Reference💳 Payment methodsBeginner⏱ 14 min read

💳 Payment cards

Debit, credit, CB co-badging, technical anatomy, and limits: a close look at France's favorite payment method

The card's place in French payments

A cashless payment is any transfer of funds recorded as an entry on an account. In France, the card is by far the leading cashless payment method by volume. It overtook the check in the early 2000s, then captured most of the growth in everyday payments, driven first by contactless and then by mobile payments. Its share by value remains marginal. Credit transfers account for more than 90% of the amounts exchanged, because they carry salaries, B2B flows, and high-value payments.

≈ 62 %
card share of cashless payments (volume)
Banque de France, payment methods map, 2024 data
≈ 16B
CB transactions a year in France
GIE Cartes Bancaires, 2024
75M+
CB cards in circulation
GIE CB
≈ 30 €
average card payment amount, in steady decline
Banque de France
Payment methodShare by volumeShare by valueTrend
Card≈ 62 %≈ 2 %Growing, driven by contactless and mobile
SEPA direct debit≈ 16 %≈ 4 %Stable (subscriptions, bills)
Credit transfer (including instant)≈ 15 %> 90 %Instant payments accelerating sharply since 2025
Check≈ 2,5 %≈ 2 %Declining fast (−10% to −15% a year), high fraud per item
E-money and other≈ 4 %< 1 %Niche
Breakdown of cashless payments in France (orders of magnitude, 2024 data)

The average ticket is the total amount paid by card divided by the number of transactions. It has fallen steadily, from about €50 in the early 2010s to about €30 today, because cards are replacing cash for small amounts, down to the bakery. Raising the contactless limit to €50 in May 2020 sped up the shift by bringing below the contactless threshold payments that had until then required a PIN.

🔑
Key takeaways
Cards lead by volume, which counts transactions, and credit transfers lead by value, which adds up amounts. The same instrument therefore ranks very differently depending on the measure, and any analysis must state which one it uses. Mixing up the two remains the most common mistake in market studies.

Card types: debit, credit, deferred debit, prepaid, commercial

The French term “carte bancaire” covers several products with very different debiting mechanics, costs, and regulatory regimes. Since the EU IFR 2015/751 regulation, schemes must identify each card as debit, credit, or commercial. That category directly determines the applicable interchange, the fee the acquirer pays the issuer on each transaction.

TypeAccount debitInterchange (IFR)Typical useWatch points
Immediate debitImmediately, transaction by transactionCapped at 0.2%Everyday card, the majority in FranceBalance check possible (systematic authorization)
Deferred debitIn one sum, at month-endTreated as credit by the schemes: 0.3%Executives, big spenders, cash flow smoothingHigher annual fee; classified as “credit” internationally, which surprises cardholders abroad
Credit (revolving)Backed by a revolving credit line0,3 %Retailer store cards (big-box chains), rare in French retail bankingConsumer credit rules: APR, pre-contract disclosures
PrepaidDebits a prefunded e-money account0.2% (debit)Teens, tight budgets, gifts, unbanked peopleStrict AML/CFT limits; simplified KYC under €150 (non-reloadable)
Commercial / businessBusiness account, immediate or deferred debitNot capped by the IFRBusiness expenses, business travel, procurement (P-cards)Interchange of 1.5% to 2% internationally: a much higher acceptance cost for the merchant
The five card families
⚠️
The commercial card trap
Business cards fall outside the IFR interchange caps. Interchange++ pricing passes the actual interchange of each transaction through to the merchant, plus scheme fees and the acquirer's margin. The cost of accepting a commercial card is therefore fully visible, and it is high. Blended pricing, by contrast, applies a single rate whatever card is presented, with the PSP absorbing the difference and pricing it in. Merchants also keep the right to surcharge commercial cards: PSD2 (Art. 62(4)) bans surcharging only on consumer cards whose interchange is capped by the IFR.
  • In France, “credit card” is often misused to mean a deferred debit card. True revolving credit on a card remains a minority product, unlike in the US or the UK.
  • Cards with systematic authorization, which check the balance on every transaction, are used for entry-level offers and financially vulnerable customers: no overdraft is possible, but they are declined at tolls and parking lots that have historically worked offline.
  • Virtual cards (single-use or time-limited numbers generated on demand) are booming both for businesses (supplier payments, online travel agencies) and for consumers (e-commerce).

