Reference🧭 Global overviewsIntermediate⏱ 26 min read

💵 Cash and over-the-counter payment networks worldwide

Measuring cash share against the right denominator, collecting payments through OXXO, boleto, konbini, and mobile money agents, handling cash on delivery, and costing what cash really costs merchants

Measuring cash share against the right denominator

Cash share is the weight of cash in a market's payments, measured against a reference total. Central banks, statistics agencies, and payment providers all publish figures under that name, but they do not use the same denominator. The first difference is the unit counted. Transaction counts and transaction values never give the same result, because cash is used mostly for small amounts. The second difference is the channel: a measure may cover in-person points of sale, remote commerce, or bill payments. A comparison between two markets is valid only if both use the same unit and the same channel.

52 %
cash share by NUMBER of point-of-sale payments, euro area (39% by value)
ECB, SPACE 2024
14 %
cash share by number of US consumer payments, 2024 data
Federal Reserve, Diary of Consumer Payment Choice 2025
58,0 %
cashless payment ratio in Japan in 2025, or ¥162.7 trillion, on the new domestic indicator
METI, published March 31, 2026
14 %
cash share of global in-store payment VALUE in 2025, projected to fall to 12% by 2030
Worldpay, Global Payments Report 2026
MarketPublished measureValueSource and year
Euro areaCash share by number of point-of-sale payments52% in 2024, down from 59% in 2022 and 72% in 2019ECB, SPACE 2024
Euro areaCash share by value at the point of sale39% in 2024, down from 42% in 2022ECB, SPACE 2024
Malta / SloveniaCash share by number, point of sale67% and 64%ECB, SPACE 2024
Netherlands / FinlandCash share by number, point of sale22% and 27%ECB, SPACE 2024
United StatesCash share by number of consumer payments14%, behind credit (35%) and debit (30%)Federal Reserve, Diary 2025 (2024 data)
JapanCashless payment ratio (without cash), domestic indicator58.0%, or 46.3% on the international comparison indicatorMETI, March 31, 2026
BrazilBoleto share by number of retail payment transactions7.6% in the second half of 2025Banco Central do Brasil
GlobalCash share of in-store payment value14% in 2025Worldpay, Global Payments Report 2026
Same question, four different measures. Check the definition before comparing
⚠️
Japan publishes two ratios 12 points apart
On March 31, 2026, METI (Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) published a cashless payment ratio of 58.0% for 2025, based on a new domestic indicator. The same year measured on the international comparison indicator comes out at 46.3%. Both figures are correct, but they use different denominators, and the 12-point gap comes entirely from that difference in definition. A Japanese market study that swaps one figure for the other therefore describes a level of cashless adoption that neither measure supports. A figure like this means nothing without the definition behind it, in Japan or anywhere else.

Cash share of payments and the value of banknotes in circulation are two different quantities, and they can move in opposite directions. India's currency in circulation reached ₹41.68 trillion at the end of fiscal 2025–2026, up 11.9% year over year (Reserve Bank of India). That was the largest increase in absolute terms since the year after demonetization. Over the same period, UPI kept breaking volume records, so both series grew together.

Brazil is moving the other way. Cash withdrawals fell to 1.1 billion transactions in the second half of 2025, down 13.8% year over year (Banco Central do Brasil). Pix captured 54.7% of retail payment transactions over the same period. The drop in withdrawals has tracked the rollout of a free public payment rail to the entire adult population, something no other market has replicated so far.

OXXO, Rapipago, Abitab: Latin America's payment counters

A cash collection network is a set of physical retail locations that collect payment, on a merchant's behalf, for an order placed elsewhere. The model is used from Mexico to Uruguay under several names: cash voucher, pago en efectivo, or CIP code. The customer orders online, receives a numeric reference, then goes to a counter to pay in cash. The collection network takes the funds on the merchant's behalf and passes them on at its settlement cycle. Payment therefore becomes asynchronous, with hours or days between the order and the confirmation.

