Stablecoins for payments. 6 chapters and a final quiz.
USDT, USDC, EURC, PYUSD: how a stablecoin really works (issuance, reserves, redemption), what MiCA and the GENIUS Act change, and where the advantage is proven (cross-border B2B, settlement, remittances, AI agent payments). How money moves on and off chain. And why Visa, Mastercard, and PayPal decided not to sit on the sidelines.
Explain the full mechanics of a backed stablecoin: issuance (minting), reserve composition, attestations, and redemption at par
Compare USDT, USDC, EURC, and PYUSD: issuers, reserves, blockchains, supply outstanding, and regulatory status
Understand the operational consequences of the two major regulatory frameworks: MiCA in Europe (2024) and the GENIUS Act in the US (2025)
Identify the use cases with proven value: cross-border B2B treasury, scheme settlement, remittances, and AI agent payments
Chapter 1. The mechanics: issuance, reserves, redemption.
A stablecoin is a token issued on a public blockchain whose value is pegged to a fiat currency, almost always the dollar. Unlike bitcoin, it does not promise to gain value. It promises to be worth exactly 1 unit of the reference currency at all times. Three pillars support that promise: controlled issuance, reserves covering 100% of the tokens in circulation, and a right of redemption (repayment at par) that holders can exercise with the issuer.
🔑
The stablecoin's implicit contract
A backed stablecoin is neither central bank money nor an insured bank deposit. It is a claim on a private issuer. It is only as solid as its reserves and its legal ability to pay out, and that principle drives both the analysis of any stablecoin and its regulation.
Lifecycle: from bank transfer to token and back
Institutional client
Wires $10M to the issuer's bank account
After full KYC/AML onboarding (direct clients only)
➜
Issuer (Circle, Tether…)
Mints 10M tokens and sends them to the client's wallet
Tokens outstanding rise by the same amount, and so do reserves
The vast majority of holders have no relationship with the issuer
➜
Institutional client
Sends 10M tokens back to the issuer (redemption)
The tokens are burned and the client receives $10M in fiat
Reserves: the real balance sheet behind the token
The large issuers now hold their reserves mainly in short-term US Treasury bills, repurchase agreements (repo), and cash. Circle keeps most USDC reserves in the Circle Reserve Fund, an SEC-registered money market fund managed by BlackRock. An audit firm (Deloitte) publishes monthly attestations on it, while Tether publishes quarterly attestations (BDO). At the end of 2025, Tether's Treasury exposure exceeded $100 billion. That holding ranks the issuer among the world's 20 largest holders of US debt, ahead of many countries. This massive investment in short-term debt explains why the business is so profitable: Tether reported $13 billion in net profit in 2024 with a few hundred employees.
USDC (Circle)
USDT (Tether)
US Treasury bills and repo
≈ 85–90% via the Circle Reserve Fund (BlackRock)
Most of the assets (> $100B in Treasury exposure)
Cash at banks
≈ 10–15%, spread across global systemically important banks (GSIBs)
Minority share
Other assets
None (liquid-assets-only policy)
Gold, bitcoin, secured loans, and investments (a small but contested share)
Verification
Monthly attestation (Deloitte) + annual audit
Quarterly attestation (BDO), no full audit published
Direct redemption
Institutional clients, at par
Direct clients, $100,000 minimum, 0.1% fee
Indicative reserve composition (published attestations, end of 2025)
⚠️
An attestation is not an audit
An attestation is a snapshot at a point in time: a firm confirms that the reported assets existed on the reference date. A full audit examines internal controls, off-balance-sheet commitments, and the company's ability to continue as a going concern. Neither of the two giants published a full audit before 2025, and MiCA and the GENIUS Act are pushing all regulated issuers toward real audits. In a risk review, always ask exactly which document you are looking at.
Why the peg holds: arbitrage
On the secondary market, nobody “defends” the price around the clock, and arbitrage alone holds the peg. If the token trades at $0.995, an arbitrageur buys it and redeems it at par with the issuer, pocketing the difference, which pushes the price back up. If it trades at $1.005, the arbitrageur mints tokens at $1 and sells them. The peg holds as long as redemption is credible, fast, and frictionless. Once the market doubts the issuer's reserves or its banking access, arbitrage seizes up and a depeg becomes possible. We come back to this in chapter 6.
