Reference🌏 Payments in Asia-PacificIntermediate⏱ 26 min read

🇵🇰 Payments in Pakistan

Raast, PayPak, 1LINK, JazzCash, and Easypaisa: how to accept payments in a market of 240 million people where the central bank runs the instant payment rail itself, online commerce is paid account to account, and $41.6 billion in migrant remittances arrives every year, about half of it from the Gulf

A market of public rails, telecom wallets, and cash

Pakistan’s retail payments market covers transactions by individuals and merchants, whether they go through a digital channel or are made in cash. In five years, the country has built an instant payment infrastructure that few emerging markets can match. Yet cash has not retreated. In the January–March 2026 quarter, formal channels processed 3.7 billion retail transactions worth PKR 168.8 trillion (SBP, Quarterly Payment Systems Review Q3 FY26). That is a 9% rise in volume in a single quarter. Digital channels account for 92% of transactions by number, but only PKR 68.3 trillion by value, or about 40% of the total. A 92% share of the count against 40% of the value means the average digital transaction is far smaller than a transaction settled through any other channel. Large payments still move outside digital channels.

3.7B
retail transactions in the January–March 2026 quarter, worth PKR 168.8 trillion
SBP, Quarterly Payment Systems Review Q3 FY26
92 %
digital channels’ share of transaction volume, vs. ≈ 40% of value
SBP, Q3 FY26
132M
registered users of banking apps and wallets at the end of March 2026, up from 96M a year earlier
SBP, Q3 FY26
68.25M
payment cards in circulation, including 57.2M debit cards
SBP, Q3 FY26
≈ PKR 11.9T
notes in circulation as of July 24, 2026, against M2 money supply of PKR 46.46 trillion at the end of June 2026
SBP, weekly monetary statistics, 2026

The stock of notes in circulation kept growing as digital volumes rose, from about PKR 10.9 trillion in mid-2025 to nearly PKR 12 trillion a year later. The two curves are rising together. Digital payments have therefore grown on new use cases, without cutting existing cash use by the same amount. A collection plan that assumes cash will be replaced quickly is betting on a shift the 2025 and 2026 data do not show.

🔑
The regulator is also the operator, and sometimes the competitor
The State Bank of Pakistan supervises the sector, issues licenses, and operates both the PRISM+ RTGS system and the Raast instant payment rail. It caps the price of an interbank transfer by circular and subsidizes QR merchant payments. All of these roles sit with one institution. A private company entering this market therefore deals with a single counterpart: its supervisor, which also owns the infrastructure the company uses and sets the price for it. Its cost on that rail depends on a regulatory decision, not on a commercial negotiation with a third-party operator.

Five types of players share the market. Commercial banks come first, and a handful of them dominate merchant acquiring. The two microfinance banks backed by telecom operators, JazzCash and Easypaisa, have the largest user base. The interbank switch 1LINK, owned by a consortium of banks, also runs PayPak, the domestic card scheme. E-money institutions (EMIs), licensed since 2019, remain very few. The fifth player is the central bank itself, which operates Raast.

Raast: the central bank runs its own rail

Raast, launched by the SBP in 2021, is an instant payment rail that is free for consumers and addressable by alias. The Raast ID is the user’s mobile number, linked to an IBAN. A Raast transfer bypasses 1LINK’s private switch and settles directly in PRISM+, whereas a conventional interbank transfer goes through that fee-charging switch. Raast charges no interchange. Without interchange, the usual acquiring model loses a revenue source, since in that model the merchant’s fee also pays the issuer.