How an OXXO Pay payment flows
Merchant
Creates a cash payment order
The gateway (Conekta, dLocal, Kushki, and others) generates a numeric reference and an expiration date
Customer
Gets the reference on screen, by email, or in the app
No printout needed: the customer reads the reference out to the cashier
OXXO counter
Collects the exact amount in cash
Partial payments are not possible; the amount must match the reference down to the centavo
Collection network
Notifies the gateway
The confirmation flows back to the merchant, which then releases the order
Merchant
Receives the funds on the gateway's settlement cycle
The lag between cash collection at the counter and the credit to the account is contractual, not technical
NetworkOperatorCountrySinceWhat to know
OXXO Pay and PaynetFEMSA (OXXO Pay); Paynet (multi-retailer network)Mexico2015The must-have rail for Mexican e-commerce. Selling in Mexico without it cuts off a significant share of the market.
Rapipago and Pago FácilGrupo Gire (Rapipago); Prisma / Multipago (Pago Fácil)Argentina1990Bill payment and cash voucher outlets, still essential for the unbanked population.
AbitabAbitab S.A.Uruguay1993About 240 locations in Montevideo and 240 more in over 100 towns (Abitab, 2026). Grew out of a network of lottery agents.
RedpagosRedpagosUruguay2001The second national network, formed from a merger of currency exchange houses. The Abitab / Redpagos duopoly shapes all cash acceptance in the country.
PagoEfectivoOrbis Ventures S.A.C. (Paysafe group)Peru–Generates a CIP code payable at a bank branch or a bodega. Also available in Argentina and Ecuador.
PayNearMePayNearMe, Inc.United States2009The North American equivalent: paying an online bill in cash at a partner retailer.
Latin America's major cash collection networks

Pricing on these networks combines a percentage and a fixed fee per reference, with a minimum fee and amount limits. Conekta publishes an e-commerce rate for cash payments of 2.6% + MXN 3.00 before tax, with a minimum fee of MXN 5.40. Financial services and insurance pay a flat MXN 16 before tax. The maximum per reference is MXN 35,000 and the minimum MXN 10, across a network of more than 19,000 payment locations (Conekta, published pricing, accessed in 2026). Customers sometimes pay a fee of their own, from MXN 10 to MXN 13 depending on the location.

⚠️
Three failure points this rail has and cards never do
Expiration. Each reference has an expiration date. After that date, a customer who shows up at the counter is turned away, and the order stays open, unpaid, on the merchant's side. No partial payments. The amount collected must match the reference exactly, so any discount or adjustment made after the reference is created requires a new one. The cap. An amount above the per-reference maximum has to be split across several references, and some of them never get paid. Conversion tracking must therefore distinguish “reference created” from “reference paid,” or the measured rate will include orders that were never paid.

These networks also act as bank tellers. Spin by OXXO, launched in 2021, links a digital wallet to the convenience store network, turning each store into a place to deposit and withdraw cash. The offering puts the retailer in direct competition with banks for unbanked customers. The e-money is issued by an electronic payment funds institution separate from FEMSA and OXXO: Compropago S.A. de C.V. The commercial contract and compliance due diligence apply to that entity.

Brazil's boleto: a negotiable instrument, not a transfer

The Boleto Bancário is a Brazilian barcoded payment slip that a creditor issues and a debtor pays at a bank counter, at an ATM, or by debit. Because it is a negotiable instrument, it supports three things the Pix instant payment system does not: protest, enforcement, and assignment. That legal difference explains why the boleto has held its ground against Pix in B2B and collections, even though consumers have largely abandoned it for purchases. The rail is operated by Nuclea, formerly CIP, under the supervision of the Banco Central do Brasil. Febraban, the Brazilian banking federation, sets the format but does not operate it.

1993
The boleto is created
A barcoded instrument payable in cash at a counter, at an ATM, or by debit. The legacy rail for the unbanked and for B2B.
2017-2018
Nova Plataforma de Cobrança
Núclea centralizes registration with Febraban and the central bank. Rollout proceeds in steps, starting with the largest amounts.
October 27, 2018
Registration required from R$0.01
An unregistered boleto can no longer be paid. The unregistered boleto disappears, and with it some of the fake-slip fraud.
November 2020
Pix launches
The central bank's instant payment rail, free for consumers, mandatory for institutions with more than 500,000 accounts.
2021
Pix Saque and Pix Troco
The Banco Central requires all participants to offer cash withdrawal and cashback at retailers, settled by Pix.
H2 2025
The boleto levels off at 7.6%
7.6% of retail payment transactions, with transaction value up 3.7% year over year (Banco Central do Brasil).
78.4B
retail payment transactions in Brazil in the second half of 2025, worth R$68.2 trillion
Banco Central do Brasil
54,7 %
Pix share by number of transactions (42.9 billion), and 28.6% by value
Banco Central do Brasil, H2 2025
7,6 %
boleto share by number of transactions; value up 3.7% year over year
Banco Central do Brasil, H2 2025
−13,8 %
year-over-year drop in cash withdrawals, to 1.1 billion transactions
Banco Central do Brasil, H2 2025

Mandatory registration changed how collection works. A registered boleto can be paid at any bank, even after the due date and even through a banking correspondent. Before 2018, a slip issued by one bank could be refused at another. The central registry also tells the issuer what was paid, where, and when. Reconciliation used to rely on bank files in inconsistent formats.