≈ $300B
total stablecoin market cap at the end of 2025 (≈ $130B at the end of 2023)
DeFiLlama, Dec. 2025
≈ 99 %
share of stablecoins denominated in US dollars
BIS / DeFiLlama, 2025
$27.6T
gross on-chain volume in 2024, a figure to treat with caution: $5T to $7T in adjusted “organic” volume, excluding bots
CEX.io 2025 / Visa Onchain Analytics
$1.6T
projected supply outstanding in 2030 (base case)
Citi GPS, April 2025
🎯 Quick question
In practice, what keeps a backed stablecoin trading around $1 on the secondary market?
Chapter 2. The big four: USDT, USDC, EURC, PYUSD.
The stablecoin market is an oligopoly: two dollar tokens account for most of the supply, while euro tokens are still in their infancy. Any payments professional choosing a settlement asset needs a precise profile of each issuer: legal status, reserves, supported chains.
Issuers and their ecosystemsTETetherCICirclePayPalEthereumSOSolanaCOCoinbase
USDT
USDC
EURC
PYUSD
Issuer
Tether (group based in El Salvador)
Circle (listed on the NYSE since June 2025)
Circle
Paxos Trust for PayPal
Launch
2014
2018
2022 (formerly EUROC)
August 2023
Supply outstanding, end of 2025
≈ $180B
≈ $75B
A few hundred million euros
Around $1B
Currency
USD
USD
EUR
USD
Regulatory status
Outside MiCA (withdrawn from the EEA); USA₮ announced for the regulated US market
MiCA-compliant (French EMI license, July 2024) + GENIUS framework
MiCA-compliant, issued from France
Regulated by NYDFS (New York trust company)
Main chains
Tron, Ethereum
Ethereum, Solana, Base + a dozen others
Ethereum, Solana, Base
Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum
Strength
Global liquidity, emerging markets
Compliance, institutional integrations
The only liquid euro token from a major issuer
PayPal/Venmo distribution (400M+ accounts)
Profiles of the four stablecoins (data as of end of 2025)
🌍
USDT, the offshore dollar
Ubiquitous on Tron in emerging-market corridors (Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America), USDT serves as a de facto dollar for millions of users who have no dollar account. Its profits are at record levels, but its transparency has long drawn criticism, and it deliberately exited the regulated European market.
🏛️
USDC, the institutional dollar
The default choice for banks, PSPs, and card schemes: highly liquid reserves, monthly attestations, and licenses on both sides of the Atlantic. Circle's IPO (NYSE, June 2025) completed its move into mainstream finance.
🇪🇺
EURC, the euro in search of scale
The first MiCA-compliant euro token from a major issuer, but its supply is tiny next to the dollar tokens, because the vast majority of global crypto liquidity trades in USD. Competition is coming from Société Générale-FORGE's EURCV and from the euro stablecoin that a consortium of nine banks (ING, UniCredit…) announced in September 2025, expected sometime in 2026.
💳
PYUSD, the distribution stablecoin
Issued by Paxos under NYDFS supervision, PYUSD matters less for its supply than for its distribution channel. PayPal has plugged it into Xoom (remittances), merchant settlement, and a rewards program for holders, a full-scale test of a consumer stablecoin.
2014
Tether launches
The first dollar-backed stablecoin (originally called Realcoin), designed to move dollars between exchanges.
2018
USDC
Circle and Coinbase launch USDC through the Centre consortium, positioned on compliance from day one.
2022
EUROC becomes EURC
Circle extends its model to the euro. Supply will remain modest, for lack of an on-chain euro ecosystem.
August 2023
PYUSD
PayPal becomes the first major payments fintech to issue its own stablecoin (through Paxos), which expands to Solana in 2024.
June 2025
Circle lists on the New York Stock Exchange
Circle's IPO (ticker: CRCL) marks the arrival of stablecoin issuers in traditional public markets.
Sept. 2025
European banks fight back
Nine banks (ING, UniCredit, CaixaBank, KBC…) announce a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin, expected in 2026.
ℹ️
Why does the euro account for only ~1%?
