Reference🇪🇺 Payments in EuropeIntermediate⏱ 20 min read

🇬🇷 Payments in Greece, Cyprus, and Malta

IRIS and the instant payment acceptance required by Greek tax law, DIAS, AADE’s POS terminal–cash register link, JCC as Cyprus’s sole operator, Malta as a PSD2 licensing hub, and what tourism means for multicurrency acceptance

Three markets, one currency, three acceptance economies

Greece, the Republic of Cyprus, and Malta are three distinct payment acceptance markets, united by their currency and divided by their infrastructure. Greece adopted the euro on January 1, 2001, Cyprus and Malta on January 1, 2008. Monetary convergence did not bring any convergence in how payments are accepted. In Greece, payment acceptance is driven by the tax authority, and the national instant rail is mandatory for every merchant. In Cyprus, card acquiring runs through a single operator owned by the country’s banks. Malta issues EU licenses to companies that process almost nothing in its own retail market. The “Southern Europe” label therefore covers no shared model of acceptance.

GreeceCyprusMalta
Euro sinceJanuary 1, 2001January 1, 2008January 1, 2008
Central bankBank of GreeceCentral Bank of CyprusCentral Bank of Malta
Payment institution licensingBank of GreeceCentral Bank of CyprusMalta Financial Services Authority (MFSA)
Retail interbank infrastructureDIAS Interbanking Systems (1989)JCC Payment Systems (1989) for cardsNo dedicated domestic operator; SEPA rails
Flagship domestic railIRIS (DIAS, 2018)JCCsmart for bill payments and the public sectorNone
Domestic card schemeNoneNoneNone
Tourist arrivals, 202537.98M inbound travelers (Bank of Greece)4,534,073 tourists (CyStat)4,022,310 tourists (NSO Malta)
The three markets side by side
67 %
cash share of point-of-sale payments by number in Malta in 2024, the highest in the euro area
ECB, SPACE 2024 study
48 %
cash share at the point of sale in Greece in 2024; cards account for 43%
ECB, SPACE 2024 study
52 % / 39 % / 6 %
euro area average in 2024: cash, cards, mobile devices
ECB, SPACE 2024 study
1989
year DIAS was founded in Greece and JCC in Cyprus
DIAS; JCC Payment Systems

A domestic card scheme is a national acceptance network with its own rules and its own fee schedule, onto which local transactions can be routed. None of the three countries has one, so Visa and Mastercard carry nearly all card volume, with no local competitor to put pressure on scheme fees. This directly affects the cost structure, because there is no equivalent of the domestic routing used in France, Italy, or Portugal. The negotiating levers are the acquirer margin and the payment method mix, not the choice of network, since no local scheme can take over from Visa or Mastercard on a domestic transaction. The cost difference between two merchants comes down to their acquiring contracts and the share of non-card rails in their payment volume.

🔑
A single currency does not make a single acceptance market
The three countries share the same currency, the same EU Regulation 2024/886, and the same SEPA schemes, yet their acceptance chains are not interchangeable. In Greece, a provider that is not connected to the tax reporting system cannot be deployed, whatever its product features. In Cyprus, an international acquirer that does not go through JCC cannot reach bill payments or the public sector, both of which are concentrated on the JCCsmart portal. In Malta, a license comes through faster than a bank account can be opened: the first depends on the regulator, the second on a commercial bank.

DIAS, the hub of Greek interbank payments

DIAS Interbanking Systems S.A. operates Greece’s automated clearing house for retail payments. It was founded on June 15, 1989, by 14 commercial banks. The Bank of Greece and the European Central Bank oversee the system. Its shareholders include the Bank of Greece, Greek credit institutions, and payment service providers such as Alpha Bank, Eurobank, Piraeus Bank, National Bank of Greece, and Euronet. All of the country’s retail interbank flows pass through DIAS.

