by regulation, with preferential rates for small and midsize merchants. The FSC reviews them periodically against a recalculated benchmark cost (적격비용, “eligible costs”). Two consequences follow. For a merchant, the price of acceptance is essentially non-negotiable, so providers compete on services rather than on rates. For an issuer or acquirer building a Korean business model, the acceptance margin is an exogenous parameter set by the regulator. It goes into a revenue forecast as a periodically revised input, not as a variable the company controls.

Kakao Pay, Naver Pay, Toss, and what it takes to accept payments

Korean simplified payment (간편지급) means paying with a payment method already stored in an app, without re-entering card details. It has gone from a convenience to the main rail of online commerce. In 2025, it averaged ₩1,105.3 billion a day, up 14.6% year over year. It also accounted for 51.9% of all card-not-present card payments (Bank of Korea, March 20 and 30, 2026). The split by type of provider shows how the market is balanced. The 전자금융업자, meaning fintechs, hold 54.9% of the value, up 4.4 percentage points, against 23.7% for financial institutions and 21.5% for phone makers. Within simplified card payments, the Bank of Korea measures 72.5% for fintechs vs. 27.5% for card companies. Nonbanks therefore own most of the cardholder relationship.

💬
Kakao Pay (카카오페이)
Kakao Pay Corp., 2014, listed since November 2021. Built on KakaoTalk, the messaging app nearly every Korean uses, it covers online payments, in-store QR, transfers, insurance, and investing. Regulatory red flag. The company was fined ₩15 billion by the Financial Supervisory Service in April 2025 for transferring the data of 40 million users to Alipay Singapore Holdings without consent.
🟢
Naver Pay (네이버페이)
Naver Financial Corp., 2015. The wallet of Korea's leading portal and leading marketplace (Smart Store). Its strength is e-commerce checkout and its points program, more than in-store payments. A merchant selling online in Korea looks at Naver Pay first.
🔵
Toss (토스)
Viva Republica Inc., 2015. It started with free P2P transfers and grew into a financial super app with Toss Bank, Toss Payments (a PG built on the acquisition of LG U+'s PG business), and Toss Securities. It claimed more than 20 million users in 2021. Its valuation reached $7.4 billion in its June 2021 funding round. It is the world's best example of a fintech built on low-cost open banking access.
📱
Samsung Pay
Samsung Electronics, 2015. The only wallet to bring MST (Magnetic Secure Transmission) to the mass market. MST emulated the magnetic stripe, so it worked on terminals without NFC. That was a decisive advantage in Korea, where most terminals still read only the stripe. MST has since been dropped from new models, which pushed the country to NFC/EMV.
🎫
T-money and Cashbee
T-money (Korea Smart Card Co., Ltd., 2004, jointly owned by the Seoul city government and LG CNS) and Cashbee (run by 이동의즐거움 under the shared 이즐 brand) are prepaid e-money products that started in transit and are now accepted at neighborhood stores and in taxis. Any documentation naming Lotte Data Communication as Cashbee's operator is out of date.
📞
Carrier billing (휴대폰 소액결제)
Danal, KG Mobilians, and Galaxia Money Tree, on behalf of SKT, KT, and LG U+, since 2000. Carrier billing subject to a regulatory monthly cap. Still a common payment method for digital content and small e-commerce sites.
ServiceAverage daily valueYear-over-year changeTransactions per day
Simple payment (간편지급)KRW 1,105.3B+14,6 %–
Payment gateway (PG)KRW 1,554.2B+9,2 %33.64M (−11.8%)
Electronic prepaid (선불전자지급수단)KRW 1,305.1B+11,0 %36.54M (+8.0%)
Simple transfer (간편송금)KRW 978.5B+7,3 %7.42M (+2.9%)
Korean electronic payment services in 2025 (Bank of Korea, “2025년중 전자지급서비스 이용현황,” March 20, 2026)
⚠️
What breaks when you enter these two markets
Japan. A standard EMV contactless terminal cannot read Suica, iD, or QUICPay; accepting them requires FeliCa-certified hardware. A Zengin file encoded in UTF-8, written in kanji, or containing two-decimal amounts gets rejected. Since the end-of-March 2025 deadline, accepting cards online requires EMV 3-D Secure. Non-qualified interchange runs as high as 3.28%, so transaction qualification directly drives acceptance costs and needs daily monitoring. Korea. Domestic acceptance requires a local contract with a PG online or a VAN in person, because an international acquiring contract only covers foreign cards. Checkout flows often require local identity verification tied to a Korean phone number, which nonresident buyers cannot use. Merchant fees are regulated, and their level is not open to commercial negotiation.
✅
Key takeaways for operating in the region
Entering these two markets means working through local players. In Japan, cards account for 82.7% of cashless payments, and a merchant's coverage depends on the full set it accepts: PayPay, credit cards with 3-D Secure, FeliCa, and konbini payment. In Korea, where merchant fees are regulated, the challenge is local contracting. That means a PG for online sales, a VAN for in-person payments, and the three wallets, Kakao Pay, Naver Pay, and Toss, which handle more than half of card-not-present card payments. The counterparts that make or break a project are Zengin-Net, NTT Data, or the Payments Japan Association in Japan, and the KFTC, the FSC, and a local PG in Korea, never an international network.