Reference🌏 Payments in Asia-PacificIntermediate⏱ 28 min read

🇯🇵 Payments in Japan

Zengin and its 120-byte fixed-position format, CAFIS and CARDNET in authorization, JCB and the cost of acceptance, FeliCa and Suica, PayPay and barcode payments, konbini and deferred payment, and how the FSA and METI split licensing

What the official figures actually measure

The cashless payment ratio is the share of transactions, by value, paid with anything other than cash. METI calculates and publishes it for Japan every year. It put the ratio at 58.0% for 2025, on ¥162.7 trillion of transactions. Credit cards alone accounted for 82.7% of that. Barcode payments came next at 10.2%, prepaid e-money at 3.7%, and debit cards at 3.4%. For several years now, these figures have contradicted Japan’s reputation as a country that clings to cash. Three features define the Japanese payments market, and the sections below take them one at a time. Credit cards dominate. Prepaid contactless runs on a technology that imported terminals cannot read. And no bank controls the switching layer.

58,0 %
cashless payment ratio in 2025, on ¥162.7 trillion, new domestic indicator
METI, “2025年のキャッシュレス決済比率を算出しました,” March 31, 2026
¥134.6T
credit card volume in 2025, or 82.7% of cashless payments
METI, March 31, 2026
320.57M
credit cards in circulation as of March 31, 2025, including 12.14M corporate cards
Japan Consumer Credit Association (日本クレジット協会), survey published November 14, 2025 (243 responding companies)
8.43M/day
transactions processed by the Zengin System, worth about ¥17.5 trillion per business day
Japanese Bankers Association, December 2025 data
⚠️
Two cashless indicators, and only one compares internationally
METI now publishes two separate series. The domestic indicator, which has a broad scope, gives 58.0% for 2025. The international comparison indicator, the one foreign studies cite, gives 46.3% for the same year. Both figures are correct, but they cover different scopes. The government’s target of 65% by 2030, and its longer-term goal of 80%, are set on the new indicator. The 12-point gap between the two series for 2025 is enough to skew any comparison with Europe that does not check which of the two is being quoted.
AreaLegal basisAuthorityWhat it means for a new entrant
Banking, deposit accounts, data aggregation銀行法 (Banking Act)FSA (金融庁)Banking license; registration as a 電子決済等代行業者 (electronic payment agent) for account access
Prepaid, funds transfer, stablecoins資金決済法 (Payment Services Act)FSA, through its local finance bureausPrepaid notification, three classes of 資金移動業 (funds transfer), 電子決済手段 (electronic payment instruments) since 2023
Credit cards, deferred payment, merchant agreements割賦販売法 (Installment Sales Act)METI (経済産業省)Registration of acquirers and PSPs, duty to vet affiliated merchants
Interbank settlement, oversight of payment systems日本銀行法Bank of JapanBOJ-NET as the final settlement asset; oversight of Zengin-Net
Anti-money laundering, customer identification犯罪収益移転防止法FSA and National Police AgencyIdentity verification required of 特定事業者 (specified business operators), wallets included
Who regulates what in Japan: a split that is not intuitive

This split has a direct effect on licensing. A prepaid wallet issuer answers to the FSA, while a card acquirer answers to METI, so the applications go to different places on different timetables. A company that wants to accept cards and also hold customer balances therefore runs two parallel processes, with two agencies that do not coordinate their deadlines. Neither review waits for the other. The launch date depends on the slower of the two, and the gap runs to months.

Zengin: retail credit transfers since 1973

The Zengin System (全銀システム) exchanges and clears retail interbank credit transfers in Japan in near real time. It is run by Zengin-Net (全国銀行資金決済ネットワーク), licensed under the 資金決済法 (Payment Services Act) since September 2010, and nearly every deposit-taking institution in the country takes part. It went live in April 1973, 45 years before it moved to round-the-clock operation and decades before instant payments spread worldwide. In December 2025, it processed about 8.43 million transactions and ¥17.5 trillion per business day, or nearly 2.04 billion transactions over the year. It has run 24/7 since October 2018, through the Zengin More Time System.

