🎓 CoursesMarkets & internationalIntermediate⏱ 60 min
🇨🇦
Accepting payments in Canada. 7 chapters and a final quiz.
The operating manual for the Canadian market, written for the team launching it. Route each payment flow to the right rail, work out acceptance costs from Interac’s published rate card, audit an acquiring contract against the 13 elements of the Code of Conduct, set up a pre-authorized debit without mistaking a fast experience for final settlement, place the Real-Time Rail in your plan without counting on it for revenue, configure sales tax province by province, and make a checkout compliant in Quebec.
🇨🇦
Routing each Canadian payment flow to the right rail: Interac Debit, credit card, AFT, Interac e-Transfer, or Lynx
Calculating acceptance costs from Interac’s published rate card, both card-present and online
Auditing an acquiring contract against the 13 elements of the Code of Conduct and exercising a penalty-free exit
Setting up pre-authorized debits and Interac e-Transfer with the ACSS’s deferred finality in mind
Chapter 1. Scoping the rail: five questions before you call a provider.
A merchant entering Canada often starts by picking a provider. That is the wrong order, because the country stacks two markets with different rails and different costs. On the consumer side, credit cards account for 33% of volume but 6% of value. On the business side, EFT bulk transfers account for 14% of volume and 63% of value (Payments Canada, Canadian Payment Methods and Trends, 2025 edition, 2024 data). Choose the rail first. Then choose the provider, based on its ability to connect to that rail.
The five questions, in the order they come up
1. Channel
Card present or card not present?
In Canada, the channel determines pricing more than the card itself. The same debit card runs on two different rails depending on whether it is presented or keyed in.
➜
2. Ticket size
What average amount, and how widely does it vary?
Interac debit interchange is a flat fee per transaction; credit interchange is a percentage. The break-even point therefore depends on your ticket size, not on a general rule.
➜
3. Recurrence
One-time payment or recurring mandate?
In Canada, a mandate runs as a pre-authorized debit in the AFT (Automated Funds Transfer) stream. Interac e-Transfer collects funds; it does not carry a mandate.
➜
4. Finality
When must the funds be final and irrevocable?
The ACSS settles on the morning of the next business day. Lynx settles in real time, in central bank money. In between, you carry counterparty risk.
➜
5. Province
Where does the customer live, and where do you deliver?
The province determines the sales tax, whether a surcharge is allowed, and the language of the checkout. None of these three settings belongs at the merchant account level.
What you collect
The rail
When the funds are final
The trap
In-store purchase, everyday ticket
Interac Debit first, then credit
Clearing in the ACSS, settlement the next business morning
Letting the terminal route to the card’s international application
Online card purchase
Visa, Mastercard, American Express, mobile wallets
Per the funding schedule in the acquiring contract
Writing Interac Online into the spec: the service was shut down on May 31, 2024
Online account-to-account purchase
Interac Direct, distributed through the Konek gateway
Per the acquiring contract
Assuming it is universal: coverage depends on which financial institutions participate
One-off invoice, rent, privately negotiated service
Interac e-Transfer, business version for the reconciliation data
The payee sees the funds within minutes; the interbank leg settles the next day
Treating it as an instant rail with immediate finality
Subscription, installment plan, recurring invoice
Pre-authorized debit (PAD) in the AFT
Per the AFT schedule, with a return window
Using e-Transfer: it is not a mandate instrument
Large amount, real estate, capital call
Lynx
Real-time gross settlement, in central bank money
Paying for a large-value transfer on a flow the AFT could have handled
What you collect, and the Canadian rail that carries it
33 % / 6 %
credit cards: share of volume, then share of value, Canadian retail payments in 2024
Payments Canada, Canadian Payment Methods and Trends, 2025 edition
14 % / 63 %
EFT bulk transfers (called AFT in the rules): share of volume, then share of value
Payments Canada, Canadian Payment Methods and Trends, 2025 edition
2 % / 22 %
checks and other paper items: share of volume, then share of value
Payments Canada, Canadian Payment Methods and Trends, 2025 edition
58 %
contactless share of transactions in 2024, or 13 billion transactions
Payments Canada, Canadian Payment Methods and Trends, 2025 edition
⚠️
Two outdated references that still turn up in specs
Interac Online, which let shoppers pay online through a redirect to their bank, was shut down on May 31, 2024, yet comparison sites and integration guides still list it. Online account-to-account payments now go through Interac Direct, distributed by the Konek gateway, and coverage depends on which financial institutions participate. The second outdated reference is LVTS: the large-value system has been called Lynx since 2021. A live document that uses either term has not been maintained, so audit the rest of it.