1995
NIFT
Launch of the check clearing house, run by a private company under SBP supervision.
1999
1LINK
The bank consortium launches the national switch with shared ATMs, followed by IBFT and bill payment.
2007
PS&EFT Act
The Payment Systems and Electronic Fund Transfers Act gives the SBP the legal basis to license and oversee payment systems.
2008
PRISM
The RTGS system goes live, combined with the central securities depository. It becomes the country’s single settlement point.
April 2016
PayPak
1LINK launches the domestic card scheme. Pakistan becomes the 28th country in the world to run its own card network.
2019
EMI regime
The SBP creates the e-money institution license, opening the door to firms that are neither banks nor telecom operators.
2021
Raast and Asaan Mobile Account
Public instant payment rail, free of charge; in December, account opening and transactions over USSD via *2262#, with no smartphone or data needed.
January 2025
First digital retail bank
The SBP grants Easypaisa Bank Limited the country’s first Digital Retail Bank license.
September 2025
Raast P2M subsidy
PKR 3.5 billion in public funding to subsidize QR merchant payments under the “Cashless Economy” program.
January 2026
Raast and exchange companies
Circular EPD No. 02 of January 15, 2026, allows licensed exchange companies to credit remittances directly through Raast.
June 2026
PayPak credit
1LINK announces the first domestic credit card, run with Euronet Pakistan under a managed service model.
742.1M
Raast transactions in the January–March 2026 quarter, worth PKR 23.27 trillion
SBP, Quarterly Payment Systems Review Q3 FY26
664M
of which person-to-person (up 10% quarter over quarter), worth PKR 18.88 trillion
SBP, Q3 FY26
55.9M
merchant (P2M) payments in the quarter, up from 36.3M the previous quarter
SBP, Q3 FY26
> 2.6M
merchants enrolled on Raast P2M at the end of March 2026
SBP, Q3 FY26
⚠️
P2M is one-twelfth the size of P2P, and the subsidy is running out
With 664 million person-to-person transfers against 55.9 million merchant payments in the same quarter, Raast is used twelve times more for transfers between people than for commerce. The authorities want to close that gap with a subsidy. It is worth 0.5% of the value of each Raast QR merchant payment, capped at PKR 100, paid to financial institutions and split equally between the merchant’s bank and the customer’s bank. It covers transactions made between September 1, 2025, and June 30, 2026, from a budget of PKR 3.5 billion. Institutions file claims quarterly with Raast Payments Pakistan, certified by their internal audit. The June 30, 2026, end date is written into the program itself. A business plan that treats the subsidy as a permanent source of revenue therefore assumes a renewal the current rules do not provide for.

A second driver of volume growth also comes from the state. In October 2025, the SBP announced its plan to route all government payments through Raast by the end of FY26. That covers public sector salaries, pensions, social transfers, and government collections. These flows land in accounts that then become active, and the resulting user base makes the rail usable for private-sector acceptance. Brazil and India used the same bootstrapping mechanism, with the state acting first as the anchor customer, then as the driver of adoption.

  • The number of active QR merchants rose from about 1.17 million in September 2025 to 2.5 million in March 2026 (SBP data reported in 2026). Enrollment is growing much faster than usage.
  • A Raast ID is not mandatory: the IBAN remains a valid address. Payment flows that require the alias exclude some payees.
  • Raast settles in central bank money, with no clearing window: Raast receipts are reconciled continuously, not against a daily settlement file.
  • No interchange is charged: apart from the public subsidy, there is no revenue stream shared between issuer and acquirer on this rail.

PayPak: a domestic card that stops at the border

PayPak, launched by 1LINK in April 2016, is the country’s only domestic card scheme. It claims 16.1 million cards in circulation, or about 28% of Pakistan’s card market (1LINK, 2025–2026). Its advantage is cost: domestic scheme fees and settlement in rupees, with no foreign currency flowing out to Visa or Mastercard. The case does not rest on features, which are the same as those of an international debit card used inside the country. In a country with tight foreign exchange reserves, keeping currency at home also matters to the monetary authorities, beyond the savings banks and merchants get from it.

CriterionPayPakVisa / MastercardWhat it means in practice
AcceptanceDomestic onlyDomestic and internationalA PayPak card cannot pay for travel or a purchase on a foreign website: banks co-badge or issue two cards
Cost for the acquirerDomestic interchange and scheme fees, significantly lowerInternational interchange, scheme fees billed in foreign currencyThe cost gap is the main lever when negotiating a local acceptance contract
Settlement currencyPKR, settled via 1LINK then PRISM+Settled outside Pakistan, FX exposurePayPak eliminates FX risk and the drain on reserves
Products availableMostly debit; domestic credit card announced in June 2026Debit, credit, prepaid, commercialIn 2026, revolving credit is still the preserve of international brands
Technical processing1LINK switch, domestic specificationInternational scheme specificationsA foreign processor must certify separately on 1LINK. It is not just a configuration change
Cards in Pakistan: how the three brands differ for issuers and merchants

The domestic scheme is now expanding into credit, a product that had been the preserve of the international brands. In June 2026, 1LINK announced the country’s first domestic credit card, run with Euronet Pakistan under a managed service model. Issuing and processing are fully outsourced, hosted on Euronet’s PCI-compliant infrastructure, and open to every SBP-licensed issuer. The setup targets mid-sized banks. They cannot justify the cost of their own credit platform, so this lets them launch the product without building one.