SystemOfficial nameOperatorSinceFunction
Zengin System全銀システムZengin-Net (全国銀行資金決済ネットワーク)1973Near-real-time retail transfers, 24/7 since October 2018
BOJ-NET日銀ネットBank of Japan1988Yen RTGS, the final settlement asset; “Next-Generation RTGS” overhaul, 2008–2011
FXYCS外国為替円決済制度Tokyo Bankers Association, on BOJ-NET1980Yen leg of FX and cross-border payments
Cotraことら送金Cotra Inc. (株式会社ことら)2022Interbank P2P up to ¥100,000, free, addressed by phone number or email
Densai NetでんさいネットZengin Electronic Monetary Claims Network Co., Ltd.2013電子記録債権 electronic receivables, replacing paper bills
電子交換所Electronic Clearing HouseJapanese Bankers Association2022Image-based clearing of bills and checks; shuts down March 31, 2027
統合ATMスイッチングIntegrated ATM Switching ServiceNTT Data2004Links the ATM networks; payee verification since 2005
Japan’s interbank infrastructure and who runs it
🔑
The ¥100 million threshold
A transfer under ¥100 million is cleared, then settled at the end of the day on net balances. A transfer at or above that threshold is processed individually, with gross settlement on accounts at the Bank of Japan. Crossing the threshold changes the settlement timetable, the operating window, and the cost of the transaction. A ¥120 million supplier payment therefore does not travel the same route as a ¥90 million one. A treasury or B2B cash-flow model that ignores the threshold will put the first on the second’s timetable.

Interbank pricing for transfers changed fundamentally in 2021. Until then, the sending bank paid the receiving bank ¥117 for transfers under ¥30,000 and ¥162 above that, a schedule that had not changed in more than 40 years. Zengin-Net abolished it in an announcement on March 18, 2021. Since October 1, 2021, a flat 内国為替制度運営費 (domestic transfer system fee) of ¥62 before tax has applied regardless of amount. It breaks down into ¥50 for processing on the receiving side and ¥12 as a continuity margin. It is up for review every five years. The sending bank pays the ¥62 on every transfer, so any lower customer price is charged at a loss. That fee sets the economic floor for any transfer fee a Japanese customer pays.

Two openings followed the pricing reform. Since 2022, the Zengin System has admitted non-bank funds transfer providers (資金移動業者), under an industry decision taken in September 2022. An API gateway went live on November 25, 2025. For peer-to-peer payments, the major banks set up Cotra (ことら送金) in 2022 in response to the wallets. The service caps each transfer at ¥100,000, is free, and identifies the payee by phone number or email. Cotra reported about ¥2 trillion in cumulative volume in October 2025 and 418 participating institutions in February 2026. Awareness remains low, however, at 28.7%, with a usage rate of 10.2% (MMD Research, October 2025).

⚠️
A national rail can go down, and this one did
From October 10 to 12, 2023, a failure in the Zengin System’s relay equipment halted transfers at several member banks. Zengin-Net issued a series of statements, then an industry agreement on compensating customers on October 18, 2023. The FSA ordered it to file reports on October 13 and December 18, 2023. The incident reset its technical strategy. On March 19, 2026, Zengin-Net published the findings of a study group on the system’s future. Stacking more functions on the current architecture is reaching its limits, and the group judged a new system better on both cost and flexibility. The trade press puts the target go-live around 2030. The outage lasted three days and hit the transfers themselves, not a peripheral service. A business continuity plan in Japan therefore cannot rely on Zengin transfers alone.

The Zengin format: 120 bytes, fixed positions, half-width katakana

The 全銀協規定フォーマット (Zengin standard format) is the file format that carries every bulk transfer, payroll run, bonus payment, and direct debit between a Japanese company and its bank. It uses fixed-length 120-byte records, a legacy of magnetic tape, transmitted over the 全銀協標準通信プロトコル protocol. Each file stacks four record types, identified by their first character: 1 header, 2 data, 8 trailer totals, 9 end. Banks publish their own specifications. Those of Mitsubishi UFJ Trust, Chiba Bank, and Oita Bank match field for field, because the format belongs to the bankers association.