🔑
Canada’s routing rule fits in one sentence
The channel sets the cost, not the card. A Canadian debit card carries Interac for domestic card-present payments and, separately, a Visa or Mastercard application for cross-border and card-not-present payments. This is not co-badging: two distinct applications share the same card, with unrelated rate cards. A cost model built “per card” is wrong from the first line. Build it per acceptance path.
🎯 Quick question
A Canadian customer pays C$60 with the same debit card, once in store and once on your website. What happens when the payment moves online?
Chapter 2. Interac Debit: reading the rate card and routing to capture it.
Interac Corp. publishes its fee schedule in more detail than almost any other scheme. A payments manager can therefore calculate what their mix will cost in interchange before any negotiation starts. The result surprises teams from ad valorem markets: on domestic card-present debit, interchange is measured in fractions of a cent, not in percentage points.
Acceptance path
Interchange paid by the acquirer to the issuer
Surcharge to the customer
Interac Debit, chip and PIN
Set at zero
Capped at C$0.25, applied by the acquirer, never directly by the merchant
Tier 1, contactless from C$0.01 to C$100.00, small-ticket merchants (listed merchant category codes, including fast food 5814 and convenience stores 5499)
C$0.020 per transaction
Same rule
Tier 2, contactless from C$0.01 to C$100.00, at least 20 million contactless transactions in the previous calendar year
C$0.025 per transaction
Same rule
Tier 3, contactless from C$0.01 to C$100.00, all other merchants
C$0.035 per transaction
Same rule
Tier 4, contactless from C$100.01 to C$250.00, all merchants
C$0.055 per transaction
Same rule
Interac Debit online, in-app or in-browser, through Apple Pay or Google Pay
60 basis points by default, capped at C$1.80 from C$300; 57.5 and 55 basis points depending on volume and merchant category code
Prohibited on this service
Interac Direct, Konek gateway
55 to 70 basis points, plus a 10 basis point Interac brand fee
Not provided for
Interac’s published rate card, by acceptance path (Interac Corp., business fee schedule, accessed August 2026)
Worksheet: one month of sales, three paths
AVERAGE TICKET C$48.00
TRANSACTIONS IN THE MONTH 40,000
VOLUME C$1,920,000
PATH A — Interac Debit contactless, tier 3
40,000 x C$0.035 = C$1,400
i.e. 0.073%
(Interac Corp., 2026 rate card: tier 3 =
all other merchants, C$0.01 to C$100.00)
PATH B — Interac Debit online (in-app/browser)
C$1,920,000 x 0.60% = C$11,520
(default tier 1; the C$1.80 cap
above C$300 has no effect here)
PATH C — credit card, merchant below the
small-business commitment thresholds
C$1,920,000 x 0.95% = C$18,240
(Department of Finance Canada, commitments
in force since October 19, 2024)
GAP A vs C, IN A SINGLE MONTH = C$16,840
WHAT THIS CALCULATION LEAVES OUT
Interac switch fees: C$0.013985 per
transaction, rising to C$0.014438 on November 1,
2026; online acquirer service fee: C$0.025;
and your acquirer’s own fee, which is negotiable.
