Reference🌏 Payments in Asia-PacificIntermediate⏱ 26 min read

🇧🇩 Payments in Bangladesh

bKash and the mobile financial services model that absorbed everything, Nagad under the postal service and in administration, the NPSB run by the central bank itself, Binimoy and interoperability imposed by circular, TakaPay to stem foreign currency outflows, $35.6 billion in migrant remittances, and the foreign exchange quotas that decide every payment acceptance project

Mobile financial services: 239 million accounts, 4% of value spent at merchants

Mobile financial services (MFS) are payment accounts held with an institution and used from a mobile phone, backed by an agent network for cash deposits and withdrawals. Bangladesh put MFS under *the bank-led model from the start, and kept it longer than most countries where the service took off. Bangladesh Bank grants the MFS license to a commercial bank*, not to a mobile network operator as in Kenya or Ghana. The license-holding bank runs the service through a dedicated subsidiary, which does not hold the license itself. The official register lists 14 services at 13 banks. Yet subscribers are concentrated in three brands, which together account for more than 80%.

239.24M
registered MFS accounts (2,392.40 lakh), of which 137.88M held by men and 101.02M by women
Bangladesh Bank, MFS data, February 2025
87.15M
active accounts, meaning at least one transaction in the previous three months
Bangladesh Bank, MFS data, February 2025
1 856 190
MFS agents in the country
Bangladesh Bank, MFS data, February 2025
671.3M
MFS transactions in February 2025 alone, worth BDT 164,726.30 crore (≈ BDT 1,647 billion)
Bangladesh Bank, MFS data, February 2025

Bangladesh Bank publishes a monthly breakdown of MFS transaction value by product, which shows how the service is actually used. The picture differs from what the number of open accounts would suggest. It describes a system used first to move cash in and out, secondarily for person-to-person transfers, and hardly at all to pay merchants.

ProductValue (BDT crore)Share of value
Cash out (cash withdrawal at an agent)51 213,3031,1 %
Cash in (cash deposit at an agent)45 726,3227,8 %
P2P (person-to-person transfer)41 778,9125,4 %
Other9 351,645,7 %
Merchant payments6 922,674,2 %
Salary disbursement5 075,833,1 %
Utility bill payments2 267,891,4 %
Inward remittances credited to a wallet1 268,390,8 %
Government payments1 121,350,7 %
MFS transaction value by product, total BDT 164,726.30 crore (Bangladesh Bank, February 2025)
🔑
Cash-out funds the network and holds back merchant payments
Cash deposits and withdrawals together account for 58.9% of the value flowing through Bangladeshi MFS. The cash-out fee pays the 1.86 million agents and funds the network’s reach. Merchant payments account for just 4.2%. Agents earn their income on withdrawals, so every taka spent electronically at a merchant is a withdrawal that never happens, and an agent commission that disappears. As long as the network is paid on withdrawals, merchant payments have no built-in reason to grow. An acceptance project runs into no technical barrier here. It runs into the business model of the very partner that would have to distribute it.

Multiple account holding means one person holding several accounts, which inflates the account count without adding users. The country has about 175 million people and 239 million registered MFS accounts, only 87 million of which were active over three months. It is common for one person to hold a bKash account, a Nagad account, and a bank’s mobile banking account. Sizing based on reported accounts overstates the addressable base two- to threefold. The only usable metrics are transaction volumes and 30- or 90-day active users. The partner holds this data, so access to it must be a contract term, secured before signing, not a reporting annex produced later.

bKash, Nagad, Rocket: who is behind each brand

According to Bangladesh Bank, three brands account for more than 80% of the country’s MFS subscribers. Each rests on a different legal structure, so the entity that signs a commitment has a different status from one brand to the next. bKash is a commercial company controlled by a bank. Nagad is a postal service, placed under central bank administration. Rocket is a banking product backed by a single commercial bank. The applicable liability regime follows from that status, and it does not carry over from one brand to another.