総合振込 bulk transfer: exact layout of the four records (120 bytes each)
HEADER  (データ区分 = 1)
 pos  type  len  field
   1   N     1   データ区分            "1"
   2   N     2   種別コード            21=総合振込 / 11 or 71=給与 / 12 or 72=賞与 / 91=口座振替
   4   N     1   コード区分            0=JIS, 1=EBCDIC
   5   N    10   委託者コード          assigned by the bank, per contract
  15   C    40   委託者名              HALF-WIDTH KATAKANA
  55   N     4   振込指定日            MMDD (no year)
  59   N     4   仕向金融機関コード     4 digits
  63   C    15   仕向金融機関名         half-width katakana
  78   N     3   仕向支店番号          3 digits
  81   C    15   仕向支店名            half-width katakana
  96   N     1   預金種目(依頼人)      1=普通, 2=当座
  97   N     7   口座番号(依頼人)      right-aligned, zero-padded
 104   C    17   ダミー                spaces

DATA  (one record per payee, データ区分 = 2)
   1   N     1   データ区分            "2"
   2   N     4   被仕向金融機関番号
   6   C    15   被仕向金融機関名       left-aligned, space-padded
  21   N     3   被仕向支店番号
  24   C    15   被仕向支店名
  39   N     4   手形交換所番号        optional (spaces)
  43   N     1   預金種目              1=普通, 2=当座, 4=貯蓄
  44   N     7   口座番号
  51   C    30   受取人名              NAME EXACTLY AS REGISTERED AT THE BANK
  81   N    10   振込金額              WHOLE YEN, right-aligned, zero-padded
  91   N     1   新規コード            optional
  92   N    10   顧客コード1           free-form originator reference
 102   N    10   顧客コード2           free-form originator reference
 112   C     9   ダミー                spaces

TRAILER (データ区分 = 8)  : 合計件数 N(6) + 合計金額 N(12) + ダミー C(101)
END     (データ区分 = 9)  : ダミー C(119)

N = unsigned zoned decimal  ·  C = half-width character
    katakana, Latin capitals and digits only
⚠️
Five pitfalls that sink a Japan integration
1. The payee name fits in 30 half-width katakana characters (半角カナ): no kanji, no hiragana, no lowercase Latin letters. The transliteration must exactly match the one the account holder registered with their bank. 2. An N field holds an unsigned zoned decimal, not a binary integer. Each digit takes one byte, and the field is right-aligned and zero-padded. 3. The yen has no minor unit, so an engine that assumes two implied decimal places divides every amount by 100. 4. Files are encoded in JIS or EBCDIC, never UTF-8. Length is fixed in bytes, so a single badly converted character shifts the entire record and everything after it. 5. Because the 振込指定日 field holds MMDD with no year, a file submitted in late December for execution in January is misread if the processing assumes the current year.

Japan’s direct debit, 口座振替, uses the same format with type code 91. It differs from European direct debit in where the mandate sits. The mandate is agreed between the debtor and the debtor’s own bank, on a 預金口座振替依頼書 (direct debit authorization form), rather than held by the creditor. This rail carries rent, utilities, subscriptions, and monthly credit card bills. The data record has a 30-character 預金者名 field, a 20-digit 顧客番号 for the creditor’s reference, and a one-digit 振替結果コード that the bank fills in on the return file.

CodeMeaningDriverRecommended action
0振替済Debit collectedReconcile and close out the receivable
1資金不足Insufficient funds in the accountFollow up; re-present in the next cycle, never the same day
2取引なしAccount closed or does not existNever re-present; ask for new bank details
3預金者都合による振替停止The account holder stopped the debit at their bankTreat as a mandate revocation; contact the customer
4預金口座振替依頼書なしNo authorization form on file at the bankEnrollment failure: have the customer sign the mandate again
8委託者都合による振替停止The creditor itself requested the stopCheck internal controls on the collection file
9その他Other reasonEscalate to the bank: the code tells you nothing more
The 口座振替 return file (振替結果コード) and what to do with it
ℹ️
What Zengin can do that the format does not show
Two mechanisms complete the setup without showing up in the file format. The 統合ATMスイッチングサービス (Integrated ATM Switching Service), run by NTT Data since 2004, has provided payee name verification before a transfer since 2005, with a batch version added in 2014 for payroll files. Japan has therefore used payee verification for 20 years, without any regulation requiring it. ZEDI (全銀EDIシステム), live since December 2018, attaches an XML payload with invoice and order references to the transfer. The 120-byte format has not gone away, though. It remains the default channel for nearly every company.

CAFIS, CARDNET, and the authorization network

CAFIS (Credit And Finance Information System) is the network that switches card authorization requests between Japanese points of sale and issuers. Card switching has never been owned by the banks. NTT Data, an IT company with roots in telecoms, has run CAFIS since 1984. It is still the dominant authorization network, and every Japanese card integration goes through it, directly or through an intermediary. NTT Data has built it out into a family of platforms, including CAFIS Arch for newer traffic. The same company also runs the INFOX terminal network, whose FOMA and INS-P line connections shut down on March 31, 2026, a hardware deadline that not every older terminal fleet has met.