  • DIAS Payment Service: interbank credit transfers, including bulk payments by businesses and public bodies.
  • DIAS Direct Debit: domestic and SEPA direct debits.
  • Instant Payments: instant settlement based on the SEPA Instant Credit Transfer scheme.
  • IRIS: alias-based instant payments, offered through three channels (consumers, professionals, and retail).
  • RF/QR Payments: bill payment by structured reference or QR code, widely used for recurring bills and public bodies.
  • DIAS ATM: switching for interbank ATM withdrawals.
  • POS / ePOS: acceptance services connected to the providers in the market.
540.4M
transactions processed by the DIAS system in 2025, up 15.7% year over year
DIAS, 2025 statistics
€544.4B
value cleared in 2025, about 2.2 times Greek GDP and an all-time record
DIAS, 2025 statistics
6M
transactions worth €3.5 billion on November 24, 2025, the year’s peak day
DIAS, 2025 statistics
235/s
record instant transactions per second, reached on December 14, 2025
DIAS, 2025 statistics
38,6 %
share of RF/QR payments and standing orders in the system’s total transactions in 2025
DIAS, 2025 statistics
98M
business and institutional payments in 2025, or 18.1% of the total
DIAS, 2025 statistics

The RF reference is a structured identifier that the creditor prints on its invoice and the payer enters when making the payment. Each incoming payment therefore carries its own matching key. Nearly four in ten transactions use an RF reference or a QR code rather than a manually entered IBAN. Bank reconciliation in Greece therefore relies largely on an identifier supplied by the payer. When the billing system does not generate a reference in the expected format, payments arrive without that key and have to be matched by hand, line by line. A software vendor used to letting payers type in an IBAN and a free-text description will inevitably produce payments like these.

ℹ️
One operator, two roles
DIAS plays two distinct roles: clearing infrastructure and owner of the IRIS scheme. Oversight of the system lies with the Bank of Greece and the European Central Bank, while DIAS operates the instant rail. This division of roles still leaves the market with a single technical entry point. DIAS sets IRIS’s specifications, limits, and cross-border rollout timeline, and payment providers apply them without being able to change them. Any commitment an acquirer makes about how the service will evolve therefore concerns its own connection, not the scheme rules.

IRIS: the alias-based instant rail and its three channels

IRIS is the alias-based instant payment service that DIAS has operated since 2018, built on the SEPA Instant Credit Transfer scheme. The payer identifies the payee by phone number or tax ID instead of an IBAN. The debit and credit become irrevocable within seconds. No card number is transmitted, no mandate is stored, and no chargeback-style dispute exists. The service comes in three channels, each with its own use cases and enrollment process.

ChannelUse caseEnrollmentWhat a business must check
IRIS P2PPerson-to-person transfers by phone numberThe consumer’s banking appOutside merchant scope, but it drives adoption: 4.3M registered users
IRIS P2ProPayment from a consumer to a professional or self-employed personThe professional registers with their bankLinked to the tax ID; payments received feed directly into revenue reporting
IRIS CommerceIn-store and online paymentsIntegrated by the acquirer or payment providerPOS terminal and cash register integration; option of real-time settlement or consolidated D+1 settlement
IRIS’s three channels and what they mean for a merchant
An IRIS Commerce payment, end to end
Customer
Chooses IRIS at checkout
In store, the terminal displays a QR code or the cashier pushes the amount; online, an IRIS button replaces the card form
Banking app
Customer approves the payment in their bank’s interface
The payer uses their own strong customer authentication. No card data is shared with the merchant or the provider
DIAS
Routes the payment order over SCT Inst
The payer’s account is debited and the payee’s credited within seconds, with no possibility of revocation
Cash register system
Issues the receipt and sends it to AADE
Since December 1, 2025, every card or IRIS payment must go through the cash register and generate a receipt in real time
Payment provider
Pays out the funds to the merchant
Immediate settlement to the account, or consolidation into a single amount on the next business day, depending on the option chosen (Worldline Greece, 2026)
122.1M
instant payments processed by DIAS in 2025, up 72.8% year over year
DIAS, 2025 statistics
126.4M
IRIS transactions across all channels in 2025
DIAS, 2025 statistics
€10.9B
value of IRIS transactions in 2025, up 70% year over year
DIAS, 2025 statistics
583 445
professionals and self-employed people registered on IRIS P2Pro at the end of 2025; their volumes rose 197%
DIAS, 2025 statistics
≈ 1.2M
POS terminals and 70,000 online stores covered by IRIS Commerce
DIAS, 2025 statistics
4.3M
IRIS users registered at the end of 2025, including 836,000 new users during the year
DIAS, 2025 statistics
⚠️
Limits make IRIS a low-value rail
When the mandate took effect, transfers to an individual or a professional were limited to €500 per transaction and €1,000 per day. An increase to €1,000 per day and €5,000 per month was announced for consumers (Greek City Times, November 2025). IRIS therefore does not replace cards for large purchases. Sales of home appliances, travel, and furniture still rely on the card chain. The substitution observed is in low-ticket payments, the segment where interchange and fixed fees make up the largest share of acceptance costs.