🔑
Your first cost lever is not negotiation
Compare paths A and C in the worksheet above: the gap comes from a shift in payment mix, not from a discount won from an acquirer. A merchant that moves 10 percentage points of revenue from credit to domestic card-present debit saves more than an annual renegotiation would. Three levers help, all legal in Canada. One: offer a discount for debit, which the Code of Conduct permits. Two: check that the terminal actually presents the Interac option. Three: manage ticket sizes around the C$100 threshold, above which the contactless flat fee rises to C$0.055.
That leaves routing, the most common leak. On a card that carries Interac and an international application, the cardholder chooses the application, not the terminal. The rule comes from element 9 of the Code of Conduct, which covers competing debit applications. A misconfigured terminal, or a checkout that presents the international application first, quietly shifts your mix to the more expensive rate card. Checking is easy. Pay in store yourself with a debit card from a major Canadian bank, and see what the screen offers first.
⚠️
A surcharge on Interac debit is not a surcharge on credit
These are two separate regimes, and system settings often confuse them. On card-present Interac Debit, the surcharge is capped at C$0.25, must appear on the receipt, and the customer can cancel the transaction at no cost if they decline it. The acquirer applies it, never the merchant directly, and if another debit network is accepted at the same point of sale, it cannot exceed that network’s surcharge. On the in-app and in-browser service, surcharging is not allowed at all. The 2.4% cap people talk about in Canada applies to credit cards only.
🎯 Quick question
Your average ticket is C$48 and you do not fall under any small-ticket merchant category code. Which Interac interchange applies to an in-store contactless payment?
Chapter 3. Credit cards: cost, surcharging, and the Code of Conduct.
Canada has no statutory interchange cap. Instead, it has voluntary commitments from Visa and Mastercard, secured by the Department of Finance under the threat of regulation and limited by a revenue threshold above which they do nothing. The most useful day-to-day tool is therefore not about price. The Code of Conduct for the Payment Card Industry in Canada is administered by the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC). It sets no prices. It sets deadlines, and deadlines become negotiating leverage.
0,95 %
average card-present credit interchange for merchants below the thresholds, since October 19, 2024
Department of Finance Canada, Visa and Mastercard commitments, 2024
C$300,000 / C$175,000
annual Visa and then Mastercard sales thresholds above which the commitments no longer apply
Department of Finance Canada, 2024
≈ 90 %
share of card-accepting merchants covered, for reductions of up to 27%
Department of Finance Canada, 2024; CFIB, 2024
2,4 %
cap on credit card surcharges, in effect since October 6, 2022, and never above the actual cost
Settlement of the class actions against Visa and Mastercard, 2022
Event
What the Code gives you
Deadline
What you need in place
Your acquirer announces a fee increase
Mandatory notice before the effective date
30 to 60 calendar days
A monitored inbox for notices, and a timestamp on every notice received
The increase takes effect
The right to terminate without penalty; the notice must state when that right expires
70 calendar days after the effective date
An alert set when the notice arrives, not when the deadline hits
A network changes its base fees without changing their structure
Notice from the network to acquirers
120 days
Monitoring of network bulletins, cross-checked against acquirer notices
A network changes its fee structure
The same notice, with a longer lead time
210 days
The same monitoring, plus a review of the merchant category code table
You file a complaint
A written acknowledgment
5 business days
A dated case file, with the merchant agreement and the statements in question
The complaint is investigated
A written, reasoned response
20 business days, or 30 business days when the network is investigating
A follow-up scheduled for the due date, with the FCAC route kept open
The Code of Conduct as a working calendar
Element 1: transparency of the merchant application, the merchant agreement, and the monthly statement. The statement is your only proof of cost, so insist that it be readable before you sign.
Element 3: penalty-free termination after an unfavorable change. It is the counterpart to the notice requirement, and it expires.
Element 4: notice of fee changes, from the acquirer to the merchant.
Element 5: limited acceptance. Accepting credit but not debit, or the reverse, is your choice.
Element 6: no negative-option acceptance. A new product is not added to your contract by default.
Element 7: rules on renewing merchant agreements and related services.
Element 8: discounts by payment method. This is the legal basis for a lower price for debit or cash.