⚠️
The card base is built for withdrawals, not payments
In the January–March 2026 quarter, Pakistani cards were used for 272.2 million ATM withdrawals worth PKR 4.99 trillion. Terminals handled only 150.4 million transactions worth PKR 810 billion (SBP, Q3 FY26), a ratio of six to one by value. The Pakistani card is still overwhelmingly a way to get cash. The number of cards issued measures how widely the instrument has spread; terminal transactions measure its use as a payment method, and that use is one-sixth the size of withdrawals. Cardholders have the cards; the habit of paying by card is far less established.

The physical acceptance network remains thin for the size of the population: the country has about 248,000 payment terminals for some 217,000 registered merchants (SBP, Q3 FY26). The 2.5 million merchants that accept QR payments are more than ten times that number. The two setups do not cost the same to deploy. A terminal has to be bought, installed, and maintained, while a QR code is just an identifier displayed at the merchant. Public acceptance policy is built on that asymmetry.

JazzCash, Easypaisa, and the agent economy

Pakistan’s two dominant wallets are banks, not mere e-money issuers like their European counterparts. JazzCash (2012) is run by Mobilink Microfinance Bank, a subsidiary of the VEON/Jazz group. Easypaisa (2009), Pakistan’s mobile money pioneer, became the country’s first fully digital retail bank in 2025, with SBP approval. A microfinance bank license is the hallmark of the Pakistani model. Commercial negotiations are therefore held with a licensed bank, subject to prudential requirements and to the decision timelines that come with that status.

📶
JazzCash
About 21M monthly active users, 57M registered customers, and 850,000 merchants (company figures, 2025). Distribution relies on the subscriber base of Jazz, the country’s largest mobile operator.
🏦
Easypaisa Digital Bank
About 18M monthly active users, including ~14M on the app (company figures, 2025). First Digital Retail Bank license granted by the SBP, in January 2025.
🧑‍🌾
The agent network
Pakistan’s branchless banking relies on more than 700,000 agent locations, of which about 271,000 are active (SBP, Branchless Banking Statistics, April–June 2025). The gap between registered and active agents is the figure to model.
📞
Asaan Mobile Account
Launched on December 13, 2021, by the SBP and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority. Account opening and transactions over USSD via *2262#, on any phone and any carrier, with 13 providers.
95.8M
branchless banking app users in the January–March 2026 quarter
SBP, Q3 FY26
28.9M
users of conventional banking apps in the same quarter
SBP, Q3 FY26
7.3M
users of e-money institution wallets
SBP, Q3 FY26
> 10M
accounts opened via the Asaan Mobile Account USSD channel since 2021
World Economic Forum, 2026

The network pays agents per transaction, mainly for cash deposits and withdrawals, a different business model from a Western acquirer’s. As long as the recipient of a transfer withdraws the money at the counter, the margin is made on cash-out, and the digital rail only carries the funds. An operator that eliminates that withdrawal cuts into the income of its own distribution channel. This structural conflict explains why last-mile digitization is moving more slowly than aggregate volumes suggest.

⚠️
Easypaisa: a change-of-control clause is a must
Easypaisa Digital Bank is 55% owned by Telenor Group and 45% by Ant Group, so Telenor has control. The bank was excluded from the sale of Telenor Pakistan to the PTCL group, completed at the end of 2025, and in 2026 Telenor hired Citigroup to explore a sale of its stake. The controlling shareholding has therefore been under review since 2026. Any distribution or acquiring contract signed with Easypaisa in 2026 should include a change-of-control clause and merchant data portability, the only terms that survive a change of majority shareholder. The timing of this risk is set by a transaction that is already under way.

Accepting payments in Pakistan: channels, costs, and breaking points

Payment acceptance covers all the channels through which a merchant gets paid by its customers. In Pakistan, online commerce is overwhelmingly paid account to account. In the October–December 2025 quarter, the SBP recorded 305 million online purchases worth PKR 422 billion (SBP, Q2 FY26). 95% were paid directly from a bank account or wallet, and only 5% by card. A payment setup limited to card integration and the 3-D Secure flow therefore covers one transaction in 20. The other 19 require a connection to account-to-account transfers, via Raast or the wallets.