Since June 30, 2026, IRIS has opened beyond Greece through the EuroPA alliance, which links national account-to-account payment solutions. The network brings together Bizum in Spain, MB WAY in Portugal, and BANCOMAT Pay in Italy, joined by Vipps MobilePay. The first phase covers only person-to-person transfers by phone number; merchant payments will come later. Until that second phase opens, the alliance has no effect on merchant acceptance. A Spanish or Italian visitor cannot pay for a purchase in Greece this way.

Mandatory acceptance: cards first, then instant payments

In Greece, the obligation for businesses to accept certain payment methods was introduced through tax legislation, and tax law still governs it. Article 65 of Law 4446/2016 requires categories of businesses, designated by ministerial decision, to accept card payments. The list grew until it covered all economic activities, and then the nature of the obligation changed. It now covers not only which instrument is accepted but also the traceability of revenue. Connecting the terminal to the cash register and to the tax authority has become a condition for doing business. The aim is tax collection: payments that bypass this circuit stay out of the records sent to the authority. That is why the obligation, which first targeted cards alone, was extended to instant payments.

2016
Law 4446/2016, Article 65
Obligation to accept cards for categories of businesses set by ministerial decision.
September 29, 2023
POS terminal registry opens
Every terminal must be registered on the myAADE portal. The tax authority knows the installed base, device by device.
December 2023
Law 5073/2023
Under the heading “Measures to combat tax evasion,” the POS terminal–cash register link becomes mandatory, under AADE Governor decisions A.1098/2022 and A.1155/2023.
February 29, 2024
General deadline for the POS terminal–cash register link
Payment systems must communicate with the cash register and with AADE’s systems.
September 30, 2024
Deadline for ERP-based cash registers
Extension granted for setups where the cash register system is driven by ERP software (decision A.1155/2023).
November 1, 2025
IRIS acceptance becomes mandatory
Article 65 of Law 4446/2016, combined with Article 215 of Law 5222/2025 and the implementing decisions.
December 1, 2025
Enforcement begins
In practice, the timeline slips by one month. Every payment, whether by card or IRIS, must go through the cash register system and generate a receipt in real time.
ViolationLiable partyAmount
IRIS not accepted, single-entry bookkeepingBusiness€10,000
IRIS not accepted, double-entry bookkeepingBusiness€20,000
Town with fewer than 500 residents, or island with fewer than 3,100 residentsBusinessAbove amounts cut in half
Failure to upgrade the terminal basePayment system provider€100,000 to €300,000
Terminal not upgradedPayment system provider€500 per device
Penalties under the Greek framework (published amounts)
⚠️
In Greece, choosing a payment provider means choosing a tax compliance setup
The connection does not require new hardware. Compliance is a software matter: the software layer must communicate with AADE and support IRIS. A foreign payment provider, even one licensed in the EU and passported, cannot be deployed as is for a Greek entity. Due diligence covers its certification under the AADE framework and the cash register system versions it supports. The companies that publicize their IRIS integration are the ones already active in the market: Worldline Greece under the Cardlink brand, Nexi, and epay.

Whether the framework applies to merchants with no establishment in Greece is still debated among international providers. Adyen says the rules could also cover merchants without a local entity, but does not take a firm position. It cites a €1,500 fine under decision 119899/13-12-2023. With no settled position, the question has to be assessed entity by entity with local counsel, since a single group-wide rule cannot reflect different establishment situations. Distance selling into Greece from a foreign company does not automatically trigger the cash register obligations.

Taxation through payments: myDATA, e-invoicing, and mandatory electronic spending

myDATA is AADE’s platform for receiving the books and invoicing documents of Greek businesses. The POS terminal–cash register link feeds each transaction into it as it happens, so payment, receipt, and tax reporting form a single chain. B2B e-invoicing closes the loop for business-to-business transactions. Each payment generates the tax document the moment it occurs, instead of being reported in a return prepared after the fact.

  • Legal basis for e-invoicing: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/502 of February 25, 2025, authorizing Greece to derogate from Articles 218 and 232 of Directive 2006/112/EC. The derogation runs from July 1, 2025, to December 31, 2027.
  • Phase 1 (March 2, 2026): businesses with gross revenue above €1 million in fiscal year 2023.
  • Phase 2 (October 1, 2026): all other businesses established in Greece.
  • Mechanism: the B2B invoice is sent to myDATA, which assigns it a unique identifier. It is a clearance model, with validation before issuance.
  • Out of scope: transactions with taxable persons established in another member state remain subject to optional e-invoicing; businesses that are only VAT-registered in Greece, with no establishment there, are in principle excluded from the domestic mandate.