Three structural reasons. Global crypto liquidity has always been dollar-based. US interest rates made Treasury-backed reserves highly profitable for issuers. And until MiCA, no clear framework encouraged a serious European player to enter the market. This imbalance, a creeping on-chain dollarization, worries the ECB and fuels the digital euro project (see the dedicated course).
🎯 Quick question
Who is the legal issuer of PayPal's PYUSD stablecoin?
Chapter 3. Regulation: MiCA in Europe, the GENIUS Act in the US.
Between mid-2024 and mid-2025, stablecoins went from the Wild West to a regulated asset in the world's two largest financial markets. Europe moved first with MiCA, and the US followed with the GENIUS Act. The two laws converge on substance: 100% reserves, redemption at par, supervision. They diverge on points that determine who can operate where.
June 2023
MiCA is published
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets is published in the Official Journal of the EU.
June 30, 2024
MiCA: stablecoin rules apply
Titles III and IV apply. E-money tokens (EMTs) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) must be issued by licensed entities.
July 1, 2024
Circle, first to be licensed
Circle obtains an e-money institution license in France (from the ACPR) and issues USDC and EURC from Paris in compliance with MiCA.
Dec. 30, 2024
MiCA in full + travel rule
Licensing of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) and extension of the travel rule (Transfer of Funds Regulation, TFR) to crypto-asset transfers.
March 31, 2025
USDT delisted in the EEA
Under pressure from ESMA, major exchanges (Binance, Kraken…) complete the delisting of USDT for clients in the European Economic Area. Coinbase had already dropped the token in December 2024.
July 18, 2025
GENIUS Act signed
After passage in the Senate (June 17) and the House (July 17), the US president signs the first federal law dedicated to payment stablecoins.
Dimension
MiCA (EU, 2024)
GENIUS Act (US, 2025)
Who can issue
E-money institution (EMI) or credit institution licensed in the EU
“Permitted payment stablecoin issuers”: subsidiaries of insured banks, nonbanks licensed by the OCC, or a state regime if supply outstanding < $10B
Reserves
100%, in safe, liquid, segregated assets; bank deposit requirements for EMTs
100% in cash, insured deposits, T-bills of 93 days or less, overnight repo, government money market funds
Transparency
White paper, reporting, supervision by ACPR/BaFin… and by the EBA for significant tokens
Monthly disclosure of reserve composition, certified by the CEO and CFO; annual audit above $50B
Interest paid to holders
Prohibited for EMTs
Prohibited (the issuer pays no interest to holders)
Specific safeguard
Caps on non-euro tokens used as a means of exchange: above 1M transactions and €200M a day, issuance must stop
Equivalence regime for foreign issuers, at the Treasury's discretion; transition of about three years for the secondary market
Philosophy
Protect the euro's monetary sovereignty
Embrace the dollar stablecoin as a tool of influence and a source of demand for US debt
MiCA vs. the GENIUS Act, side by side for payments professionals
🔑
EMT: legally, a stablecoin is e-money
Under MiCA, a stablecoin backed by a single currency is an e-money token (EMT), subject to the same requirements as an e-money account: redemption at par at any time and free of charge, and safeguarded funds. For a card payments specialist, that is a useful reference point. Europe did not invent an exotic category. It brought stablecoins under the e-money law it has been applying since 2009.
⚠️
The ban on interest and how it is sidestepped
Both laws bar the issuer from paying interest to holders, so that stablecoins do not become quasi-deposits that drain funds from banks. But “rewards” programs paid by the distributor rather than the issuer, like PayPal's on PYUSD, are testing the limits of the text. The US banking lobby sees a loophole; expect litigation and regulatory clarification.
The operational consequences are already visible. Tether gave up on MiCA compliance and left the regulated European market. In September 2025, it announced USA₮, a token built for the GENIUS framework. Circle took the opposite path, getting licensed everywhere, and is reaping the institutional rewards. For a European PSP, the practical rule comes down to two points. Offer clients only MiCA-compliant EMTs, and document each token's regulatory status exactly as you would document a correspondent bank.
✅
Usable in the EEA
USDC and EURC (Circle, French EMI license), EURCV (SG-FORGE, a credit institution), and EMTs from licensed banks.