How a card-present authorization really flows in Japan
Cardholder
Inserts the card or taps the phone
EMV chip and PIN, or contactless (FeliCa for iD and QUICPay, EMV for Visa, Mastercard, and JCB)
Terminal
Builds the request
The terminal connects to a processing center, rarely straight to the acquirer
Authorization network
Switches to the issuer
CAFIS (NTT Data) or CARDNET (日本カードネットワーク), depending on which the processing center connects to
Issuer
Decides and responds
A credit company (信販) or a bank subsidiary: Sumitomo Mitsui Card, Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, JCB, Credit Saison, Orient Corporation, AEON Financial Service
Sales submission and settlement
Sales data sent, then the merchant is paid
The network also carries sales data and supports merchant settlement
Cardholder, one month later
Debit via 口座振替 (direct debit)
The month’s purchases are debited from the bank account in one go, on a fixed date

The second switch is CARDNET (日本カードネットワーク), a company incorporated on March 16, 1995, not in the 1980s as is often claimed. The industry owns it jointly. Its shareholder list as of June 30, 2025, includes JCB, NTT Data, Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, TIS, and Sumitomo Mitsui Card, along with AEON Financial Service, Orient Corporation, Credit Saison, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Club, Jaccs, UCS, Life Card, and two merchant federations. It has ¥480 million in capital and had 380 employees as of March 31, 2025. NTT Data, which runs CAFIS, is thus a shareholder in its own competitor. Each processing center connects to one network or the other. Japanese card routing is therefore split between two switches, and the operator of the first owns a stake in the second.

¥51.05B
card fraud losses recorded in 2025, down 8% year over year
Japan Consumer Credit Association, published March 6, 2026
¥47.54B
card-number misuse, or 93% of total fraud
Japan Consumer Credit Association, March 6, 2026
¥0.72B
counterfeit cards, a residual share since EMV became universal
Japan Consumer Credit Association, March 6, 2026
−42,1 %
year-over-year drop in fraud in Q4 2025, to ¥9.39 billion
Japan Consumer Credit Association, March 6, 2026
⚠️
EMV 3-D Secure has been mandatory since April 2025
The クレジットカード・セキュリティガイドライン (Credit Card Security Guidelines) set the security rules for card transactions in Japan. Revised to version 5.0 on March 15, 2024, then to version 6.0 in March 2025, they require every e-commerce merchant to deploy EMV 3-D Secure by the end of March 2025 at the latest. Since April 2025, card companies have been asking their merchants whether they comply, and they can enforce the answer under the merchant contract. Card-number misuse, which cardholder authentication targets directly, made up 93% of 2025 losses. Launching e-commerce in Japan therefore means deploying 3-D Secure from day one.

The rules come from the 割賦販売法 (Installment Sales Act), revised in 2018 and administered by METI. The act created a register of クレジットカード番号等取扱契約締結事業者 (card merchant contracting firms). It lists acquirers, and also the providers that sign up merchants on an issuer’s behalf, which means PSPs. Registration comes with oversight duties: the registered firm must vet its affiliated merchants, fix deficient practices, and, if needed, terminate the contract. The same act requires merchants either not to store card data or to comply with PCI DSS. The 2018 revision made chip terminals the norm nationwide.

JCB, the acquiring chain, and the cost of acceptance

JCB (Japan Credit Bureau) is a Japanese payment card scheme, founded in 1961, that went international in 1981. Apart from UnionPay, it is still the only international card scheme to come out of East Asia. Its 2025–2026 corporate profile claims more than 181 million cardholders and about 71 million merchants in more than 190 countries and territories. Issuing remains concentrated in Asia. Acceptance elsewhere relies largely on a reciprocity agreement with Discover Global Network, so a JCB card used in the US in practice runs over the Discover network. JCB also operates QUICPay, one of Japan’s two proprietary contactless rails.