The framework also reaches consumers. Under the income tax code, Greek taxpayers must show electronic spending equal to 30% of their actual income, with the requirement capped at €20,000 a year. Any shortfall is taxed: 22% of the gap is added to the tax due (PwC, Worldwide Tax Summaries, Greece). Greek consumers therefore have a direct tax incentive to pay by card or IRIS, and that incentive acts on them before it acts on merchants.

🔑
The Greek tax authority watches the receipt
The tax authority treats the payment method as the trigger for the tax document, not as the object of its audits. A payment whose funds did arrive but that produced no time-stamped receipt sent to AADE is a violation. The Greek chain is therefore organized around the cash register, whereas a head of payments usually tracks authorization and then settlement.
SymptomLikely causeWhere to check
Tax penalty on the Greek entityTerminal not registered in the myAADE registry, or POS terminal–cash register link brokenPOS terminal registry on myAADE; cash register system software version
Payment collected with no receipt issuedThe payment flow bypasses the cash registerIntegration chain between the provider, the cash register software, and AADE
IRIS unavailable onlineThe provider has not enabled IRIS Commerce on the online storeAcquirer contract and configuration; requirement in force since December 1, 2025
Bank reconciliation unmanageableRF/QR payments received without a compliant reference having been issuedFormat of references on invoices and payment notices
B2B invoice rejectedNo unique myDATA identifierBilling system connection to myDATA, depending on the applicable phase
What breaks in Greece, and where to look

Cyprus: JCC, the single gateway for acceptance

JCC Payment Systems Ltd, founded in 1989, handles acquiring, clearing, and settlement of card transactions for the Cypriot market, a position with no equivalent in Western Europe. It is owned by local banks: Bank of Cyprus holds control, alongside Hellenic Bank, Alpha Bank Cyprus, National Bank of Greece (Cyprus), and AstroBank. The Central Bank of Cyprus oversees the JCC card system. An international acquirer can enter the market, but without JCC’s bank shareholders or its connections to public administrations.

  • Acquiring and processing: authorizations from issuers, plus clearing and settlement of Visa, Mastercard, and Diners Club International transactions under license.
  • Multi-brand acceptance: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Diners Club, UnionPay, and JCB, useful coverage for a highly diverse tourist customer base.
  • JCC Gateway: e-commerce gateway with payment links and QR code payments.
  • Tap to Pay on Android: contactless acceptance on a phone, with no dedicated terminal.
  • Dynamic Currency Conversion: DCC is built into the merchant offering.
  • Ancillary services: SEPA direct debits, ATM management, gift cards, installment payments, and the myLOYALTY loyalty program.

JCCsmart.com, the bill payment portal operated by JCC, is the second pillar of its business. Cypriots use it to pay bills, subscriptions, and public charges. More than 800 registered organizations are connected (JCC), including local authorities, water utilities, sewer services, and government agencies. Recurring bills in Cyprus are paid through this channel. A provider entering this segment would have to build an equivalent biller directory and shift an entrenched payment habit.

1 697 803
debit cards in circulation in Cyprus in 2024
Central Bank of Cyprus, 2024 data (via Statista)
311 963
credit cards in circulation in Cyprus in 2024
Central Bank of Cyprus, 2024 data (via Statista)
≈ €14.6B
value of card payments in Cyprus in 2024, up about €2 billion since 2022
Central Bank of Cyprus, 2024 data (via Statista)
800+
billing organizations connected to the JCCsmart portal
JCC Payment Systems, 2026
⚠️
Concentration: a single point of failure
Card acquiring in Cyprus relies on a single operator owned by the banks it serves, which has two consequences for a multi-country merchant. First, business continuity depends on one supplier: there is no domestic failover if something goes wrong. Second, price negotiations take place with no credible local alternative. The only fallback is routing to a foreign acquirer, at the cost of losing integration with the Cypriot banking landscape. Reducing this exposure therefore requires a second acquirer, necessarily cross-border, with JCC remaining in place for the domestic market.
ℹ️
The part of the island outside the euro chain
The areas of Cyprus not under the effective control of the Republic use the Turkish lira. They fall outside the euro, SEPA, and the acceptance chains described in this guide. Any market analysis, terminal coverage calculation, or currency configuration must therefore treat the two areas separately. Data published by the Central Bank of Cyprus cover only the territory administered by the Republic.