Element 9: competing debit applications. On a card carrying Interac and an international application, the cardholder chooses.
Element 12: premium cards. They cannot be quietly imposed on the merchant.
Element 13: card identification, so checkout staff can tell which product is being presented.
✅
Every fee increase opens a dated window to go to market
Combine two rules from the table above. The notice arrives 30 to 60 days before the effective date, and penalty-free termination stays available for 70 days after it. That gives you a window, known in advance, during which leaving costs nothing. Without a process, the window closes before anyone notices it. With one, every notice triggers a market review. What separates the two outcomes is not the merchant’s size. It is a calendar alert.
The complaints route, and why you don’t have to follow it in order
Acquirer
First complaint, in writing
A summary of the issue, dates, names of the people you dealt with, and copies of the agreement and statements.
➜
Network
Escalation if the response is unsatisfactory
The networks handle complaints under the Code. Interac Corp. acknowledges receipt within 5 business days and issues a written decision within 30 business days.
➜
ACFC
Direct referral to the FCAC, at any stage
You do not have to exhaust the internal process before going to the FCAC. The networks also report the complaints they receive to the FCAC every six months.
🎯 Quick question
Your Canadian acquirer announces a fee increase effective March 1. What does the Code of Conduct let you do?
Chapter 4. Choosing an acquirer and reading the contract.
Canadian acquiring is concentrated and bank-owned. The country’s largest acquirer, Moneris, is a joint venture owned equally by Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal. Interac Corp. publishes the list of acquirers authorized to offer its point-of-sale debit service, which gives merchants a clean filter. A provider not on that list cannot give you direct Interac Debit acceptance. It will go through a third party, which will sit in your contract chain without ever appearing in your RFP.
Acquirers offering Interac Debit at the point of sale (Interac Corp., published list, 2026)INInteracMOMonerisGLGlobal Payments CanadaAdyen CanadaSquare CanadaNUNuveiELElavonFIFiserv Canada
Question
Acceptable answer
What happens without it
Are you on Interac’s list of point-of-sale acquirers?
Yes, under this exact legal name
Your domestic debit runs through a third party not named in the contract
How do you route a card that carries Interac and an international application?
The cardholder chooses, as element 9 of the Code of Conduct requires
Your mix drifts to the international rate card, with no trace on the invoice
Does the monthly statement show the interchange actually paid, per transaction?
Yes, with the network used and the card type
You cannot reproduce any of the calculations in this course
Are you registered with the Bank of Canada under the RPAA (Retail Payment Activities Act)?
Yes, under the name shown in the public registry
You cannot verify your provider’s supervisory status
How quickly do you notify us of an incident?
In line with the RPAA requirement: without delay, and within 48 hours at most
You hear about the incident from your customers
What happens to the card token vault if we leave?
Export or migration written into the contract, with a stated timeline
Migrating means every subscriber has to re-enter their card
Six questions to ask in an RFP, and the answer that protects you
📄
The agreement and the statement, before you sign
Element 1 of the Code requires the merchant application, the merchant agreement, and the statement to be readable. During the RFP, ask for a real, anonymized statement, not a sales mock-up.
🏛️
The Bank of Canada’s public registry
Since September 8, 2025, the Bank of Canada has published the registry of payment service providers registered under the RPAA, along with rejected applications. Checking takes a minute and beats a sales pitch.
⏱️
Obligations your provider already has
A registered provider must report a significant incident within 48 hours, give notice of a significant change 5 business days in advance, and file its annual report by March 31 (Bank of Canada, 2026). Tie your contract clauses to these existing deadlines.
🔓
Negotiate the exit on the way in
Card token portability, export of pre-authorized debit mandates, termination notice. The Code gives you an exit window after every increase, but you still need to be able to leave technically.