🔑
What Pix has not replaced
Three uses remain. B2B with payment terms. The boleto carries a due date, late interest, and a penalty, all written into the instrument itself. Debt collection. An unpaid boleto can be protested before a cartório (a notary's registry office), which records the debtor in a public register and hurts their credit. Paying a bill in cash. A debtor with no bank account can walk up to a counter with banknotes. A supplier that swaps the boleto entirely for Pix therefore loses the enforceable due date written into the instrument, the option to protest, and cash collection at the counter.

Pix Saque and Pix Troco let customers withdraw cash or get cashback at participating retailers in exchange for a Pix payment. The Banco Central has thus turned every participating store into a cash distribution point, with no ATM required. The merchant hands its surplus cash to the customer and receives the equivalent in its account. Volume remains modest: 8.5 million transactions in the second half of 2025, up 20.9%. Brazil treats access to cash as a service delivered by the merchant network.

Japan's konbini: 56,000 counters that never close

A konbini is a Japanese convenience store that is always open and serves as a payment counter in addition to its retail business. Customers pay electricity bills, local taxes, online orders, insurance premiums, or installments on deferred purchases there. The service is called 収納代行 (shūnō daikō), meaning collection on behalf of third parties. No Western network comes close to this density of payment locations, so cash acceptance in Japan is built around convenience store chains.

56 054
convenience stores as of December 31, 2025, across the association's 7 member chains
Japan Franchise Association, CVS statistics 2025
¥12,058.3B
annual sales across all stores in 2025, up 2.2% year over year
Japan Franchise Association, CVS statistics 2025
16.34 billion
checkout transactions in 2025, down 0.2%
Japan Franchise Association, CVS statistics 2025
737,9 ¥
average ticket for the year, up 2.5% year over year
Japan Franchise Association, CVS statistics 2025
How a konbini payment flows
Biller or merchant
Issues a barcoded slip, or a number to enter at the in-store kiosk
Paper slips still dominate for recurring bills; e-commerce uses a number shown on screen
Customer
Goes to the counter with the slip or the number
Payment is in cash; chains very often refuse cards for these transactions
Store chain
Collects the cash and hands over a stamped receipt
The receipt is proof of payment; it is requested in a dispute, and the customer must keep it
Collection agent (収納代行業者)
Aggregates payments collected across all chains
The intermediary consolidates, reconciles, and notifies the biller. The merchant signs its contract with this intermediary, not with the store chain
Biller
Receives the funds on the contractual cycle
The payout lag, not the speed of collection, determines the working capital requirement
IssueWhat appliesImpact on the merchant
Limit per slip¥300,000 including tax, a limit set by the collection agentsA larger amount cannot be collected on a single barcode; it has to be split
Who pays the feeThe biller, as a flat fee per payment collectedThe unit cost is fixed: heavy on small amounts, light on large ones
Cost trendAcross-the-board increase of several tens of yen from 2022, after the association asked for a fee review in October 2020A contract signed before 2020 is no longer at market rates; the review clause is up for negotiation
ConfirmationDelayed: the biller learns of the payment from the collection agent's fileAny logic that releases orders immediately must be triggered by the notification, not the due date
Payment method at the counterOverwhelmingly cashA customer with no cash has to withdraw it before paying; the in-store ATM is part of the flow
Operational constraints of konbini payments

Konbini also serve as payment points for Japanese consumer credit. NP後払い (Net Protections, 2002) introduced pay-by-invoice for e-commerce 15 years before Klarna: the seller is guaranteed payment, and the buyer pays on receipt, at a konbini or by bank transfer. Paidy (2014, a PayPal subsidiary since 2021) rolls a month's purchases into a single bill, which can also be paid at the counter. Japanese buy now, pay later therefore relies on the convenience store network for collection, not on a card-linked credit line.