ServiceOperating entityOwnershipWhat due diligence must establish
bKashbKash LimitedControlled by BRAC Bank PLC; shareholders include Ant Group, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, IFC, Money in Motion, and SoftBank Vision FundBangladesh Bank MFS license. International shareholders to be disclosed for sanctions and beneficial ownership checks. Claims more than 82 million verified users (bKash, 2025 announcement)
NagadNagad LimitedBangladesh Post Office, under section 3(2) of the 2010 amendment to the Post Office ActPostal, nonbank legal basis: the MFS licensing regime does not bind it in the same way. Under central bank administration since August 2024
RocketDutch-Bangla Bank PLCMobile banking service of a commercial bankThe contract is with a bank, not a fintech. Full bank prudential regime
উপায় (Upay)UCB Fintech Company Ltd.United Commercial BankSecond-tier player. Size the deal on actual volumes, never on the size of the country
Trust And Pay (tap)Trust And Pay Ltd.Trust BankThe entity listed in the central bank register is Trust And Pay Ltd., not the “Trust Axiata Digital” joint venture that is still often cited. A contract drafted under the old name refers to an obsolete legal name
Bangladesh’s MFS operators and who actually stands behind them
⚠️
Nagad: central bank administration and a suspended banking license
On August 21, 2024, Bangladesh Bank dissolved Nagad’s board and appointed an administrator, supported by six central bank officials. A five-member management board was installed on September 17, 2024. That same month, the central bank suspended the digital bank license of Nagad Digital Bank PLC, granted in June 2024, while it reviewed how the license had been awarded. A World Bank Group diagnostic report from May 2025 found favoritism in the award of these licenses. Any multiyear commitment by Nagad therefore goes through a body appointed by the regulator, which can be removed and whose mandate is to redefine strategy. An exclusivity or co-investment deal signed during this period depends on a body whose makeup can change before the contract ends.

On customer pricing, bKash’s public fee schedule is the market benchmark. Cash-out costs 1.85% at a standard agent, via the app or the USSD code *247#, and 1.49% at a Priyo Agent or an ATM. Merchant payments are free for the customer, because the merchant pays the acceptance fee instead. That gap between a charged withdrawal and a free payment is the pricing incentive operators use to shift usage from withdrawals to commerce. The incentive has not changed the volume mix. Merchant payments are still 4.2% of value.

Distribution of MFS in Bangladesh relies on the agent networks of these three brands. No foreign firm has a comparable network in Bangladesh, and rebuilding a 1.86 million-point network is not a fundable project. Entering this market therefore means a partnership with an established operator, not head-on competition. Negotiations then turn on three points: the share of the cash-out fee, access to transaction data, and the length of exclusivity. The third is the most fragile legally with Nagad, whose governance rests with a body appointed by the regulator.

NPSB, BEFTN, Binimoy: interoperability imposed by circular

On October 13, 2025, Bangladesh Bank issued a circular on payment account interoperability. From November 1, 2025, all banks, MFS operators, and PSPs must route any-account-to-any-account transfers through the NPSB: bank to MFS, MFS to MFS, and PSPs included. A bKash-to-Nagad transfer, which did not exist before that date, is now mandatory, just like a transfer between two banks. The circular does three things. It makes the rail mandatory, it sets prices by category of institution, and it bans charging the recipient.

