← Back to News
Regulation

SEPA, Swift ban free-text addresses in payments from November 15

From November 15, 2026, SEPA credit transfers, instant transfers, and direct debits, plus Swift CBPR+ messages, were to carry structured or hybrid addresses, a deadline since postponed. In July, 65% of messages reportedly failed the test and 44% of banks were behind.

⚠️
Update, September 23, 2026
The November 2026 deadlines described in this article have been postponed. On August 27, 2026, Swift deferred the switch to structured addresses that was due with its Standards Release on November 14, 2026. Unstructured addresses can still be used in ISO 20022 payment messages, until at least November 2027 according to J.P. Morgan, and Swift will announce a new timetable by December 2026 at the latest. On September 9, 2026, the European Payments Council’s Payment Scheme Management Board (PSMB) also dropped the November 15, 2026 end date for its five payment schemes, including SCT, SCT Inst, and SDD. It will set a new date in October 2026. Swift and the EPC both urge banks to keep migrating, and the EPC recommends moving straight to fully structured addresses. The rest of this article describes the timeline as it stood on July 15, 2026.

From November 15, 2026, payment messages in the SEPA schemes and on Swift’s cross-border CBPR+ service will no longer be allowed to carry payer and payee addresses as free text. The European Payments Council (EPC) is banning unstructured addresses from SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT), SEPA Instant Credit Transfer (SCT Inst), and SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) on the same date that Swift does so for CBPR+. Only structured or hybrid addresses will be accepted.

Instant payments, Wero, and stablecoins have taken the headlines, but for bank back offices this single address field is the most concrete deadline of fall 2026. It is the last big step of the ISO 20022 migration, and by several observers’ accounts much of the industry is not ready. With four months to go, 65% of messages are reportedly still noncompliant, and 44% of banks are behind schedule.

Free-text addresses defeat automated screening

Many payment messages still carry the parties’ addresses as blocks of free text: two lines of 70 characters, with no structure, mixing building number, street, postal code, and town. A person can read that. A machine can’t, and anti-money laundering checks, sanctions screening, and automated reconciliation all depend on machine-readable data. ISO 20022 therefore puts each component in its own tagged field.

FormatDescriptionStatus
StructuredEach element in a dedicated field: Street Name, Building Number, Post Code, Town Name, Country CodeRecommended (end target)
HybridAt minimum Town Name and Country Code structured, plus up to 2 lines of free textAccepted (transition step)
UnstructuredFree text only (2 × 70 characters)Banned from Nov. 15, 2026
The three address formats and their status on November 15, 2026
ℹ️
Town and country are the minimum
The EPC settled on a pragmatic compromise. A sender that is not ready to structure the whole address must at least put the town and the country code in their dedicated fields. Those are the two data points that matter most for regulatory screening.
Old postcards bearing handwritten addresses
On an envelope, the address is written as a single block. In a payment message, each element will have its own field from November 15, 2026.

SEPA lines up with Swift’s annual release

The date was chosen on purpose. It matches Swift’s annual Standards Release in November 2026, a year after CBPR+ ended the coexistence period between the legacy MT format and ISO 20022 for cross-border payments. The European Payments Council aligned the SEPA schemes concerned, credit transfers (SCT), instant credit transfers (SCT Inst), and direct debits (SDD), on the same switch so that banks don’t have to run two competing timetables. The move caps a migration that began in 2023: after converting the messages, the industry now has to fix the quality of the data they carry.

March 2023
ISO 20022 coexistence begins
The cross-border payments migration starts, with MT and ISO 20022 running side by side.
Oct. 2025
EPC publishes its guidance
The EPC sets out the address rules (document EPC153-22), opens the hybrid format, and moves the end of free text from November 22 to November 15, 2026, to align with Swift.
Nov. 2025
MT coexistence ends
ISO 20022 becomes the only standard for Swift cross-border payments, replacing MT messages.
Nov. 15, 2026
Free text ends
Unstructured addresses are banned from SCT, SCT Inst, SDD, and Swift CBPR+, in step with the Swift Standards Release. The hybrid format remains the safety net.

Readiness still lags

Nov. 15, 2026
End of free-text addresses
European Payments Council
65%
of messages still noncompliant worldwide
ClearingPost
44%
of banks behind on their compliance plans
ClearingPost
3
SEPA schemes affected: SCT, SCT Inst, SDD
EPC
⚠️
Noncompliant payments risk rejection
After November 15, a message that still carries a purely unstructured address may be rejected by the receiving bank or the clearing infrastructure. Instant credit transfers are processed automatically in under 10 seconds with no human involvement, so there is no room for a manual fix.

Banks, corporates, vendors, and merchants all have work to do

  • Banks and PSPs: adapt payment engines, counterparty databases, and sanctions screening engines to send and accept structured addresses, and handle incoming pacs.008 messages in both formats.
  • Corporates and large billers: clean up and enrich the address data in their customer and supplier databases, which has often been stored as free text for years.
  • Software vendors and integrators: update connectors, payment initiation files (pain.001), and APIs so that the structured fields reach all the way to the payer.
  • Merchants and marketplaces: check that their payment providers pass on compliant data, or risk seeing settlements blocked in the middle of peak season.

Five steps to take before November

  • Map the flows that still carry unstructured addresses, both outgoing and incoming.
  • Move to the hybrid format first, with town and country structured. It is the safety net that avoids rejections without a full rebuild.
  • Start a data quality project to gradually parse existing records into the fully structured format.
  • Test acceptance of incoming messages in both formats under real conditions, without waiting for the Standards Release.
  • Avoid a “big bang.” The EPC built in a grace period precisely so that firms can migrate in stages.

Structured addresses look like a dry subject, but they are the invisible foundation of payments’ higher-profile projects. Without clean, machine-readable data, fraud prevention, sanctions screening, and automated reconciliation of instant transfers can’t deliver what they promise. November 15, 2026, won’t make the front page, but it will decide how smoothly millions of payments a day flow. For payments teams that haven’t started, this summer is the time.

Provenance

Published July 15, 2026

7 sources, 6 distinct domains

↗ ClearingPost · The November 2026 Structured Address Deadline · clearingpost.com↗ European Payments Council · Provision of Addresses under the EPC Payment Schemes (EPC153-22) · europeanpaymentscouncil.eu↗ J.P. Morgan · ISO 20022 migration guidance · jpmorgan.com↗ Tazapay · ISO 20022 November 2026 Structured Address Compliance Guide · tazapay.com↗ Trace Financial · ISO 20022: Structured or Hybrid Addresses? · tracefinancial.com↗ Swift · Swift accepts community request to extend structured address migration for ISO 20022 payment messages · swift.com↗ European Payments Council · EPC delays address format migration timeline · europeanpaymentscouncil.eu
← All news