The brands on display at a Japanese checkoutJCJCBVisaMastercardQUQUICPayIDiDPAPayPay

Japan’s acquiring chain splits card issuing and merchant acquiring between separate companies. Issuing is handled by credit companies backed by banks or retailers, including Sumitomo Mitsui Card, Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, JCB, Credit Saison, Orient Corporation, AEON Financial Service, Jaccs, and Rakuten Card. Merchants rarely contract with them directly. Instead they go through a PSP, which signs them up under a master agreement with several card companies. GMO Payment Gateway, SB Payment Service, Sony Payment Services, and DG Financial Technology play that role. As a firm registered under the 割賦販売法 (Installment Sales Act), the PSP carries the duty to vet its merchants. A foreign merchant therefore enters the market through a PSP, which in practice is the only counterparty it deals with.

CategoryPublished rateWhat it means in practice
General / Other2.28% to 2.88%Default category, by product: Classic, Gold, Platinum, Commercial, Infinite
Non-qualified2.68% to 3.28%Applies when a transaction fails the qualification criteria. This is where a misconfigured integration costs you
Airlines1.10% to 1.70%Negotiated industry category
Utility0.60% to 0.90%Utility bills
B2B Platform Program0,50 %Program for B2B platforms
Japanese domestic credit card interchange: standard rates published by Visa (visa.co.jp, categories checked in 2026)
🔑
Card acceptance costs in Japan come from interchange, not PSP fees
Japan does not cap interchange. Rates were not even public until November 30, 2022, when Visa, Mastercard, and UnionPay published them at the request of the Japan Fair Trade Commission and METI. The general category sits at around 2.3% to 2.9%, and the non-qualified category goes up to 3.28%, levels unheard of in markets with capped interchange. This has two consequences. First, whether a transaction qualifies depends on the data sent, the entry mode, and the merchant category code. The gap between the two categories is at least 40 basis points, which makes qualification a margin lever rather than a technical setting. Second, the cost gap between cards and domestic barcode payments is far wider than elsewhere, which explains why merchants have embraced QR codes.
ℹ️
A Japanese credit card is a monthly charge card, not credit
The vast majority of card payments are made as 一回払い, “single payment.” All of the month’s purchases are debited by 口座振替 (direct debit) from the cardholder’s bank account on a fixed date. There is no revolving balance, no interest, and no choice at checkout. This setup explains two behaviors. Consumers who are wary of credit make heavy use of an instrument called a “credit card.” And the issuer carries a month-to-month solvency risk rather than a balance risk, which explains why approval criteria are looser than one might expect for a credit product. One historical benchmark remains: the government’s キャッシュレス・消費者還元事業 (cashless consumer rebate program, October 2019 to June 2020) admitted only providers that charged small merchants 3.25% or less, with the state reimbursing a third of that fee.

FeliCa, Suica, and the prepaid empire

Contactless payment in Japan runs on FeliCa, a technology developed by Sony, standardized as JIS X 6319-4, and known in the NFC world as Type F (NFC-F). EMV contactless cards use Types A and B instead. FeliCa transmits at 212 or 424 kbit/s, a speed chosen to keep up with the flow of passengers through Tokyo’s subway gates. That transit requirement is what the whole Japanese prepaid ecosystem was built on. A Japanese point-of-sale terminal must therefore handle three radio technologies, A, B, and F, plus barcode scanning.

2001
Suica and Edy launch FeliCa prepaid
East Japan Railway Company (JR East) launches Suica for transit. The same year, bitWallet launches Edy, now Rakuten Edy, the first FeliCa e-money designed for retail.
2005
NFC in phones, ten years before Apple Pay
NTT Docomo launches iD, and JCB launches QUICPay. Both are postpaid contactless schemes, linked to a credit card and built into phones under the name おサイフケータイ (“wallet phone”).
2007
Retailers issue their own money
nanaco (Seven Card Service, part of Seven & i) and WAON (AEON Financial Service) launch retailer prepaid cards, accepted well beyond their own stores. PASMO joins Suica the same year.
2013
Ten transit cards, fully interoperable
A nationwide agreement links Suica, PASMO, ICOCA, TOICA, SUGOCA, Kitaca, manaca, PiTaPa, nimoca, and はやかけん. A card bought in Fukuoka works in Sapporo. The whole system runs on FeliCa. PiTaPa (Kansai) is the only postpaid card in the group.
March 2025
Suica opens up to visitors
JR East launches Welcome Suica Mobile for iPhone, valid for 180 days, with Shinkansen ticket purchases added from fall 2025.
November 11, 2025
“Suica Renaissance,” phase two
JR East announces code payments in the Mobile Suica app for fall 2026, a top-up limit raised to ¥300,000 from ¥20,000, merged Suica zones in spring 2027, and a move to a server-based architecture.
112M
Suica cards issued, including 33M Mobile Suica accounts
JR East, 2025
¥6T
Japanese e-money volume in 2025, or 3.7% of cashless payments
METI, March 31, 2026
¥20,000 → ¥300,000
announced increase in the Mobile Suica top-up limit, fall 2026
JR East, “Suica Renaissance” press release, November 11, 2025
10
regional prepaid schemes interoperable nationwide since 2013
交通系ICカード全国相互利用, agreement among rail operators
⚠️
The question to ask before ordering a terminal
A contactless EMV terminal imported from Europe or North America cannot read Suica, iD, or QUICPay, because it does not implement Type F. Accepting these instruments requires a FeliCa-certified reader, the biggest hardware cost of a Japanese launch. Type F lives in the reader’s radio layer, so a terminal fleet ordered without certification has to be replaced, not updated. Consumers long faced the mirror-image constraint on their phones. Apple added FeliCa to iPhones sold in Japan starting with the iPhone 7 in 2016, then to its entire global lineup.