🚫
Off-limits in the EEA
USDT and any token whose issuer lacks an EMI or credit institution license. Regulated platforms completed the delisting by March 31, 2025.
🇺🇸
The US market after GENIUS
The compliance window is open. Bank issuers, OCC-licensed fintechs, and dedicated tokens (USA₮, FIUSD, USDG) are positioning themselves ahead of full implementation, expected by 2027.
🎯 Quick question
Why have major exchanges stopped offering USDT to European clients since March 31, 2025?
Chapter 4. Use cases: cross-border B2B, settlement, remittances, AI agents.
First, a misconception to clear up. Stablecoins are almost never used to buy a loaf of bread; their comparative advantage lies elsewhere. It shows wherever money has to cross borders, time zones, or weekends, and wherever the payer is not a human. Four use cases account for the proven value.
🏢
Cross-border B2B treasury
Paying a supplier or moving cash between subsidiaries in minutes, 24/7, with no chain of correspondent banks and no value dates.
🔄
Scheme and PSP settlement
Settling positions between acquirers, issuers, and networks in USDC, even on a Sunday, while Swift and cut-off times impose D+1 or D+2.
💸
Remittances
Sending $200 home for a few cents in on-chain fees, versus the 6.6% average cost recorded by the World Bank (2024).
🤖
AI agent payments
Machine-to-machine micropayments that are programmable and have no cost floor. Cards and bank transfers serve this emerging use case poorly.
Cross-border B2B: the correspondent-bank killer
A supplier payment from Europe to Asia traditionally goes through two to four correspondent banks, with stacked fees, opaque FX, and settlement in one to three business days. In stablecoins, the same payment works like this: a local on-ramp (EUR → USDC), an on-chain transfer in seconds, and an off-ramp through a licensed provider in the destination country (USDC → local currency). Specialized infrastructure providers (Bridge, acquired by Stripe, BVNK, Conduit…) are industrializing this flow for treasurers, led by the Latin America and Africa corridors. Here the stablecoin is a settlement vehicle, held for a few minutes, and the company takes on no lasting crypto exposure.
Supplier payment from Paris to Manila via stablecoin
Treasurer (Paris)
Converts €50,000 into USDC through its licensed on-ramp provider
Corporate KYC already in place, executed in minutes
➜
Blockchain (Solana or Base)
Transfers the USDC to the local partner's wallet
Finality in seconds, network fees of a few cents
➜
Local off-ramp (Manila)
Converts the USDC into Philippine pesos
Locally licensed provider, rate shown in real time
➜
Supplier
Receives the funds in a bank account or mobile wallet
Fully settled in under an hour, traceable end to end
Settlement: when Visa settles in USDC on a Sunday
Since 2021 (a Crypto.com pilot), Visa has let certain acquirers settle their positions in USDC instead of by bank transfer. In 2023, it extended the program to the Solana blockchain with acquirers Worldpay and Nuvei, and settled volumes have grown sharply since. Mastercard followed in 2025, announcing settlement in USDC, PYUSD, or FIUSD. The benefit is mundane: weekends stop being a risk and a cost, because an acquirer can settle with the network on Saturday and Sunday instead of tying up collateral until Monday.
Remittances: a yawning cost gap
6,6 %
global average cost of sending $200 through traditional channels
World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide, 2024
≈ 8 %
average cost to sub-Saharan Africa, the most expensive corridor
World Bank, 2024
< 1 %
typical cost of an end-to-end stablecoin flow (on-ramp + network + off-ramp)
Industry analyses, 2025 (licensed ramps, liquid corridors)
$685B
global remittance flows to low- and middle-income countries in 2024
World Bank, KNOMAD
Honesty matters here. The on-chain cost is negligible, but the end-to-end cost depends on the local ramps, meaning currency liquidity, the provider's license, and any cash-out. On liquid corridors (US → Mexico, Gulf → Philippines), the savings remain massive. PayPal has built on this by connecting PYUSD to its Xoom transfer service.
