🎓 CoursesOverviewIntermediate⏱ 60 min

Payments in Asia: super-apps, public rails, and cross-border QR. 6 chapters and a final quiz.

An overview of payments in Asia: China’s super-app duopoly (Alipay, WeChat Pay) versus India’s public rail (UPI), ASEAN’s QR interconnections (PayNow↔PromptPay, Project Nexus), Japan and Korea, the UnionPay, JCB, and RuPay card schemes, and the lessons for Europe. Figures from NPCI, GSMA, and METI, 2024–2025.

Chapter 1. Two models: private platform vs. public rail.

Asia doesn’t have one payment model. It has two, and they are polar opposites. On one side is the private platform, where two Chinese super-apps have absorbed everyday payments. On the other is the public rail, where the Indian government built open, free infrastructure and lets banks and fintechs compete on top of it. The whole Asian payments landscape plays out in that tension.

The same gesture: a QR codethe customer scans and approvesA · The platform owns the loopB · The state owns the standardProprietary QR codereadable by one app onlythe QR codeStandard QR codeany compliant app can read itPlatform walletprepaid balance in the appthe fundsBank accountthe funds stay at the bankInternal settlemententry in the wallet's ledgersettlementSettlement on the public railcentral bank moneyThe merchant signs upfee set by the platformaccessThe merchant is already on boardprice capped by public rulesthe data stays captiveone standard, many appsinteroperability: none by defaultinteroperability: built inThe gesture is the same. The difference is who owns the rail, and therefore who sets the price.On side A, leaving the platform means losing the whole network. On side B, switching apps costs nothing.
DimensionPlatform model (China)Public rail model (India)
OperatorAnt Group (Alipay), Tencent (WeChat Pay)NPCI, a public/interbank entity
TypeClosed ecosystem, proprietary super-appOpen, interoperable infrastructure
CompetitionDe facto duopolyHundreds of apps on a single rail (UPI)
Cost to usersFree for users, funded by the ecosystemFree for P2P and small merchants
Role of the stateAfter-the-fact regulatorArchitect and owner of the rail
RiskConcentration, dependence on two playersEconomic sustainability of a free service
Two philosophies of payments in Asia
> 1B
Alipay users, the backbone of mobile payments in China
Ant Group, 2023–2024
≈18B
UPI transactions per month in India (mid-2025)
NPCI, 2025
~90 %+
of Chinese mobile payments captured by the Alipay + WeChat Pay duopoly
Market estimates, 2024
🔑
The question that shapes everything
Ownership of the rail is what separates the two models. In China, two private companies own it, and the state regulates, sometimes harshly, as when it halted Ant’s IPO in 2020. In India, the rail belongs to a public consortium, and value is created on top of it through competition. These two setups lead to two different forms of digital monetary sovereignty, and two lessons for the rest of the world.
🎯 Quick question
What distinguishes China’s mobile payment model from India’s?