October 2010
BACPS
Check truncation and image clearing. Paper checks stop moving between banks.
February 2011
BEFTN
The country’s first paperless interbank electronic transfer system. It becomes the rail for salaries and social transfers.
2011
bKash and Rocket
The first two mobile financial services launch under the bank-led model.
2012
NPSB
The national switch goes live: ATMs, POS, and interbank online transfers.
October 2015
BD-RTGS
Real-time gross settlement, multicurrency from day one, in taka, US dollars, euros, pounds sterling, and Canadian dollars.
2019
Nagad
The postal service launches its offering on a postal legal basis, separate from the MFS licensing regime.
2020
Bangla QR
National QR standard on the NPSB platform, designed to absorb proprietary QR codes.
November 1, 2023
TakaPay
The national card scheme launches with Sonali Bank, City Bank, and BRAC Bank. Stated goal: reduce foreign currency outflows.
November 4, 2024
Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2024
The law that finally gives payment systems and licenses a dedicated legal basis takes effect.
November 1, 2025
Full interoperability
Any account to any account through the NPSB, with fee caps set by the central bank.
An interoperable transfer in Bangladesh since November 1, 2025
Sending customer
Initiates a transfer from a bank account, an MFS wallet, or a PSP account
The institution must display the fee **before** execution; the circular explicitly requires it
Sending institution
Charges its fee, up to the cap for its category
0.15% for a bank, 0.20% for an MFS operator, 0.85% for a PSP, VAT included
NPSB
Routes the transaction to the receiving institution, whatever its category
The central bank’s switch is the mandatory route: no alternative bilateral arrangement is allowed
Receiving institution
Credits the recipient
**No fee may be charged to the recipient**; the circular prohibits it
Bangladesh Bank
Settles positions between participants
Amount limits apply by account type; the fee schedule for internet banking transfers is set by PSD Circular No. 02 of February 6, 2025
Sending institution categoryMaximum feeCharged to
Bank0,15 %Sender only
Mobile financial services (MFS) operator0,20 %Sender only
Payment service provider (PSP)0,85 %Sender only
Recipient, all categoriesNo fee allowed–
Fee caps on interoperable NPSB transfers, VAT included (Bangladesh Bank circular of October 13, 2025, effective November 1, 2025)
⚠️
A regulatory mandate is not adoption
Bangla QR is the national QR standard. A circular made it mandatory, and all proprietary QR codes must migrate or face penalties. Volume recorded at the deadline came to 77,165 transactions worth BDT 22.02 crore on June 30 and July 1, 2026 (Bangladesh Bank / BSS). For a population of 175 million, that is next to nothing. The rail is live and the mandate is in force, but usage has not followed, because the cash-out economics that pay for distribution were left untouched. The volume of a Bangladeshi payment instrument should therefore be read from published statistics. It cannot be inferred from a regulatory mandate or an effective date.

Binimoy is the alias platform linking banks, MFS operators, and PSPs, billed at launch as “Bangladesh’s UPI.” Official half-year data credit it with 217,213 transactions worth BDT 76.03 crore in the first half of 2025, or 0.00% of both volume and value across all of the country’s platforms. BEFTN alone processed 184 million transactions over the same period. Binimoy works, but its share rounds to zero on both measures. Nor does it appear among the systems the central bank lists as operational on its dedicated page. Its share of national flows does not justify ranking it among the country’s core rails, alongside BEFTN and the NPSB.

Cards: an urban niche and a drain on foreign currency

In Bangladesh, the payment card is an urban, salaried, and largely withdrawal-driven instrument, not a mass-market one. Bangladesh Bank publishes a monthly statistical review of card usage, in more detail than most central banks provide, broken down by sector, card type, and country of spend. That review is the source of the figures below, rather than vendor estimates or regional extrapolations.

39.79M
debit cards in circulation in April 2026, up from 23.04M in May 2021
Bangladesh Bank, Statistics Department, April 2026
2.72M
credit cards in circulation in April 2026, up from 1.72M in May 2021
Bangladesh Bank, Statistics Department, April 2026
8.30M
prepaid cards in April 2026, up from 0.87M in May 2021, the fastest-growing segment
Bangladesh Bank, Statistics Department, April 2026
BDT 498,175M
monthly card transaction value in April 2026, up from BDT 243,713M in May 2021 (+104% in five years)
Bangladesh Bank, Statistics Department, April 2026

The spending breakdown confirms the niche profile. In April 2026, domestic credit card transactions reached BDT 38,683 million, 49.24% of it at department stores. Nearly half of card usage is concentrated in a single type of merchant. Credit actually drawn on cards is also marginal nationwide. Limits granted by 48 banks and one NBFC total BDT 412.95 billion, against BDT 140.45 billion outstanding at the end of April 2026. Utilization is therefore around one-third. Bangladeshi cardholders use credit cards to pay for purchases, and make little use of the credit line attached.