⚠️
The order of registrations sets the launch timeline
A nonbank company that wants to operate in Canada in its own right has to follow a sequence, and getting it backward costs quarters. One: register as a money services business (MSB) with FINTRAC, Canada’s financial intelligence unit, before any activity, even as a foreign company serving Canadian customers with no local presence. Two: register with the Bank of Canada under the RPAA, whose supervisory framework took effect on November 1, 2024. Three, and only then: access to the rails, through Interac e-Transfer participation and Payments Canada membership. In Quebec, you also need a money services business license issued by Revenu Québec.
🔑
The most profitable clause in a Canadian contract
“The provider reports monthly, for each transaction, the network and application used, the card type, and the interchange amount actually paid.” Without that line, you cannot reproduce the worksheet from the previous chapter, prove that a routing shift is costing you money, or spot a change in mix from one quarter to the next. Element 1 of the Code gives you the right to a readable statement; the contract clause sets its format.
🎯 Quick question
A provider offers you in-store Interac Debit acceptance but does not appear on Interac Corp.’s published list of acquirers. What should you conclude?
Chapter 5. e-Transfer, pre-authorized debit, and the Real-Time Rail.
Two thirds of the value of Canadian payments moves not by card but by bulk transfer through the AFT, which carries payroll, benefits, and direct debits. A software vendor or biller that has built only card payments covers 6% of the market’s value. Three instruments share the rest, and they are not interchangeable. The first collects, the second runs mandates, and the third is still on its way.
Instrument
What it carries
Settlement finality
Reversibility
Reconciliation
Interac e-Transfer
One-off payments, from consumers and businesses alike
Experience in minutes, clearing in the ACSS, settlement the next business morning
Very low once funds are deposited: good protection against nonpayment, but a prime target for scams
Manual in the consumer version; the business version adds remittance data
None, by design: hence mandatory centralized fraud services
Automatic: remittance data travels with the payment
Three non-card instruments, and what they actually do
Autodeposit: the payee’s alias is linked to an account in advance, so funds are credited automatically and the security question goes away. Ask your business customers to turn it on; it removes the main interception risk.
Request Money: the payee initiates and the payer approves in their banking app. It is the closest thing to request-to-pay available in Canada today.
Business version: higher limits, bulk payouts for payroll and suppliers, and richer reconciliation data. Without that data, cash application is done by hand.
Limits: each issuing institution sets its own, not the scheme. Your flow has to cope with a block you can neither see in advance nor query.
Direct participation: limited to regulated entities. A nonbank provider must be registered under the RPAA and registered as a money services business with FINTRAC.
Indirect connection: an indirect participant connects through an approved connection service provider. Interac publishes the list, which includes Central 1, Desjardins, Peoples Trust Company, and Digital Commerce Bank.
June 2023
RTR exchange component completed
Interac Corp. supplies it, and it handles the real-time exchange of payment messages.
April 2024
Program relaunched with new partners
IBM Canada becomes the lead technology partner; CGI provides advisory services.
June 30, 2026
By-law published in the Canada Gazette
The Canadian Payments Association’s By-law No. 10 (RTR) is published in Part II. The by-law and the rules have received all required approvals (Payments Canada, 2026).
Q3 2026
Solution assurance testing with participants begins
For the first time, participants connect to the system and exchange their own traffic. Two pillars are validated: enriched ISO 20022 messaging and centralized fraud prevention services, mandatory from day one (Payments Canada, July 9, 2026).
August 24, 2026
By-law and rules take effect
This text is the system’s legal foundation. It precedes the launch; it is not the launch.
Q4 2026
Target launch, with the first directly connected participants
Payments Canada has announced a deliberately phased rollout. The first participants connected directly to the exchange go live, then two successive phases migrate existing Interac e-Transfer volumes to the RTR, for real-time settlement item by item. No deadline is imposed on new participants (Payments Canada, July 9, 2026).
⚠️
Don’t count on the Real-Time Rail for 2026 revenue
Three reasons, in this order. One: the rollout is explicitly phased, and being technically ready does not guarantee a place in the first wave. Two: Interac e-Transfer volumes will migrate later, in two phases, which turns the question from “connecting to the RTR” into “tracking the migration of my current rail.” Three: the program has already been through several target dates since 2015. The prudent approach is to build today on the business version of e-Transfer and on the AFT, and to treat the RTR as a later cost and speed optimization.