Prepaid is shrinking but not disappearing. Squeezed between credit cards and barcode payments, it is the only Japanese payment instrument whose volume fell in METI’s 2025 statistics. Two use cases keep it alive, and nothing can replace it in them today. Transit gates need a transaction speed that barcodes cannot match. Small in-person payments also remain prepaid territory, for age groups that credit cards do not reach. A station shop that does not take Suica shuts out commuters, who already use their cards to get through the gates. The November 2025 announcement points the other way: JR East is turning Suica into a general-purpose wallet, with barcode payments and a higher limit.

PayPay, barcode payments, and the JPQR standard

Code payments are in-store payments made by scanning a barcode or QR code, displayed either by the merchant or by the customer on their phone. They totaled ¥16.6 trillion in 2025, or 10.2% of Japanese cashless payments (METI). PayPay, launched in late 2018 by PayPay Corporation (SoftBank / LY Corporation group), dominates the segment. It won the open battle of 2018 to 2025 with a points-rebate campaign more aggressive than anything else in the region. The company listed on Nasdaq on March 12, 2026. For the fiscal year ended March 2026, it reported ¥380.7 billion in operating revenue, up 27%, and 73.4 million registered users. More than 40 million of them have completed electronic identity verification.

¥16.6T
code payment volume in Japan in 2025, or 10.2% of cashless payments
METI, March 31, 2026
73.4M
registered PayPay users at the end of March 2026, up 7% year over year
PayPay Corporation, results for the fiscal year ended March 2026
¥380.7B
PayPay operating revenue for the fiscal year ended March 2026 (+27%); adjusted EBITDA of ¥111.1 billion
PayPay Corporation, results for the fiscal year ended March 2026
March 12, 2026
PayPay’s Nasdaq listing
PayPay Corporation, 2026
Accepting code payments in Japan: two setups and what they cost
Merchant-presented code
The customer scans the printed code
The customer enters the amount and confirms on screen. No hardware cost, but little control over the amount
Customer-presented code
The register scans the phone
The register pushes the amount. Requires a scanner and integration with the POS software
Wallet
Debits the balance, the linked card, or the phone bill
The funding source changes the real cost to the wallet issuer
Merchant
Receives a periodic payout
Each wallet sets its own payout schedule and minimum payout threshold
WalletOperatorSinceWhat drives itLicense type
PayPayPayPay Corporation (SoftBank / LY Corporation)2018Huge rebates, then network effects; absorbed LINE Pay JapanLive; first choice
Rakuten PayRakuten Payment, Inc.2016The Rakuten ecosystem and Rakuten Points, a near-currency in JapanLive
d払いNTT Docomo2018d POINT and carrier billingLive
au PAYKDDI2019au PAY Card and the digital bank au Jibun BankLive
MerpayMerpay, Inc. (Mercari group)2019Sales balance on the Mercari marketplace; メルペイスマート払い deferred paymentLive
Bank PayJapan Electronic Payment Promotion Organization (JEPPO)2020Direct debit from the bank account, built on J-DebitLive, low adoption
ゆうちょPay株式会社ゆうちょ銀行–Japan Post Bank accountShutdown announced for December 2026; drop it from your planning
LINE Pay (Japan)LY Corporation2014–Discontinued April 30, 2025; LINE Pay is still active in Taiwan as a separate entity
Origami PayOrigami Inc.2016–Discontinued in 2020, acquired by Mercari; a pioneer knocked out by the rebate war
7paySeven Pay Co. (Seven & i)2019–Launched July 1, 2019, shut down September 30, 2019, after a mass account takeover
The Japanese wallets a merchant has to choose among, as of mid-2026