FlowValueDetails
Outbound: Bangladeshi cards used abroad≈ BDT 8.00B ($65.20M)Credit BDT 4,244M (716,068 transactions), debit BDT 3,269M (720,028), prepaid BDT 490M (122,727)
Inbound: foreign cards used in Bangladesh≈ BDT 3.29B ($26.77M)Up 3.02% month over month and 25.39% year over year
Ratio2.44×Bangladeshi cardholders spend 2.44 times more abroad than foreign cardholders spend in Bangladesh
Cross-border card flows, April 2026 (Bangladesh Bank, Statistics Department)

TakaPay is Bangladesh’s national card scheme, launched on November 1, 2023, with Sonali Bank, City Bank, and BRAC Bank, on the NPSB platform the central bank already runs. It was created in response to the gap between what Bangladeshi cardholders spend abroad and what foreign cardholders spend in Bangladesh. The goal is to stop paying international networks’ scheme fees in foreign currency on purely domestic transactions whose settlement involves no currency conversion. Its purpose is macroeconomic first and commercial second. A co-badge with RuPay has been announced for flows between India and Bangladesh. It would be the first intraregional card link in South Asia, but so far it remains an announcement.

ℹ️
What TakaPay means for an acquirer
A TakaPay card is strictly domestic. It does not work outside Bangladesh and does not accept foreign currency transactions. For a merchant based in the country, it lowers the cost of acceptance, since scheme fees remain payable in taka. For a foreign merchant selling remotely to Bangladeshi customers, it is unusable, because these cards settle no transactions outside the country. Bangladeshi cardholders therefore fall into two groups: those with co-badged or dual-currency international cards, the only ones that can pay abroad, and those with domestic cards, which cannot.

Exchange controls: quotas, supporting documents, and card limits

The taka is subject to exchange controls, a regime under which every transaction with a foreign party requires a foreign currency entitlement and supporting documents. Controls apply transaction by transaction, on documents, through licensed banks known as *authorized dealers (ADs), which the central bank tasks with checking the paperwork. The constraint this regime places on a payment acceptance project concerns cash management, and is almost never technical. The exchange rate regime, on the other hand, changed recently. A crawling peg band was introduced in May 2024 around a central rate of BDT 117 per dollar. Bangladesh Bank let the market set the rate on May 8, 2025*, a condition of a $4.7 billion IMF program. The taka now floats. The quotas have not changed.

Bangladesh Bank’s Guidelines for Foreign Exchange Transactions set what a resident can take out of the country, and through which instrument. The annual travel quota falls under chapter 12, paragraph 1(ii). It is $5,000 per calendar year for SAARC countries and Myanmar, and $7,000 per calendar year for the rest of the world. The amount released must be endorsed on the traveler’s passport in indelible ink, with the branch stamp, and reported to the central bank’s Online Foreign Exchange Transaction Monitoring System. A departing passenger may carry only BDT 10,000 in cash, regardless of the travel quota released to them.