ChannelCost to the merchantCoverageWhat breaks
Raast P2M (QR code or link)Free for the customer; the institution receives a public subsidy of 0.5%, capped at PKR 100, until June 30, 2026Any holder of a bank account, microfinance bank account, or wallet at a connected EMIAfter the subsidy: no acquirer revenue model exists beyond public funding
Wallets (JazzCash, Easypaisa)Fee negotiated bilaterally; agent network costs to fundThe largest user base, including the unbankedInteroperability varies by channel; dependence on a partner that is also a competitor
PayPakDomestic interchange and scheme fees16.1M cards, ≈ 28% of cards in circulationNo acceptance outside the country; almost exclusively debit cards
Visa / MastercardInternational interchange, scheme fees paid in foreign currencyThe rest of the card base, plus foreign cardholdersCurrency outflow, highest cost, FX exposure
Cash on deliveryCourier fees, cash tied up, refusal rate at the doorUniversal2% tax withheld by the courier since July 1, 2025; manual reconciliation
Domestic acceptance channels: cost, reach, and what breaks

The central bank regulates interbank transfer pricing. Circular PSD No. 02 of 2021 requires banks to offer free digital transfers up to PKR 25,000 per account or wallet per month. Above that aggregate threshold, the fee cannot exceed 0.1% or PKR 200. Transfers within the same bank and incoming transfers remain free. Banks must notify customers of every transaction and show the free amount separately from the amount charged. The cap of 0.1% or PKR 200 sets the most a provider can earn from the transfer itself, whatever the amount.

⚠️
Finance Act 2025 turns banks and couriers into tax collectors
Since July 1, 2025, online sales of goods delivered in Pakistan have been subject to a withholding tax on the gross amount. The rate is 1% when payment goes through a payment intermediary: an acquiring bank, a marketplace, or a provider that pays out the seller. It rises to 2% for cash on delivery collected by a courier. Banks and courier companies are designated as withholding agents and file on forms STR-35 and STR-36, while marketplaces file on STR-34. The difference is deliberate: cash payments are taxed at twice the rate of digital payments. A foreign PSP that pays out Pakistani sellers is on the list of payment intermediaries subject to the 1% rate. Running that flow therefore means calculating and reporting the withholding, not just moving the funds.
  • Convertibility. The rupee is subject to exchange controls. Moving funds out of a Pakistani merchant account is a documented transaction handled through an authorized dealer. The main risk in a local project is treasury, not technology.
  • No chargebacks on Raast. Disputes are resolved through commercial refunds. Customer service procedures must be written before go-live.
  • Continuous reconciliation. Raast settles in real time, with no daily clearing file; tools built for a D+1 cycle do not work as is.
  • 1LINK certification. A foreign processor or PSP must certify separately with the national switch. This is not a variant of a scheme specification.
  • Two licensing regimes. Accepting payments requires PSO/PSP status; holding customer funds requires EMI status or a banking license. The two are distinct.

A small number of providers shape online acceptance. NIFT ePay, NIFT’s domestic gateway, runs on the TPS platform with Bank Alfalah as its settlement bank. PayFast, run by Avanza Premier Payment System, is one of the most widely used licensed gateways and supports Raast P2M. Safepay focuses on fast integration with standard e-commerce platforms. Keenu, a wallet and acceptance provider present in more than 150 cities, processes more than $1 billion in annual volume and was acquired by Bazaar Technologies in July 2025, a deal approved by the SBP. Among banks, HBL, Bank Alfalah, and MCB account for a large share of merchant acquiring.

Gulf remittances: the country’s largest external inflow

Remittances are the transfers Pakistani workers living abroad send to recipients back home. They are Pakistan’s largest external inflow and reached $41.6 billion in FY26, up 8.6% (SBP, July 2026), after a 26.6% jump the previous year to $38.3 billion. The central bank governor linked the prospect of a small current account surplus in FY26 to this inflow. The Gulf corridor supplies half of it. This dependence is a balance-of-payments issue, which explains the regulatory attention paid to the channel.

$41.6B
workers’ remittances received in FY26 (July 2025–June 2026), up 8.6%
State Bank of Pakistan, July 2026
$9.78B
from Saudi Arabia, the country’s largest corridor in FY26
SBP, FY26
$8.81B
from the United Arab Emirates, the second-largest corridor
SBP, FY26
$6.33B
from the UK; $5.23B from EU countries
SBP, FY26
A Gulf remittance to a Pakistani account, step by step
Migrant worker
Deposits cash at a branch or sends a transfer from an app
Sending is still largely physical: Gulf exchange houses, worker payroll, counters
Exchange house or sending bank
Converts the funds and forwards the order to a Pakistani correspondent
Currency conversion happens at the sending end; the exchange rate applied is the main component of the true cost to the customer
Bank or exchange company in Pakistan
Receives the funds and identifies the recipient
Since Circular EPD No. 02 of January 15, 2026, licensed exchange companies can use Raast for this last step
Raast
Credits the recipient’s account directly
Bank account, microfinance bank account, or e-money institution wallet, free of charge for the recipient
Recipient
Receives the funds in an account, or withdraws them at an agent’s counter
Cash withdrawal remains dominant, which shifts the margin to the agent network rather than the rail