ℹ️
Retailer prepaid: a blind spot in European overviews
nanaco (Seven Card Service, 2007) and WAON (AEON Financial Service, 2007) are closed-loop retailer e-money products that customers top up with cash at the register. WAON is accepted far beyond its own group's stores, including at FamilyMart and McDonald's. This retailer prepaid model has almost no counterpart in Europe, and it accounts for part of the apparent decline of cash in Japan. A top-up converts banknotes into an electronic balance once, at the register, instead of cash changing hands at every purchase. Purchases then paid from that balance count as cashless, even though the money originally came from banknotes.

Mobile money agent networks

A mobile money agent is an independent merchant appointed by an operator to convert cash into e-money and back. The agent network is the service's only physical point of contact, and wherever there is no agent, there is no access to cash. The business depends on holding two inventories at once: banknotes in the till and an e-money balance in the account. Every transaction draws down one and adds to the other, so agents rebalance both several times a day.

30M
registered mobile money agents worldwide in 2025, up 16% year over year
GSMA, State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money 2026
$430B
cash deposits collected by agents in 2025, up by a fifth, the fastest growth in four years
GSMA, State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money 2026
$2.3T
global mobile money transaction value in 2025, double the 2021 level
GSMA, State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money 2026
593M
30-day active accounts out of 2.3 billion registered: three in four accounts sit idle
GSMA, State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money 2026
What an agent actually does, and where it gets stuck
Customer
Deposits cash (*cash-in*)
The agent takes the cash and transfers e-money from its own balance to the customer
Agent
Watches its e-money float shrink and its cash pile grow
Two inventories moving in opposite directions; every transaction throws one of them off balance
Next customer
Withdraws cash (*cash-out*)
The reverse: the agent's e-money balance goes up and the till empties
Agent
Rebalances through a supervisor, a bank branch, or another agent
This is where the network breaks down every day: an agent out of balance turns customers away, and the system never hears about it
Operator
Pays the commission
Tiered by amount and taken out of the customer's fee; it is the agent's only income on the transaction

As the network gets denser, each agent earns less, and the figures published in Kenya document the trend. Safaricom had 333,011 M-PESA agents at the end of March 2026, up from 298,890 a year earlier and about 173,000 in 2020. Commissions paid came to KES 37.38 billion in fiscal 2026, compared with KES 37.82 billion two years earlier. A flat commission pool spread across more and more agents drives average income down to KES 112,244 a year, from 144,355 in 2024 (Business Daily Africa, based on Safaricom data).

SystemOperatorFootprintPublished figures
M-PESASafaricom plc / M-Pesa AfricaKenya, plus Tanzania, DRC, Mozambique, and Lesotho through VodacomKES 41,680 billion and 46.41 billion transactions in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026; 40 million monthly active customers; 3.1 million merchants (Safaricom, 2026)
MTN MoMoMTN Group Fintech13+ markets69.5 million active users, 23.3 billion transactions, $500.3 billion in value, 1.4 million active agents (MTN Group, 2025 results published March 16, 2026)
Orange MoneyOrange Middle East and AfricaWest Africa, Central Africa, the MaghrebRun country by country through e-money subsidiaries licensed by central banks, separate from the telecom subsidiaries
Wave Mobile MoneyWave Mobile Money Inc.Senegal, Côte d'Ivoire, Mali, Burkina Faso, UgandaMore than 20 million monthly active users and 150,000 agents in mid-2025; 1% fee on transfers, free deposits and withdrawals (company figures, unaudited)
MTN Mobile Money GhanaMobile Money Limited, licensed as an EMI by the Bank of GhanaGhanaGHS 4,100 billion in transactions and a float of GHS 38.4 billion in 2025 (MTN Ghana, March 2026)
telebirrEthio TelecomEthiopiaMore than 54.8 million registered users in July 2025 and ETB 2,380 billion over the fiscal year (Ethio Telecom, 2025)
bKash / NagadbKash Limited (BRAC Bank group); Nagad LimitedBangladeshMore than 82 million verified users at bKash (2025); Nagad operates under postal law, not a mobile financial services license
GCashG-Xchange, Inc. (Mynt)Philippines81 million active users and 2.5 million merchants in January 2025; an e-money issuer without a banking license
Easypaisa / JazzCashEasypaisa Digital Bank; Mobilink Microfinance BankPakistanAbout 18 million and 21 million monthly active users (company statements, 2025); both operate under a microfinance bank license
The major agent networks and what sets them apart
⚠️
Nigeria tightened the rules for its agent network in October 2025
Nigeria's agent count grew from 83,560 in January 2019 to 1.92 million in August 2024 (SANEF / Central Bank of Nigeria). The Guidelines for the Operations of Agent Banking in Nigeria, issued on October 6, 2025, now govern that growth. An agent may work for one principal only and belong to a single super-agent. Hard limits are ₦100,000 in deposits and withdrawals per customer per day, ₦500,000 per week, and ₦1,200,000 in total daily withdrawals per agent. Every terminal must be geofenced to the registered outlet, and complaints must be resolved within seven days. The exclusivity and location rules take effect on April 1, 2026. An operator whose distribution relies on agents shared among several principals must therefore assign each outlet to a single principal before that date.