  • International card (chapter 19, para. 1): usable only against a closed list of entitlements (travel quota, exporter ERQ account balance, RFCD account, Hajj quota, official mission, business travel quota, private foreign currency account, entitlements of IT companies that are BASIS members).
  • Online payments by international card (chapter 19, para. 17): capped at $300 per transaction, charged against the unused travel quota, plus an additional $1,000 per year at most.
  • IT companies that are BASIS members (chapter 19, para. 11): $6,000 per card, within an envelope of $30,000 per calendar year per company, on the association’s recommendation.
  • Virtual card for app and game developers (chapter 19, para. 13): $300 per calendar year, against proof of training or participation.
  • Card linked to an exporter ERQ account (chapter 19, para. 2a): up to three executives, with a single issuing bank, for the exporting company’s business expenses.
  • Reporting (chapter 19, para. 20): monthly statement of international cards to the Foreign Exchange Operation Department, and ongoing reporting to the Online International Card Monitoring System.
⚠️
A $300 per-transaction cap kills cross-border subscriptions
A foreign software vendor charging a Bangladeshi customer by card is capped at $300 per transaction, and the cardholder’s annual total is limited to their remaining travel quota plus $1,000. A $1,500 annual software subscription is not payable by a Bangladeshi individual with a standard international card, however well-off they are. Declines on this corridor come from exchange controls applied by the issuing bank, which carries its own regulatory liability, not from fraud scoring. Tuning the checkout flow will not change them. The possible fixes are structural: local invoicing in taka, a local entity, or a B2B model under a services import license.

In the other direction, collection rules for Bangladeshi service exporters have been eased. A July 2026 circular from the Foreign Exchange Policy Department raises the amount that can be received through an *Online Payment Gateway Service Provider (OPGSP) to $10,000 per transaction. It covers three activities: data entry and processing, offshore IT services, and business process outsourcing. Platform statements and emails are now accepted as proof, in place of the standard export documentation required for goods. Foreign currency retention quotas complete the setup. An IT freelancer keeps 50% of foreign currency earnings, and other service exporters 30%*.

Migrant remittances, the country’s largest payment system

Migrant remittances are the money that workers abroad send home to their households. In Bangladesh, they finance the balance of payments and feed foreign exchange reserves, and since 2024 they have spared the country an external liquidity crisis. No domestic payment rail weighs as much in the country’s external balance. The Gulf–South Asia corridor is the largest in the world by volume, and Bangladesh is one of its three main destinations, along with India and Pakistan. On the sending side, the channel is still overwhelmingly physical: exchange houses, cash, and migrant worker payroll. On the receiving side, it is digital. The corridor’s cost structure follows from that asymmetry, with costs concentrated in the physical half of the chain.

$35.56B
remittances received in FY2025–26, an all-time record
Bangladesh Bank, July 2026
$30.33B
remittances received in FY2024–25, the first time above $30B (+25.5%)
Bangladesh Bank, FY2024–25
$2,816.96M
remittances in June 2026 alone, or BDT 345.81 billion (provisional data)
Bangladesh Bank, monthly remittance statistics
5,26 %
remittances as a share of GDP in 2023, the latest year available
World Bank, indicator BX.TRF.PWKR.DT.GD.ZS
How a remittance travels from the Gulf to Bangladesh
Migrant worker
Deposits cash at an exchange house in the Gulf
Physical sending dominates: exchange houses in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. The wage itself often arrives through a local wage protection system
Exchange house
Passes the order to its correspondent bank or Bangladeshi partner
Drawing arrangement with a licensed Bangladeshi bank or an MFS operator
Bangladeshi authorized dealer bank (AD)
Converts to taka at the market rate and credits the beneficiary
Since May 8, 2025, the market sets the rate, replacing the crawling peg band
Government of Bangladesh
Adds the government incentive to the beneficiary’s credit
**2.5%** of the amount since 2022, up from 2% when the scheme was introduced in 2019, provided the remittance came through a legal channel
Recipient
Withdraws cash at an agent, or keeps the money in the wallet
Withdrawal is still the dominant outcome: cash-out accounts for 31.1% of Bangladeshi MFS value (Bangladesh Bank, February 2025)

The 2.5% government incentive serves as *a tool to compete with hundi***, the informal settlement system that bypasses the banking channel and deprives the country of the corresponding foreign currency. The operator that captures the legal flow earns a premium, and bKash adds a commercial bonus that stacks on top of the government incentive. The scheme costs Bangladesh’s budget on the order of BDT 7,000 crore a year, or roughly $580 million, a figure regularly debated in the local public discussion. Scrapping it is a recurring political possibility. That would immediately change the economics of remittance partnerships, whose margins rely partly on this premium.