The SBP tightened the rules for exchange companies from 2023 onward to move remittances from informal to formal channels. Starting in September 2023, it raised the minimum capital of exchange companies from PKR 200 million to PKR 500 million, due by December 31, 2023. It abolished Category B and franchises in favor of a single category. Banks active in that market had to set up their own exchange subsidiaries. The threshold was then doubled to PKR 1 billion in December 2024, alongside a crackdown on currency smuggling and hawala-hundi networks. The 26.6% increase recorded in FY25 therefore partly reflects this shift of flows to formal channels, not just migration trends.

⚠️
Free transfers are no longer funded by the state
The Telegraphic Transfer Charges Incentive Scheme (TTCIS), which reimbursed banks for transfer fees waived on eligible remittances, was scrapped on July 1, 2026, amid IMF program conditionality. Banks must still offer the service free to customers, with no compensation. The Pakistan Remittance Initiative remains in place, and the SBP governor has announced a new incentive program. The price shown to the sender has not changed. The cost of the service, previously reimbursed by the state, now sits on banks’ balance sheets. As a result, the economics of the Pakistan corridor are being renegotiated.

The Roshan Digital Account (RDA) is an account opened remotely, without traveling to Pakistan. This second program captures diaspora savings rather than everyday transfers. It had drawn $13.365 billion in gross inflows by the end of June 2026, of which $2.09 billion was repatriated and $8.44 billion used locally, across 917,400 accounts opened by the end of March 2026 (SBP). April 2026 set a monthly record at $321 million. The account was opened to foreign nationals and companies in March 2026. On the international front, the SBP and the Arab Monetary Fund signed a memorandum of understanding in Abu Dhabi in November 2023 to link Raast with Buna, the Arab region’s cross-border payment system.

SBP licenses: four doors, one regulator

The legal foundation is the Payment Systems and Electronic Fund Transfers Act, 2007, supplemented by the Rules for Payment System Operators and Payment Service Providers and the SBP’s sector regulations. The central bank’s Payment Systems Department reviews applications, grants authorizations, and supervises licensed firms. The process is sequential: approval in principle, then pilot operations for a period set in the approval letter, then authorization for commercial operations once that phase has been assessed. No step can be skipped. “Licensed” can therefore mean different things, since an institution still in its pilot phase cannot serve the public at scale.

RegimeRegulatory basisMinimum capitalWhat it allows
PSO / PSPPS&EFT Act 2007 + Rules for PSO/PSPPKR 200 million, plus 25% for each additional line of businessOperating a payment system, gateway, or switch; cannot hold customer funds
EMIRegulations for Electronic Money Institutions (2019, revised June 2023)PKR 200 million at launch, then a sliding scale tied to the e-money floatIssuing e-money; operating wallets, cards, and connected devices
Microfinance bankBanking framework, SBP prudential supervisionBanking requirementsThe regime for JazzCash and Easypaisa: deposits, lending, branchless banking agent network
Digital Retail BankLicensing and Regulatory Framework for Digital Banks (2022)Banking requirements, phased inFully digital retail bank; first license granted to Easypaisa Bank in January 2025
Exchange companySBP foreign exchange regimePKR 1 billion since December 2024 (PKR 500 million since the end of 2023)Currency exchange, money remittance; since January 2026, direct crediting of remittances via Raast
Pakistan’s authorization regimes and what they allow

The capital requirement for e-money institutions scales with the e-money outstanding. Starting capital of PKR 200 million allows issuance up to PKR 4 billion in float. Between PKR 4 billion and PKR 10 billion of float, the requirement becomes PKR 200 million plus 5% of the amount above PKR 4 billion. Between PKR 10 billion and PKR 20 billion, it rises to PKR 500 million plus 7.5% of the amount above PKR 10 billion. Above PKR 20 billion, it reaches PKR 1.25 billion plus 10% of the excess. Capital therefore tracks the float, not revenue. Fast growth in the wallet base automatically triggers a capital call.