Mobile money's success depends on conditions in the host market. Vodacom shut down M-Pesa in South Africa in June 2016, with about 76,000 active users against an initial target of 10 million. South Africans were already banked and carried payment cards. The service offered them account access that other instruments already provided, unlike the markets where it took off.

Cash on delivery

Cash on delivery (cash on delivery, or COD; contre-remboursement in France, ramburs in Romania) means paying for an order at the moment it is handed over, directly to the carrier. The merchant ships the goods before collecting anything. The courier collects the cash and turns it over to its employer, which passes it on to the merchant on a contractual schedule. The transaction therefore involves three successive transfers of risk: at shipment, at collection, and at payout. This payment method dominates e-commerce across much of North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia.

Where a cash-on-delivery chain breaks down
Merchant
Ships the goods
Shipping costs incurred, inventory out the door, nothing collected in return. The seller carries the entire credit risk
Carrier
Hands over the parcel and collects payment
First failure point: the customer refuses the parcel, is not home, or does not have the exact amount
Carrier
Pools the cash collected
Second failure point: the merchant becomes an unsecured creditor of the carrier for all cash in transit
Carrier
Pays the merchant, net of its fees
The payout lag, often weekly, drives the seller's working capital needs
Merchant
Reconciles payouts against orders
Third failure point: discrepancies between parcels delivered, cash reported, and funds received are resolved by hand

The largest cost in cash on delivery is return to origin, ahead of the carrier's fee. Indian industry estimates put cash on delivery at 60% to 65% of e-commerce orders (ET Prime Research, 2024). The return-to-origin rate reportedly reaches 25% to 30%, compared with 2% to 3% for prepaid orders. Each return means two trips, warehouse handling, and restocking, all costs incurred with no sale booked.

LeverHow it worksKey limitation
Explicit cash-on-delivery feeCharge for the payment method, not the productSeen as a penalty; set it based on the cost of returns, not the carrier's fee
Prepayment discountShift the incentive toward cards, bank transfers, or walletsAn immediate, certain cost against a delayed, probable gain
Phone number verification at checkoutWeed out bogus orders before shippingAdds friction to every order, including legitimate ones
Card or QR payment on deliveryThe courier carries a terminal or a payment codeThe customer stays in control until the doorstep; no need to make change, and returns remain possible
Pickup point collection with payment on siteA customer who makes the trip is committedSharply reduces returns to origin, but shrinks the delivery area
Risk scoring by address and order historyOffer cash on delivery only to trusted customersNeeds enough volume to be statistically sound
Reducing the share of cash on delivery without losing sales
⚠️
Your carrier is a counterparty risk, not a logistics provider
Between collection at the customer's door and payout, the merchant's money sits in the carrier's accounts. With a weekly payout cycle and daily deliveries, that exposure routinely reaches several days of sales. The merchant is an unsecured creditor of the carrier, and if the carrier fails, the merchant loses the proceeds of sales already delivered. Contracts address this risk on three points: a capped payout lag, reconciliation at the order level rather than against a single consolidated slip, and a guarantee or segregation of the cash collected. None of these clauses comes standard in a shipping contract; each has to be negotiated.

The real cost of cash for merchants

The cost of accepting cash covers everything a merchant spends to take in, store, and deposit notes and coins. Unlike cards, none of these costs comes as a per-transaction fee billed by a provider, which is why cash is often seen as free. The cost items are checkout time, end-of-day cash-up, cash-in-transit, coin supply, and cash discrepancies. The Deutsche Bundesbank and the EHI Retail Institute put a figure on the total for German retail, timing 3,125 real transactions with a stopwatch.