CB-Visa and CB-Mastercard co-badging

Co-badging means carrying two payment brands on the same instrument. Almost all cards issued by the major French banks are co-badged, which remains a French specialty. The same chip carries CB, the domestic scheme run by the GIE Cartes Bancaires banking consortium, and Visa or Mastercard, used for international transactions and for e-commerce outside the CB network.

In mainland France, a transaction at a CB-affiliated merchant is routed over the CB network by default. Visa or Mastercard take over only outside France, on foreign merchant websites, or at the few merchants not affiliated with CB. Article 8 of the IFR guarantees freedom of brand choice. The merchant can set a priority, but the cardholder must be able to override it at the terminal, with a dedicated key or an on-screen choice.

Co-badged cardone chip, two applicationsCB · A0000000421010Visa · A0000000031010Mastercard · A0000000041010AIDs on the chipApplication selectionPPSE: candidate list, priority orderCB routingdomestic networkVisa/Mastercard routinginternational networkmerchant prioritycardholder’s choiceinterchange capped (IFR)domestic scheme feessame interchangeinternational scheme feestypical extra cost: +0.05 to +0.15 pp of MSCThe cardholder has the final say (IFR art. 8, since June 9, 2016); the merchant only sets which brand is shown first.
CompanyIncentiveLever
Merchant / acquirerRoute to the cheapest network (CB domestically: competitive interchange and scheme fees)Brand priority set in the terminal (default application)
CardholderNo difference in practice (same account debited, same protections)Can force Visa/MC at the POS terminal, a right guaranteed by IFR Art. 8
International schemesWin French domestic volume, currently mostly CBIssuer incentives, single-brand offerings (neobanks: Visa or MC only)
Who chooses the brand, and why it matters
🔑
Why CB matters to merchants
Routing domestic payments over CB brings acceptance costs down, because CB's scheme fees are lower than those of the international networks. Neobanks such as Revolut and N26 issue single-brand Visa/MC cards, which cannot be routed over CB. As their share of cards in circulation grows, the volume processed by CB shrinks accordingly. That shift makes acceptance more expensive for French merchants and raises a sovereignty issue that the Banque de France (France's central bank) and the OSMP, the French payment security observatory, regularly point out.

Technically, co-badging takes the form of two separate EMV applications on the chip (the CB AID A0000000421010, and the Visa or Mastercard AID), each with its own keys and parameters. The terminal builds the list of AIDs it shares with the card, called the candidate list in EMV application selection, and then applies the priority rules.

Anatomy: PAN, BIN, CVV, magnetic stripe, chip

Every physical and logical element of a card plays a specific role in the payment chain, and each carries its own risk profile. The PAN identifies the account, the CVV2 serves as evidence of possession of the physical card in card-not-present sales, and the chip generates a cryptogram unique to each transaction. PCI DSS rules, fraud patterns, and tokenization are all defined in relation to these elements, each referring to the element it protects or replaces.