ℹ️
The EMI regime is a filter, not an open door
The State Bank of Pakistan’s register lists only six e-money institutions in commercial operation, and shows four authorizations revoked or withdrawn. NayaPay received the first commercial operation authorization on August 30, 2021, and SadaPay on April 18, 2022. For each institution, this official register shows its exact phase (approval in principle, pilot, or commercial operation), which cannot be inferred from a counterparty’s sales pitch. The load limit of an EMI wallet is also regulated: PKR 25,000 a month with CNIC verification (the national identity card), and PKR 50,000 with biometric verification of the customer by one of the institution’s agents.

The digital bank regime opened in stages over three years. In January 2023, the SBP issued no-objection letters to five applicants: HugoBank, KT Bank Pakistan, Mashreq Bank Pakistan, Raqami Islamic Digital Bank, and Easypaisa. Approvals in principle followed in September 2023, and Easypaisa Bank Limited received the first Digital Retail Bank license in January 2025. Mashreq Bank Pakistan obtained the first restricted license for pilot operations. Raqami Islamic Digital Bank was declared a scheduled bank on February 6, 2026. Three years therefore separate the five no-objection letters from three banks going live, which gives a sense of how long licensing takes in Pakistan.

  • Check each counterparty’s license phase in the SBP’s official register, not in its marketing.
  • Identify the setup’s settlement bank: a PSO/PSP does not hold customer funds, so you need to know where the money sits.
  • Map currency flows from the design stage: moving funds out of a Pakistani account falls under the exchange control regime, not the commercial contract.
  • Include the tax withholding function (1% / 2%) in the project scope if the flow involves online commerce.
  • Include a change-of-control clause in wallet partnerships, given the ownership deals under way.

Financial inclusion: what the volumes don’t show

Financial inclusion, measured here as account ownership, is the share of adults with an account at a financial institution. In Pakistan, it is growing more slowly than the number of transactions on the payment rails. The country is one of eight economies that together account for most of the world’s unbanked adults (Global Findex 2025, World Bank). The barriers are practical before they are cultural: distance to a branch, hard-to-gather documents, fees, and no income to deposit. A collection strategy that assumes everyone has a bank account runs into this reality in rural areas, where most of the population lives.

58,1
Pakistan Financial Inclusion Index in 2024, up from 54.8 in 2023 (access 72.3, usage 62.5, quality 43.9)
State Bank of Pakistan, P-FII, 2024
30 pts
gender gap in account ownership in Pakistan
Global Findex 2025, World Bank
39 % → 34 %
reduction in the gender gap measured by the SBP between 2021 and 2024 under the Banking on Equality policy
State Bank of Pakistan, 2024
≈ 271 000
active branchless banking agents, out of more than 700,000 registered locations
SBP, Branchless Banking Statistics, April–June 2025

The weakest P-FII sub-index is quality, at 43.9, against 72.3 for access. The gap between the two shows that opening accounts has worked better than getting people to use them. An account opened over USSD, credited with a social transfer, and then emptied at the first withdrawal counts toward access without leading to ongoing use. Improving the quality sub-index requires services that make the account useful between payments, and those come from financial institutions rather than from the public settlement infrastructure.

  • Identity is the foundation: account opening depends on the CNIC issued by NADRA (the national registration authority), and biometric verification doubles an EMI wallet’s monthly limit.
  • Domestic credit is still in its infancy: the card base is almost entirely debit, and the first PayPak credit card was announced only in June 2026.
  • Physical acceptance tops out at about 248,000 terminals, against 2.5 million merchants accepting QR codes: two infrastructures on entirely different scales.
  • Network coverage shapes everything: the very existence of the Asaan Mobile Account USSD channel shows that a significant share of the population still has no connected smartphone.
  • Value stays in cash: 92% of transactions are digital, but only about 40% of the value exchanged.
🔑
Key takeaways for operating in Pakistan
The benchmark rail is Raast: public, free, irrevocable, and without interchange. The domestic card PayPak delivers lower costs and monetary sovereignty, but its acceptance stops at the country’s borders. The two telecom wallets are banks, with the prudential rules and decision timelines that come with that. Online commerce is paid account to account in 95% of cases. Transfer and QR pricing is set or subsidized by the central bank, and the P2M subsidy has a known end date of June 30, 2026. The country’s largest inflow remains migrant remittances from the Gulf, whose economics were reopened when the TTCIS was scrapped on July 1, 2026. A Pakistani payment acceptance project must therefore start from the public rail and from exchange controls. A card model imported from another market accounts for neither.