🔑
Remittance corridor compliance is decided at the sending end, not the receiving end
The receiving end in Bangladesh is regulated, traced, and reported. The sending end is not always held to the same standard. A remittance partnership into Bangladesh therefore exposes a European or North American institution to the rules of the sending country, such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, or Italy, far more than to Bangladeshi rules. The due diligence to document covers the worker’s source of funds, the exchange house’s license, and the drawing arrangement with the Bangladeshi bank. The power to sanction failures on these points lies with the sending country’s authority, not with Bangladesh Bank.

Garments: letters of credit, back-to-back LCs, and factory payroll

Ready-made garments are Bangladesh’s export economy, and they shape its business payments. In FY2024–25, ready-made garment exports reached $39.35 billion, up 8.84%, out of total exports of $48.28 billion. More than 80% of export earnings therefore come from a single sector, exposed to demand from a handful of import markets. FY2025–26 saw a decline to $38.70 billion, down 1.64% from the previous year. Bangladesh’s business payment instruments were designed around this sector because of that concentration, and they fit poorly with trade outside it.

MarketValueShare
European Union$19.71B50,10 %
United States$7.54B19,18 %
United Kingdom$4.35B11,05 %
Canada$1.30B3,31 %
Other markets≈ $6.45B≈ 16,36 %
Destinations of Bangladesh’s ready-made garment exports, FY2024–25 (BGMEA / Export Promotion Bureau)

The core instrument is the back-to-back LC, short for *back-to-back letter of credit*. The Bangladeshi exporter receives a letter of credit from its foreign buyer, then opens a second letter of credit against it to import fabric and trims. It ties up none of its own cash. The structure rests entirely on the strength of the original letter of credit, and it concentrates risk on the Bangladeshi bank that issues the second one. Checks, for their part, remain legally strong in domestic business-to-business payments, cleared through BACPS since 2010.

  • The Export Development Fund (EDF), created in 1989, provides foreign currency refinancing for raw material imports under back-to-back LCs. It was cut to $2.51 billion on October 29, 2023, after a special inspection conducted under the IMF program found illicit outflows. The general cap per exporter went from $15 million to $10 million, for 180 days at 4%.
  • The Export Facilitation Pre-finance Fund (EFPF), launched on January 1, 2023, has BDT 10,000 crore, in taka rather than foreign currency. Banks refinance through it, and exporters borrow for six months against back-to-back LCs, up to BDT 200 crore per company. Rates have since been raised closer to market levels.
  • ERQ accounts (Exporters’ Retention Quota). Exporters keep a share of their foreign currency earnings for business expenses, including through international cards linked to the account for up to three executives.
  • Multicurrency BD-RTGS. It settles domestic interbank transactions in US dollars, euros, pounds sterling, and Canadian dollars. A foreign currency settlement between two Bangladeshi banks therefore does not have to go through a foreign correspondent bank.

Paying factory workers is the garment sector’s second big payments challenge, and the first serious high-volume use case for MFS. Millions of accounts were opened to pay garment wages, backed by the government’s a2i program and the Better Than Cash Alliance. The central bank intervened through pricing rather than a usage mandate. During the 2020 pandemic, it capped cash-out on wages at 0.8% for disbursements under the government refinancing scheme. The disbursing bank bore 0.4%, and the worker only 0.4%. The cap applied only to that scheme, but 0.8% has remained the sector’s price benchmark.

ℹ️
Digitizing payroll does not digitize spending
Paying wages into a wallet carries the money as far as the agent’s counter, where it is withdrawn in cash. In the mix Bangladesh Bank reports, salary disbursement accounts for 3.1% of MFS value, and cash withdrawals for 31.1%. Wages come in digitally and go out as cash within hours. Digitizing payroll therefore increases account numbers and inflows, without generating electronic spending at merchants on its own.