FrontScheme brand · logoEMV chip · contact + NFC antennaPAN · 4970 10•• •••• 9015Expiration date MM/YYCardholder nameBackMagnetic stripe (ISO 7813)CVV2/CVC2 · 3 printed digitsSignature panel · printed noticesIssuer contact detailsBIN/IIN: 8 digitsissuer, country, product: routingLuhn check digitchecks the format, not the accountNEVER storefull track · CVV2 · PIN blockDynamic cryptogramARQC: unique to each paymentCan be displayedBIN + last 4 digitsStatic, so cloneablethe magstripe fades from the fleet, EMV staysCVV2, full track data, and the PIN block are never stored after authorization, even encrypted.
Breaking down a PAN (card number)
  4970 1034 5678 9015          <- PAN (Primary Account Number), 16 digits here
  |______|                        (13 to 19 digits depending on the scheme, ISO/IEC 7812)
     |
  49701034  <- IIN / BIN: identifies the issuer and the product
              (8 digits since April 2022, historically 6)

  First digit(s) = MII, identifies the scheme:
    4xxxxx          -> Visa
    51-55 / 2221-2720 -> Mastercard
    34 / 37         -> American Express (15 digits)
    6xxxxx          -> Discover, UnionPay...

  5678901  <- individual account identifier assigned by the issuer
        5  <- Luhn check digit (weighted sum mod 10)
              catches typing errors, NOT fraud
Annotated contents of magnetic stripe track 2 (ISO 7813)
;4970103456789015=29072011234567890?
 |________________|
        PAN         2907  <- expiry date in YYMM format (July 2029)
                        201 <- service code:
                              2xx = international use + EMV chip present
                                    (the terminal must read the chip)
                              x0x = normal authorization, no issuer restriction
                              xx1 = no usage restriction
                                    (PIN required at ATMs only)
                    ...     <- discretionary data, including the CVV1
                               (not the same as the CVV2 printed on the back!)

Track cloning (skimming) has become useless in EMV markets:
service code 2xx forces a chip read, and the stripe alone
is declined (the "chip liability shift" rule).
ItemLocationRoleAssociated risk
PANEmbossed/printed + chip + stripeCard account identifier, routing keyMost sensitive PCI data; tokenize it everywhere
BIN / IIN (8 digits)Start of the PANIdentifies the issuer, country, and card type; basis for routing and risk scoringBIN attacks (generating Luhn-valid PANs)
Expiration dateFront + chip + stripeValidity check; weak second factor in card-not-present salesGuessable (48 combinations over 4 years)
CVV2 / CVC2Printed on the back (never on the chip or stripe)Proof of possession of the physical card in card-not-present salesStorage strictly prohibited (PCI DSS, Requirement 3.3.1)
EMV chipContact + NFC antennaDynamic cryptograms (ARQC), offline authentication (DDA/CDA)Nearly impossible to break; fraud has moved to card-not-present
Magnetic stripeStripe on the backLegacy; fallback being phased out (removed from Mastercard cards between 2024 and 2033)Can be cloned; effectively disabled in EMV markets
Card components and what they do
⚠️
PCI DSS: what must NEVER be stored
The CVV2, full track data, and the PIN block must never be stored after authorization, not even encrypted, not even “temporarily.” When the PAN is retained, it must be rendered unreadable through truncation, hashing, or strong encryption. Display is limited to the BIN and the last 4 digits, a rule historically stated as “first 6 and last 4” and adapted in PCI DSS v4 to 8-digit BINs. Nearly all major card data breaches stem from violations of these rules.

Limits, authorizations, and declines

A card limit is the maximum amount the cardholder can spend over a given period. Every card has separate payment and withdrawal limits, calculated over a rolling period, often 30 days for payments and 7 days for withdrawals. The card tier sets these amounts. Issuers increasingly adjust them in real time through the cardholder's banking app.