Cost itemAnnual totalPer transactionAs % of cash sales
Checkout time for cash payments€1,881.9M0,121 €0,896 %
Back office: counting, cash-up, equipment, insurance€1,314.8M0,084 €0,626 %
Cash pickup and change supply€578.0M0,037 €0,275 %
Total, cash€3,774.7M0,242 €1,797 %
For comparison: domestic debit card with PIN€675.3M0,33 €0,67 %
For comparison: credit card with signature€319.2M1,036 €1,817 %
Cost breakdown of a cash payment in German retail (Deutsche Bundesbank and EHI Retail Institute, “Kosten der Bargeldzahlung im Einzelhandel,” 2019)
22.3 s
average time for a cash payment, compared with 29.4 seconds for a card with PIN and 38.6 seconds with signature
Bundesbank / EHI, 2019
18 min
average time to close out a register, 17 minutes of it spent handling cash
Bundesbank / EHI, 2019
13,48 €
average ticket paid in cash, compared with €49.03 by debit card and €57.05 by credit card
Bundesbank / EHI, 2019
0,134 %
average bank fee charged on a cash deposit at the branch
Bundesbank / EHI, 2019
🔑
The ranking flips with the unit of measure, and that is what drives the decision
Per transaction, cash is the cheapest payment method in German retail, at €0.242 versus €0.33 for the domestic debit card. As a share of sales, the ranking flips: 1.797% versus 0.67%. The gap comes from ticket size, not from the payment technology: the average ticket is €13.48 in cash versus €49.03 by card. The authors controlled for this difference with a simulation. At the same €13.48 ticket, the debit card becomes cheaper than cash both per transaction and as a percentage of sales. The total cost of card payments would then double, from €1,656 million to €3,532 million. Any comparison of payment methods must therefore hold the average ticket constant; otherwise the ranking reflects ticket mix rather than the cost of acceptance.

Several costs are left out of that figure, and they weigh heavily in some store formats. Employee theft and robbery hit isolated stores with large cash holdings and long opening hours hardest. Cash discrepancies eat up management time without ever showing up as a payment cost. Cash-in-transit contracts are often billed per pickup, which penalizes frequent, small collections. Idle cash is one last cost: notes sitting in the drawer and the safe earn no interest and cannot fund inventory.

  • Measure before deciding: timing a sample of cash transactions and a register close-out gives a more reliable internal cost than any industry average.
  • Cut handling, not cash: cash recyclers at the register, smart safes with provisional credit, automated counting. The savings come in the back office, the largest cost after checkout time.
  • Renegotiate cash-in-transit at the right frequency: adding safe capacity and spacing out pickups costs less than scheduling more of them.
  • Put deposit fees where they belong: negotiate the cash deposit fee as you would a card fee, and compare it with the cost of accepting other payment methods.
  • Track the average ticket by payment method: it is the variable that determines the cost ranking, and the one an aggregate ratio always hides.

Accepting cash: legal obligations and physical access

Legal tender is the status the law gives to notes and coins, which makes them valid for discharging a debt. Whether a merchant must accept them is a separate question, and countries answer it differently. In the US, no federal rule requires a private business to take cash; the obligation comes from states and cities. In the euro area, the Court of Justice of the European Union takes the opposite view: legal tender in principle carries an obligation to accept notes and coins at face value. A company rolling out a cashless concept across several countries therefore has to check the law market by market.

MarketRuleSinceReach
NorwayBusinesses must offer cash payment up to NOK 20,000 on premises that sell to consumers, under the Financial Contracts ActOctober 1, 2024; fines possible since May 1, 2025Physical stores open to the public
DenmarkBan on accepting DKK 20,000 or more in cash in a single transaction, on anti-money laundering groundsIn forceAll businesses
Euro areaCouncil position of December 19, 2025, on the regulation on the legal tender of euro banknotes and coins, codifying the CJEU ruling (joined cases C-422/19 and C-423/19)Position adopted, text not finalMandatory acceptance at face value, with power to discharge debts; member states must guarantee access to cash
US (federal)No obligation for private businesses to accept cash–Yields to any state or municipal rule
US (states)Cash acceptance required: Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Oregon, Tennessee, Montana, New YorkVaries; New York State's Protection of Cash Payments law took effect March 20, 2026In-person sales; online, mail, and phone orders are generally exempt
US (cities)Philadelphia, San Francisco, Detroit, WashingtonIn force in Washington since January 1, 2025Retail and restaurants
Obligations to accept cash and cash payment limits: status of the rules cited