AI agent payments: money for machines
An AI agent buying a piece of data for $0.001 cannot open a bank account or complete 3-D Secure. Stablecoins offer exactly what it lacks: a bearer instrument that is programmable, infinitely divisible, and settles in seconds. Two building blocks shape the field. The first is x402 (Coinbase, May 2025), which revives the HTTP 402 Payment Required status code to charge for an API call in USDC. The second is AP2 (Google, September 2025), an agent payments protocol launched with more than 60 partners, which includes an x402 extension. Visa (Intelligent Commerce) and Mastercard (Agent Pay) are pushing their card rails into the same space, and the battle for the agentic economy is wide open.
x402: an API charges an agent in USDC over HTTP 402
HTTP/1.1 402 Payment Required
Content-Type: application/json
{
"x402Version": 1,
"accepts": [{
"scheme": "exact",
"network": "base",
"asset": "USDC",
"maxAmountRequired": "1000",
"payTo": "0x209693Bc6afc0C5328bA36FaF03C514EF312287C",
"resource": "https://api.example.com/premium-report",
"description": "Single access to the report (0.001 USDC)"
}]
}
-- The agent signs a matching USDC payment, replays the request
-- with the X-PAYMENT header, and receives the resource: no account,
-- no subscription, no human in the loop.
ℹ️
Why cards are poorly suited to this use case
A card authorization costs a fixed few cents and assumes a cardholder who can be authenticated, so charging a software agent $0.001 a thousand times a minute is impossible. Stablecoins have no meaningful minimum fixed cost and require no human session. In this use case alone, they create the market rather than compete with existing rails.
🎯 Quick question
What specific operational advantage does USDC settlement give Visa's partner acquirers?
Chapter 5. On- and off-ramps: moving in and out of the on-chain world.
In a stablecoin payment, the critical link is the ramp, not the blockchain itself. The on-ramp converts account money (EUR, USD) into tokens; the off-ramp does the reverse. That is where compliance (KYC, AML/CFT, travel rule), banking risk, and most of the costs are concentrated. A payments professional needs to map these ramps the same way they map their acquirers.
Anatomy of a full fiat → stablecoin → fiat flow
Payer
Funds the ramp in euros (SEPA Instant Credit Transfer, card)
Prior KYC; the travel rule (Transfer of Funds Regulation, TFR) applies to crypto transfers
➜
Licensed on-ramp (CASP/EMI)
Converts EUR → USDC and credits the designated wallet
FX spread + fees, typically 0.1% to 1%
➜
Blockchain
Moves tokens between the parties
Network fees: from a few cents (Base, Solana) to a few dollars (Ethereum when congested)
➜
Licensed off-ramp
Converts USDC → local currency
Sanctions/AML screening of addresses before conversion
➜
Recipient
Receives the funds in a bank account
The final banking link remains essential, and sometimes fragile
Four integration architectures for a PSP or merchant
⚠️
The Achilles' heel: the ramps' banking access
A ramp without a bank account converts nothing. The continuity risk in a stablecoin flow is first and foremost a banking risk. The “debanking” episodes proved it, when banks closed crypto providers' accounts, notably in the US in 2023. In any ramp due diligence, audit its partner banks, its licenses country by country, and its business continuity plan. The smart contracts come after.
Licenses: CASP under MiCA in the EU, money transmitter license or trust charter in the US, local licenses in every off-ramp corridor
Travel rule: transmitting originator and beneficiary information with transfers (TFR in Europe, FATF Recommendation 16 elsewhere)
Screening: checking addresses against sanctions lists (OFAC, EU) before any conversion, with tools such as Chainalysis or Elliptic
Reconciliation: matching on-chain events, ramp ledger entries, and bank statements, meaning three sets of records and three clocks
Accounting and tax: balance sheet classification of the token, treatment of EUR/USD exchange, how long the float is held
Float management: minimizing how long the stablecoin is held to reduce depeg risk and counterparty exposure
Key players in the integration chainStripePayPalVisaMastercardCOCoinbaseBIBinance
🎯 Quick question
In due diligence on an on/off-ramp provider, which risk does this chapter identify as the most fundamental to service continuity?
Chapter 6. Risks (depeg, AML) and the positions of Visa, Mastercard, and PayPal.