TierPayments / 30 daysWithdrawals / 7 daysAnnual fee
Entry-level (systematic authorization)1 000 – 2 000 €300 – 500 €0 – 25 €
Standard (Visa Classic, MC Standard, CB)2 000 – 5 000 €500 – 1 000 €40 – 60 €
Premium (Gold, Platinum)5 000 – 15 000 €1 000 – 2 500 €125 – 200 €
High-end (Infinite, World Elite)€20,000 and up, often customized€2,500 and up300 – 350 €
Typical limits by card tier (French issuers, orders of magnitude)
  • Contactless card payments: a €50 maximum per transaction since May 2020, with SCA soft limits (typically €150 cumulative or 5 consecutive transactions) that trigger a PIN request, as required by PSD2 (RTS Art. 11).
  • Mobile payments (Apple Pay, Google Pay) are not subject to the €50 limit: biometric unlocking (CDCVM) counts as strong authentication.
  • Exceeding a limit results in an issuer decline with response code 51 (“insufficient funds / limit exceeded”); the merchant sees only the decline, never the detailed reason on the customer's side.
  • Limits are an issuer risk management tool, not a guarantee for the merchant: an approved authorization can still end in a dispute and a chargeback.
ℹ️
Authorization ≠ debit
An authorization holds the amount against the cardholder's limit and, where applicable, their available balance. The actual debit happens only at clearing, usually on D+1. Hotel and fuel “pre-authorizations” rely on this mechanism, temporarily freezing an estimated amount without debiting it. The cardholder then sees their available balance drop with no entry on their statement, a gap that is a recurring source of customer confusion.

The card in the four-corner model

The four-corner model describes how a card transaction is organized among four separate parties: the cardholder, the merchant, the issuing bank, and the acquiring bank. The scheme (CB, Visa, or Mastercard) coordinates the four. It sets the rules, runs the authorization network, and organizes clearing and settlement between the two banks.

Cardholderthe customer and their cardMerchantthe merchantIssuing bankissues the cardholder's cardAcquiring bankcollects on behalf of the merchantSchemeCB · Visa · Mastercard1 · Payment (card, wallet…)2 · Authorization request34567 · Approved (00)Account debitClearing & settlement (D+1) · interchangeAuthorization (~1 s)ResponseMoney flows (D+1)
Authorizing a card payment (2 to 3 seconds)
Cardholder
Presents the card at the terminal or enters card details online
Chip, contactless, or PAN + CVV2 for card-not-present
Terminal / PSP
Builds the authorization request
Amount, PAN or token, EMV cryptogram, terminal data
Acquirer
Routes the request to the scheme
Network choice: CB domestically, Visa/MC otherwise
Scheme
Routes it to the issuing bank
Real-time authorization network (e-RSB for CB)
Issuer
Checks balance, limits, fraud score, and cryptogram
Response: code 00 (approved), 05 (declined), 51 (limit)…
Scheme → Acquirer → Terminal
Returns the response to the point of sale
Receipt printed; the amount is held, not yet debited

That night, the day's transactions go through end-of-day batch upload: the terminal sends them to the acquirer, and they are then cleared. The issuer settles with the acquirer for the amount minus interchange. The acquirer credits the merchant for the amount minus the merchant service charge (MSC), which bundles interchange, scheme fees, and the acquirer's margin. The cardholder's account is debited according to the card type, immediate or deferred.

🔑
Key takeaways
Three properties underpin the card's position. Real-time authorization tells the merchant immediately, before handing over the goods, whether the payment is approved. The payment guarantee provided by scheme rules ensures the merchant is paid even if the cardholder defaults, as long as the merchant has followed those acceptance rules. Global interoperability lets a card be used outside its country of issue. Cost is the price of the whole package. The stack of interchange, scheme fees, and acquirer margin is exactly what account-to-account payments, covered in the Wero guide, aim to bypass.

Elsewhere in the world. The same mechanism, elsewhere.

The contactless payment limit and the threshold that triggers PIN entry

The FCA set the contactless thresholds for the strong customer authentication exemption at £100 per transaction and £300 cumulative before a PIN is requested, by amending Article 11 of the SCA-RTS (Policy Statement PS21/2, published March 3, 2021). The single-transaction limit is therefore not €50 but roughly double, and the cumulative counter is more than twice as high as in France.