An obligation to accept cash assumes consumers can still get hold of it, which makes access to withdrawals the other half of the question. The UK monitors that access closely. The LINK network counted 42,403 ATMs, 33,710 of them free to use, and 1,272 million withdrawals in 2025. As of May 2026, 3,756 machines were designated “protected” and 282 banking hubs had been recommended. In the euro area, 57% of consumers say they can withdraw cash at a store checkout, and 87% say it is easy to get to an ATM or a bank, down from 89% in 2022 (ECB, SPACE 2024).

ℹ️
Cash withdrawals are exempt from EU interchange caps
Article 1(3) of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 explicitly excludes ATM and over-the-counter cash withdrawals from the interchange caps. Interbank fees on a withdrawal are therefore uncapped, and they are far higher than the 0.2% that applies to debit card payments. The Cirrus (Mastercard) and Plus (Visa) interoperability marks signal this acceptance at ATMs. Visa rules prohibit using the Plus logo in a way that suggests in-store acceptance.

Cash is still the only payment method that works without a telecommunications network. That property is cited for business continuity, and some markets have built it into their payment architecture. Norway's BankAxept scheme works offline and serves as a designated cash distribution channel at the grocery retailer NorgesGruppen. A continuity plan that relies only on card fallback mode therefore overlooks the one rail that stays available during a network outage.

Accepting cash: what to check before you sell

The cash collection rails covered in this guide fall into four families, each with its own mechanism and its own constraints for merchants. None substitutes for another; each one carries local collection in the markets where it dominates. Together, these four families cover most situations merchants face outside high card-penetration markets.

🧾
Cash voucher with reference
OXXO Pay, Paynet, Rapipago, Pago Fácil, Abitab, Redpagos, PagoEfectivo, PayNearMe. Asynchronous payment, flat fee, expiring reference, no partial payments. Integrate with explicit handling of unpaid references.
📄
Negotiable payment instrument
Boleto Bancário in Brazil. Mandatory registration with Nuclea, payable at any bank even after the due date, and can be protested. The only rail on this list with legal consequences of its own when it goes unpaid.
🏪
Always-open counter network
Japan's konbini and its 収納代行 collection model. ¥300,000 limit per slip, flat fee paid by the biller, delayed confirmation through the collection agent's file. The contract is with the collection agent, not the store chain.
📱
Agent network
M-PESA, MTN MoMo, Orange Money, Wave, telebirr, bKash, Nagad, GCash, Easypaisa, JazzCash, EcoCash, Multicaixa Express, Tigo Money. Service depends on the agent's local liquidity, which the system does not measure.
  • Find the dominant rail, not just an available one. A gateway that offers cards in Mexico without OXXO Pay covers only part of the market, and the gap shows up in the conversion rate.
  • Check who issues and who collects. The brand owner is almost never the regulated entity: Compropago for Spin by OXXO, Mobile Money Limited for MTN MoMo in Ghana, and a separate e-money subsidiary in each country for Orange Money.
  • Model the cash flow lag. Payment at the counter, notification from the collection agent, payout of funds: three different timestamps, and only one of them is contractually binding.
  • Track every unpaid reference. Created, expired, paid, paid late: without those four states, the measured conversion rate is wrong and the reconciliation does not balance.
  • Treat agent liquidity as a service risk. A dense network is not necessarily a liquid one, and an agent who runs out of cash turns customers away without leaving a trace in the system logs.
  • Calculate what cash costs you before refusing it. Checkout time and back-office work cost more than cash-in-transit, and the average ticket decides the final ranking.
🔑
The one rule to take away
Each of these rails puts a physical intermediary between customer and merchant: a counter clerk, a courier, or a mobile money agent. That intermediary holds the funds for a measurable period and can run short of liquidity, change, or availability. A technical API integration is therefore not enough. The holding period and the counterparty risk must be modeled, then translated into contract clauses and reconciliation rules. An OXXO payment or a cash-on-delivery order handled like a card authorization leaves both of these outside the system, and the gap surfaces at the first month-end close.