The Payments Japan Association (キャッシュレス推進協議会) created JPQR in 2019, at METI’s urging, so merchants would not have to display ten different codes. One code serves several providers, which remain separate behind it. The international extension is JPQR Global. Launched on July 5, 2025, at the Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai site, it links JPQR to foreign QR standards: first KHQR (Cambodia), then QRIS (Indonesia) from August 17, 2025. Visitors from Southeast Asia can now pay in Japan with their home wallet, for the first time without a private gateway.

🔑
The only trade-off that matters for a Japanese merchant
The table above reads in order of adoption. A merchant that accepts just one code accepts PayPay. The second is usually Rakuten Pay, for points-driven customers. Beyond two wallets, the binding constraint becomes the reconciliation workload. Each wallet sets its own payout schedule, threshold, and statement format, so three wallets mean three cash cycles to reconcile every month. JPQR unifies the code at the register, but not the statements, which remain specific to each provider.

Konbini, deferred payment, and paper bills

コンビニ収納代行 (konbini bill payment) lets customers pay a bill that carries a barcode or payment number at a convenience store. The service has existed since 1987. The buyer orders online, then pays cash at the register of a 7-Eleven, FamilyMart, or Lawson. In fiscal 2022, the chains collected 1.09 billion payments worth ¥13 trillion through this channel, according to a document the 日本フランチャイズチェーン協会 (Japan Franchise Association) presented to a working group of the 規制改革推進会議 (Regulatory Reform Promotion Council) on October 9, 2024. Japan’s convenience stores thus form a cash collection network, and the country’s entire deferred payment market rests on it.

How an online purchase paid at a konbini works, end to end
Buyer
Orders without paying
Chooses “pay later” or “pay at a convenience store” at checkout
Deferred payment provider
Decides in seconds and guarantees the seller
Net Protections, Paidy, or similar: decision based on behavioral data, without a full credit check
Merchant
Ships immediately
The provider carries the nonpayment risk, not the seller
Buyer
Receives a 払込票 (payment slip) or payment number
Paper slip in the package, or code sent by text or email
Konbini
Collects payment, often in cash
The register scans the barcode; the paper stub is kept and later shipped to a processing center
Provider
Pays out to the merchant
Periodic payout net of fees, after collections are consolidated
🧾
NP後払い (Net Protections, 2002)
The global pioneer of invoice-based deferred payment in e-commerce, 15 years before European players entered the business. The seller is guaranteed and the buyer pays on delivery. Also offers atone for recurring accounts.
📱
Paidy (2014), a PayPal subsidiary since 2021
Deferred payment with no card and no full upfront credit check. The buyer pays a consolidated monthly bill, often in cash at a konbini. Acquired by PayPal for $2.7 billion.
🛍️
メルペイスマート払い (Merpay)
Deferred payment backed by the seller’s sales balance on the Mercari marketplace. Users spend what they have sold, then settle up. A way of funding a wallet with no equivalent outside Japan.
📶
キャリア決済 (carrier billing)
d払い / ドコモ払い (NTT Docomo), auかんたん決済 (KDDI), まとめて支払い (SoftBank). The amount is added to the phone bill. A full-fledged payment method for digital content, games, and subscriptions.
🔑
Why Japanese deferred payment is not Western-style BNPL
The dominant model is pay on delivery, in a single payment against an invoice, rather than a split into three or four installments. Two factors explain this. Trust in delivery is so high that paying after receipt is taken for granted. And the konbini offers an always-open cash payment point within a few minutes’ walk of almost anywhere. Installment credit therefore plays a smaller role than elsewhere. Convenience store payment serves an entire segment of shoppers, including those without a card they can use online, and a merchant that does not offer this channel cannot reach them.
⚠️
The channel is solid, but its economics no longer are
収納代行 (bill payment collection) is a burden on the chains. Handling paper 払込票 stubs, from transport to archiving to time at the register, costs more than it earns on a small bill. In February 2026, the Japanese business press reported on efforts to go paperless, notably at Lawson. The goal is a digital payment code, sent by message and shown at the register with no printed stub. A collection flow built today on paper alone risks breaking within a few years. Designing for both forms from the start, the 払込票 and the digital code, costs little and avoids a full rebuild if the paper stub goes away.