FCA, PS21/2 “Amendments to single and cumulative transaction thresholds for contactless payments,” https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/policy-statements/ps21-2-amendments-single-and-cumulative-transaction-thresholds-contactless-payments

India

The Reserve Bank of India raised the contactless limit from ₹2,000 to ₹5,000 per transaction effective January 1, 2021 (circular RBI/2020-21/71, DPSS.CO.PD No.752/02.14.003/2020-21). Above that amount, the additional factor of authentication (AFA) is required again.

Reserve Bank of India, circular RBI/2020-21/71 of December 4, 2020, https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=11999

Canada

No regulator sets the limit: the domestic Interac scheme allows up to C$250 per Interac Flash transaction. The cumulative limit is set by each bank or credit union, and it resets as soon as the cardholder completes a chip-and-PIN transaction.

Interac Corp., Interac Debit FAQ, https://www.interac.ca/en/resources/personal-resources/personal-faq/interac-debit/

The regulatory cap on the interchange the acquirer pays the issuer

Regulation II caps debit only, never credit: a fixed 21 cents plus 5 basis points of the transaction value (12 CFR 235.3), plus a fraud-prevention adjustment of up to 1 cent (12 CFR 235.4). The cap applies only to issuers that, together with their affiliates, have $10 billion or more in assets; below that, interchange is unregulated.

12 CFR § 235.3 and § 235.4, https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/12/235.3; Federal Reserve Board, list of exempt issuers, https://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/regii-interchange-fee-standards.htm

Brazil

Banco Central do Brasil Circular No. 3.887 of March 26, 2018 caps interchange on domestic debit card arrangements at 0.5% as a quarterly weighted average and 0.8% on any single transaction, effective October 1, 2018. Like the EU IFR, it expressly excludes corporate cards; unlike the IFR, it also excludes card-not-present transactions.

Banco Central do Brasil, Circular No. 3.887 of March 26, 2018, Art. 2, https://normativos.bcb.gov.br/Lists/Normativos/Attachments/50556/Circ_3887_v2_P.pdf

The UK kept the IFR caps in domestic law for domestic transactions, but as soon as it left the EU, the schemes raised interchange on card-not-present payments between the UK and the EEA to 1.15% for consumer debit and 1.5% for consumer credit, up from 0.2% and 0.3%. The Payment Systems Regulator puts the extra cost to UK merchants at £150 million to £200 million a year and has moved to cap these fees.

Payment Systems Regulator, “Market review into cross-border interchange fees” (MR22/2), https://www.psr.org.uk/our-work/market-reviews/market-review-into-cross-border-interchange-fees/

Who chooses the network when a card carries several brands

Regulation II requires the issuer to enable at least two unaffiliated networks on every debit card and bars it from dictating routing: the merchant chooses, through its acquirer. Since July 1, 2023, the requirement has also applied to card-not-present transactions, and therefore to e-commerce.

Federal Reserve Board, press release of October 3, 2022 (final rule, 12 CFR 235.7), https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20221003a.htm

India

Circular RBI/2023-24/131 of March 6, 2024 reverses the logic for credit cards: the cardholder, not the merchant, must be offered a choice of network, both at issuance and at each renewal. Exclusivity agreements between issuers and networks are banned. Issuers with 10 lakh (1 million) active cards or fewer are exempt, and the rule has applied since September 6, 2024.

Reserve Bank of India, “Arrangements with Card Networks for issue of Credit Cards,” RBI/2023-24/131, https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=12619

Australia

About 46 million Australian debit cards (92% of cards on issue) carry two networks: eftpos and an international scheme. Merchant Choice Routing (also called least-cost routing) lets the merchant send transactions to the cheaper network, but in a strict order of priority: an explicit choice by the cardholder, including through a wallet, always overrides the merchant's preference, which in turn overrides the card's default network.

Australian Payments Plus (eftpos operator), “Merchant Choice Routing,” https://www.auspayplus.com.au/solutions/eftpos-for-businesses-mcr