Accepting payments online: mandatory escrow, gateways, and operational risk

Bangladesh overhauled its online payments framework after the 2021 e-commerce crisis. That year, several platforms took large advance payments without delivering, among them Evaly, eOrange, Qcoom, Dhamaka Shopping, and Alesha Mart. Hundreds of crores of taka were left stuck in payment gateways, and several criminal cases are still pending. At the time, no mechanism kept customer funds separate from platform funds. The regulatory response was fast and heavy-handed, and it has governed how customer advances are held ever since. Today it shapes every marketplace model.

The *Digital Commerce Operation Guidelines 2021 regulate customer advances. A platform may not take more than 10% of the product value in advance unless the payment goes through an escrow account approved by Bangladesh Bank. The escrow* mechanism, introduced in July 2021, holds the funds at the bank or financial institution until the seller provides proof of delivery. The seller then requests settlement, and the gateway releases the funds to the platform’s account. The resulting cash delay is written into the rule itself, and it has to be financed as working capital.

🏦
PSO license
Operator of a payment system between participants, gateway, or aggregator. The lead participant must be a scheduled bank or a financial company. SSLCOMMERZ, ShurjoPay (shurjoMukhi Limited), and aamarPay operate under this regime.
👛
PSP license
E-wallet or mobile wallet provider that serves end customers directly and settles their transactions through a bank. Issued by the Payment Systems Department under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2024.
📱
MFS license
Granted to a bank, which runs the service through a dedicated subsidiary. The register lists 14 services at 13 banks. The regime covers bKash, Rocket, tap, and Upay, but not Nagad, which has a postal legal basis.
🔐
E-commerce escrow
Required for advances above 10% of the product value. Funds released on proof of delivery. Build it into working capital needs in the business plan, not after go-live.

*Agent banking is a regime separate from MFS that allows a bank to delegate transactions to third-party outlets that remain under its responsibility. At the end of December 2025, deposits collected through this channel reached BDT 49,356 crore*, up 18.1% year over year, with BDT 40,876 crore coming from rural areas. Outstanding loans stood at BDT 11,755 crore, and 29 banks ran the channel. This network is the country’s second physical distribution grid, after MFS agents. It follows standard banking rules.

⚠️
Operational risk in Bangladesh is not hypothetical
On February 4, 2016, fraudulent payment instructions were sent over SWIFT against Bangladesh Bank’s account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Five orders were executed. $81 million reached Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation in Manila, and $20 million was routed to Sri Lanka and then stopped. The remaining instructions, worth several hundred million, were halted. Part of the money was never recovered, and the Philippine central bank imposed on RCBC the largest fine in its history. The episode had a lasting effect on the country’s correspondent banking terms, and on the level of due diligence required of any new entrant. Connecting to a Bangladeshi rail therefore requires a review of connection security and access segregation, and the project bears the cost.
  • Check the license, not the brand: ask for the PSO, PSP, or MFS license number and the entity name in Bangladesh Bank’s register. Trade names often differ from the registered legal name, and the mismatch can render a clause meaningless.
  • Require 30- and 90-day active users: registered accounts overstate the addressable base two- to threefold. Never size on the 239 million reported accounts.
  • Model the cash outflow: e-commerce escrow, foreign currency retention quotas, and repatriation timelines. Moving funds out of a Bangladeshi merchant account is a regulated, documented, and sometimes rationed process.
  • Don’t mistake a mandate for adoption: Bangla QR is mandatory and barely used; Binimoy rounds to 0.00% of national volume. The rail exists, and usage has to be measured separately.
  • Check the partner’s governance: Nagad has been run by a regulator-appointed body since August 2024, and its digital bank license is suspended. A multiyear exclusivity clause signed on that basis is fragile.
  • Map the foreign exchange caps before designing the checkout flow: $300 per online transaction for a resident cardholder. No amount of conversion optimization makes up for a regulatory cap.