Depegs: when the promise breaks
A stablecoin never fails slowly; it depegs. Recent history offers three textbook cases with very different mechanisms, which is why you need to know all three.
May 2022
Terra/UST: the algorithmic collapse
UST, an “algorithmic” stablecoin with no real reserves (backed by the LUNA token), collapses in a week, wiping out more than $40 billion in value. Without reserve assets, stability is just a self-reinforcing equilibrium of confidence. Regulators (MiCA, GENIUS) have since excluded this model from the scope of payment stablecoins.
May 2022
USDT at $0.95
During the Terra panic, USDT briefly loses its peg. Tether honors more than $7 billion in redemptions within days and the peg recovers, proof that working redemption is the real stabilizer.
March 2023
USDC at $0.87: banking risk
$3.3 billion of Circle's reserves are frozen in the failure of Silicon Valley Bank on a Friday evening. USDC falls to $0.87 over the weekend, with redemptions closed because no banks are open. The US authorities' guarantee of deposits on Sunday evening restores the peg. Even the most transparent stablecoin remains exposed to its banks, and on weekends, arbitrage is flying blind.
⚠️
A framework for assessing depeg risk
Reviewing an issuer comes down to four questions. Where the reserves are held (segregated T-bills vs. bank deposits). Who can redeem, how fast, with what thresholds and fees. When arbitrage works (banking hours vs. 24/7). What happens under stress: redemption gates, creditor ranking, the issuer's jurisdiction. A treasurer holding a stablecoin float needs these answers in writing.
AML: the blind spot and the fix
Pseudonymity and instant transfers make stablecoins a favored vehicle for financial crime. Chainalysis estimates they account for about 63% of illicit on-chain volume (2024 report), ahead of bitcoin. But the image of a lawless zone is outdated, because centralized issuers can freeze addresses. Tether has blocked more than 2,700 addresses and helped take down the Russian exchange Garantex (March 2025, about $27 million frozen). Public blockchain traceability does the rest: every flow can be analyzed forever, which no banknote allows. The net is tightening: the travel rule (EU TFR, FATF), mandatory screening at ramps, and OFAC sanctions on mixers.
Payment giants: co-optation over denial
Facing a rail that could disintermediate them, the card networks and large PSPs chose co-optation. They are positioning themselves as the trust, acceptance, and orchestration layer on top of stablecoins, though their strategies differ in where they enter.
Company
Key moves
The strategic view
Visa
USDC settlement since 2021 (Crypto.com), extended to Solana with Worldpay and Nuvei (2023); VTAP platform for issuing banks (2024, BBVA pilot); Intelligent Commerce for agents (2025)
Defend its role as the settlement network, whatever the asset settled
Interoperability: connecting banks and fintechs to tokens without leaving the Mastercard ecosystem
PayPal
PYUSD issuance (2023, via Paxos); Xoom in PYUSD; holder rewards and “Pay with Crypto” merchant settlement (2025)
The only issuer of the group: the stablecoin as the in-house currency of an ecosystem of 400M+ accounts
Stripe
Acquisition of Bridge for $1.1B (closed in 2025); USDC payments (1.5% fee); stablecoin financial accounts in about 100 countries (2025)
Infrastructure first: selling stablecoin plumbing to every merchant and platform
Payment giants' stablecoin strategies (as of mid-2026)
$13B
net profit reported by Tether in 2024, the lifeblood of the reserve model
Tether, 2025 attestations
$1.1B
price Stripe paid for Bridge, the largest crypto acquisition by a PSP
Stripe, 2024–2025
9
European banks teaming up on a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin (announced Sept. 2025)
ING, UniCredit et al. consortium
≈ 63 %
stablecoins' share of illicit crypto volume, the flip side of their liquidity
Chainalysis, Crypto Crime Report 2024
🔑
Key takeaways on scheme positioning
If interbank settlement partly moves on-chain, value will shift to whoever guarantees trust, reversibility, acceptance, and compliance. Visa, Mastercard, and the large PSPs have long made that their business. They are betting that the settlement asset, bank transfer or USDC, matters little as long as the scheme remains the arbiter of the payment. The potential loser is the correspondent bank, not the network.
🎯 Quick question
What directly caused USDC to depeg to $0.87 in March 2023?