The FSA, METI, and the licenses you need

Japanese payments law grants authorizations by function, with no single license covering the whole business. Two agencies share the field. The FSA (金融庁) administers the 資金決済法 (Payment Services Act) and the 銀行法 (Banking Act), with applications reviewed by the Ministry of Finance’s local finance bureaus. METI administers the 割賦販売法 (Installment Sales Act), and therefore credit cards and deferred payment. One company may fall under both, and the initial classification turns on what it does: hold a balance, transfer funds, or sign up merchants on an issuer’s behalf.

RegimeLegal basisWhat it allowsKey constraint
前払式支払手段 (prepaid)資金決済法Issue a balance that is funded before it is spent (gift cards, retailer prepaid)Notification once unused balances exceed ¥10 million on the reference date; security deposit of at least half the outstanding balance
資金移動業 type 2資金決済法Transfer funds, capped at ¥1,000,000 per transactionThe regime for nearly all Japanese wallets; registration
資金移動業 type 1資金決済法Transfer funds with no amount capRegistration plus approval of a business implementation plan; limits on how long funds may be held
資金移動業 type 3資金決済法Transfer funds, capped at ¥50,000Lighter regime, created for small amounts
電子決済手段等取引業資金決済法 (Payment Services Act) as amended, in force since June 2023Issue or trade stablecoins backed by fiat currencyStablecoins are separated from crypto-assets and brought under payments law
クレジットカード番号等取扱契約締結事業者割賦販売法Sign up merchants for card acceptance (acquirers and PSPs)Register kept by METI; duty to vet affiliated merchants and fix their practices
電子決済等代行業者銀行法Initiate payments or aggregate bank account dataRegistration and a signed contract with each target bank
Regimes that apply to a payments company in Japan
⚠️
Japanese prepaid requires a deposit, not just safeguarding
The 前払式支払手段 (prepaid payment instrument) regime is tested on two reference dates each year, March 31 and September 30. If unused balances exceed ¥10 million on either date, the issuer must notify the regulator. It must then lodge an issuance security deposit of at least half that balance with the legal affairs bureau (法務局), or sign an equivalent protection agreement, within two months of the reference date. The calculation covers all of an issuer’s instruments combined, not each product separately. A gift card program whose balance crosses the threshold therefore ties up cash within two months of the first reference date on which it does.
June 1, 2018
The 電子決済等代行業者 regime
The June 2, 2017, amendment to the 銀行法 (Banking Act) takes effect. Registration becomes mandatory, as does a contract with each bank. Banks must publish a cooperation policy, but are only required to make best efforts to open APIs.
2018
Amendment to the 割賦販売法
Creates the register of acquirers and PSPs, a duty to vet affiliated merchants, and a ban on storing card data without PCI DSS compliance.
May 1, 2021
資金移動業 splits into three classes
Types 1, 2, and 3: no cap, ¥1,000,000, and ¥50,000 per transaction, respectively. Type 1 requires an additional approval.
June 2023
Stablecoins come under payments law
The amended 資金決済法 creates a category of 電子決済手段 (electronic payment instruments), separate from crypto-assets, for tokens backed by fiat currency.
August 18, 2025
JPYC, the first yen stablecoin
JPYC is registered as a 資金移動業者 (funds transfer provider) under number 関東財務局長第00099号. Public issuance opens on October 27, 2025. The structure is a funds transfer license, not a bank deposit.
April 2023 →
The digital yen is still at the pilot stage
The Bank of Japan runs a Pilot Program that brings in the private sector through a CBDC Forum, after two proof-of-concept phases. No decision to issue has been made, and the BoJ says any launch would require legislation and public debate.
🔑
Account access in Japan is contractual, not regulatory
電子決済等代行業者 status lets a firm operate, but does not on its own give it access to accounts. For that, the provider must sign a contract with each institution whose payments it wants to initiate or whose accounts it wants to read. Banks must publish a cooperation policy and make efforts to expose APIs, a best-efforts duty rather than a guaranteed outcome. Each connection is therefore negotiated separately, over several weeks. The timeline of a Japanese aggregation project depends on how many institutions it targets, and has to be planned bank by bank.