Malta: a licensing hub with a tiny retail market

Malta’s payments sector consists mainly of institutions licensed there that do business elsewhere. The island’s retail market is the most cash-reliant in the euro area, while these institutions process flows that never touch Malta. The Malta Financial Services Authority licenses financial institutions under the Financial Institutions Act and is the jurisdiction’s single regulator. The institutions then passport their services across the European Economic Area. A Maltese license is therefore a way to operate in other EEA markets, not to serve local commerce.

36 / 30
e-money institutions and payment institutions licensed by the MFSA as of March 2025
CSB Group, based on MFSA registers, March 2025
+43 %
increase in PSD2 and e-money license applications in Malta between 2022 and 2024, bucking the European decline
EBA peer review on authorizations, 2022–2024, cited by BDO Malta (2025)
21
licenses granted by the MFSA in 2022–2024, with no refusals
EBA peer review, cited by BDO Malta (2025)
67 %
cash share at the point of sale in Malta in 2024, the highest in the euro area
ECB, SPACE 2024 study
License typeInitial capitalWhat it allows
E-money institution (EMI)€350,000E-money issuance and related payment services
Payment institution, core services€125,000Acquiring, payment execution, issuing of payment instruments
Payment institution, money remittance only€20,000Money remittance
Payment institution, telecom or IT intermediary€50,000Payment service provided through a network operator
Initial capital required by license type (PSD2 regime, applicable in Malta)

The FATF put Malta on its gray list in June 2021 and removed it in June 2022. Gray-listing signals weaknesses in a country’s anti-money laundering framework, and correspondent banks respond by tightening checks on flows from that country. The episode was costly for the sector: local press reported that about 40 licenses had been surrendered by the end of 2021 (The Shift News, November 2021). Delisting restored the jurisdiction’s regulatory standing, but correspondent banks’ due diligence policies continued to weigh on access to accounts.

⚠️
A passport is not a bank account
A large part of Malta’s economy depends on online gaming, regulated by the Malta Gaming Authority. De-risking policies lead banks to exit sectors they consider high-risk. Several banks, including Bank of Valletta, have closed online gaming operators’ accounts, and many operators now bank outside the island. HSBC has begun selling its 70% stake in HSBC Bank Malta; a joint bid of more than €204 million involving Maltese firm RS2 was withdrawn (Sigma World). Setting up a payment business in Malta therefore means treating bank access as a workstream separate from licensing, run in parallel rather than after the license is granted.

Malta is also home to a locally listed card payments software vendor, RS2 Software plc, whose platform serves acquirers and processors outside the island. The jurisdiction thus combines licensing with exported technical expertise. Malta has fewer than 600,000 residents, while the institutions licensed there serve the entire European Economic Area. That asymmetry shapes how to read the market: decisions made in Malta concern European flows, and rarely Maltese commerce.

Tourism, multicurrency, and dynamic currency conversion

All three markets receive far more visitors each year than their populations would suggest. A large share of the cards presented is therefore issued outside the euro area, often outside the European Economic Area. Where a card comes from affects acceptance costs and the fraud profile. The seasonal concentration of visitors affects cash flow timing. Pricing based on a domestic mix can miss the real cost by several tenths of a percentage point, and the gap is widest in the peak months.

37.98M
inbound travelers to Greece in 2025, up 5.6%; non-EU arrivals up 10%
Bank of Greece, 2025 travel services balance
€23.6B
Greece’s travel receipts in 2025, vs. €21.6 billion in 2024
Bank of Greece, 2025 travel services balance
4 534 073
tourists in Cyprus in 2025 (+12.2%); the UK accounts for 31.8% and Israel for 13.0%
CyStat, 2025 tourism statistics
4 022 310
inbound tourists in Malta in 2025 (+12.9%), including 841,397 from the UK
NSO Malta, Inbound Tourism, December 2025

The large share of British visitors to Cyprus and Malta feeds directly into acceptance costs. Since Brexit, a UK-issued card is a non-EEA card, and the IFR interchange caps no longer apply to it. Interregional interchange is capped under the commitments Visa and Mastercard made to the European Commission in 2019: 0.2% and 0.3% for card-present transactions, and 1.15% and 1.50% for card-not-present. At a Cypriot hotel that earns a third of its revenue from British cards, remote bookings paid with those cards fall under the interregional caps. A Nicosia business serving local customers, by contrast, remains fully within the scope of the IFR.

TopicGreeceCyprusMalta
Largest source market outside the euro areaNon-EU visitors up 10% in 2025UK (31.8%), Israel (13.0%)UK (841,397 visitors)
Currencies to configureGBP, USD, ILS depending on season and islandGBP and ILS, structurallyGBP, structurally
Dynamic currency conversionOffered by major acquirersBuilt into the JCC offeringOffered by international acquirers
Cash flow seasonalityVery pronounced, concentrated on the islandsPronounced, softened by winter tourismPronounced, softened by online gaming
Domestic rail that can replace cardsIRIS, but limited to Greek bank accountsNone for visitorsNone
How the tourist mix changes the acceptance picture
⚠️
IRIS does not serve tourists
IRIS relies on an alias linked to a payment account held at a Greek bank, which foreign visitors do not have. The acceptance mandate therefore burdens merchants without bringing in tourist spending. On an island with many foreign visitors, the one-time cost of integrating IRIS is incurred for payment volume limited to local residents. The return on that investment must be calculated on that share of revenue alone.
ℹ️
DCC disclosure rules apply here too
With dynamic currency conversion, a foreign cardholder pays in the currency of their own account, and the conversion happens at the point of sale. Regulation (EU) 2019/518 requires the markup over the European Central Bank reference rate to be displayed when the cardholder chooses the currency. DCC remains a revenue source for the acceptance chain, with a share passed back to the merchant. It is also a recurring cause of disputes. Offering it to British customers means documenting the cardholder’s explicit choice, or the merchant’s share may be eaten up by chargebacks.

Operating across the three markets

The three countries share the euro, the SEPA schemes, and EU payments law, but no acceptance chain. No single contract covers all three. A regional rollout splits into three projects, with three timelines, three counterparts, and three definitions of what “compliant” means. Greece stands apart: the provider’s certification under the tax framework determines whether it can collect payments at all, before any discussion of pricing or features.

🇬🇷
Greece: check certification before pricing
The provider must be integrated with the AADE framework and support IRIS Commerce, mandatory since December 1, 2025. Fines range from €10,000 to €20,000 depending on the bookkeeping regime. Negotiate pricing only after that.
🇨🇾
Cyprus: measure your dependence on JCC
Domestic acquiring and bill payment run through JCC Payment Systems, owned by the country’s banks. Line up a second, cross-border acquirer for continuity, and treat the island’s two currency areas separately.
🇲🇹
Malta: handle the bank account separately
The MFSA issues licenses quickly: it granted 21 in 2022–2024, with no refusals. Local bank access remains the sticking point, especially for flows linked to online gaming. Run both workstreams in parallel.
🧾
All three: recalculate acceptance costs
No domestic scheme, so no card routing to optimize. The tourist mix brings in non-EEA cards, whose interregional interchange reaches 1.15% and 1.50% for card-not-present sales.
  • Map the Greek terminal base in the myAADE registry before any migration: a terminal that is not registered, or is registered to a former provider, blocks compliance.
  • Treat the cash register as a payment component in Greece. User acceptance testing covers the receipt issued, not just the authorization obtained.
  • Size IRIS for low-ticket payments: limits of €500 per transaction and €1,000 per day when the mandate took effect, with an increase announced for consumers.
  • Build RF/QR references into Greek invoicing: together with standing orders, they account for nearly 39% of DIAS system transactions, and reconciliation depends on them.
  • Put DCC terms in the contract in Cyprus and Malta, and track the dispute rate, since British customers are overexposed to this product.
  • In Malta, keep the licensing process separate from the banking process: the first moves fast, the second determines the go-live date.
  • Prepare for Greek e-invoicing: phase 1 on March 2, 2026, for businesses with 2023 revenue above €1 million, and phase 2 on October 1, 2026, for all others.
🔑
The Greek precedent is worth watching closely
Greece is the only European country to require merchants to accept instant payments, and it did so through tax law rather than payments law. EU Regulation 2024/886 requires payment service providers to offer instant credit transfers but places no obligation on merchants. Greek volumes reached 122.1 million instant payments in 2025, up 72.8% (DIAS). Another member state wanting to replicate the model would write it into its own tax legislation, without waiting for EU payments law to change.