C$0.08 / C$0.04
e-Transfer wholesale fee per transaction, between different institutions, then within the same institution
Interac Corp., fee schedule, accessed August 2026
35 bps, capped at C$3.50
percentage option for business request-to-pay; flat option at C$0.35 per transaction
Interac Corp., fee schedule, accessed August 2026
C$50,000 / C$5,000
one-time integration fee for a direct connection, then an indirect connection, to the e-Transfer service
Interac Corp., fee schedule, accessed August 2026
C$20,000 / C$1,500
monthly operating fee per direct connection, then per indirect connection among the first nine
Interac Corp., fee schedule, accessed August 2026
🎯 Quick question
Your Canadian customer pays an invoice by Interac e-Transfer at 4 p.m. on a Tuesday. When does the interbank transfer reach final settlement?
Chapter 6. Sales taxes: one federal, several provincial, one checkout.
Canadian sales tax is based on the customer’s address, not the seller’s: a merchant in Alberta shipping to Halifax charges the Nova Scotia rate. Three regimes coexist, each with its own administrator and its own return. Configuration is therefore done province by province, never at the account level. A setup error does not show at the point of sale; it shows at the first tax audit.
Regime
Where it applies
Rate
Administered by
Harmonized sales tax (HST), one tax and one return
Ontario; Nova Scotia; New Brunswick; Newfoundland and Labrador; Prince Edward Island
Ontario 13%; Nova Scotia 14% since April 1, 2025; the other three 15% (Canada Revenue Agency, 2026)
Canada Revenue Agency
Federal GST plus a separate provincial tax, two registrations and two returns
Quebec; British Columbia; Saskatchewan; Manitoba
GST 5% everywhere, plus QST 9.975% in Quebec (Revenu Québec, 2026), PST 6% in Saskatchewan (Government of Saskatchewan, 2026), RST 7% in Manitoba (Government of Manitoba, 2026), and provincial PST in British Columbia
Canada Revenue Agency for the GST, the province for the other tax
GST only
Alberta; Yukon; Northwest Territories; Nunavut
5 %
Canada Revenue Agency
Canada’s three sales tax regimes
The same C$100.00 order, four destinations
DISPLAYED PRICE (before tax, Canadian practice) C$100.00
ALBERTA
GST 5% 5.00
TOTAL TO AUTHORIZE 105.00
ONTARIO
HST 13% 13.00
TOTAL TO AUTHORIZE 113.00
NOVA SCOTIA (14% since April 1, 2025)
HST 14% 14.00
TOTAL TO AUTHORIZE 114.00
QUEBEC
GST 5% 5.00
QST 9.975% 9.98
TOTAL TO AUTHORIZE 114.98
WHAT THE PAYMENT ENGINE MUST REMEMBER
the authorized amount is the TOTAL, not the
displayed price; a partial refund reverses tax
at the rate of the original sale, not today’s rate.
Business number and GST/HST account. The small supplier threshold is C$30,000 in taxable sales; above it, registration is no longer optional.
Simplified regime for non-residents, in effect since July 1, 2021, for digital products and services sold to Canadian consumers above C$30,000 over 12 months. The trade-off: it gives no right to input tax credits (Canada Revenue Agency).
QST registration with Revenu Québec, under the specified registration system for suppliers outside Quebec, above the same C$30,000 threshold. The number issued carries the prefix NR.
Separate provincial registrations in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, each with its own province and its own filing calendar.
A province-to-rate lookup table in the tax engine, driven by the shipping or billing address and reviewed whenever a change is announced.
⚠️
The displayed price is not the authorized amount
Canadian retail practice displays prices before tax, with tax added at checkout. That has three consequences for a checkout flow imported from a tax-inclusive market. One: the amount sent for authorization is the total including tax, so any control that compares the authorization with the list price will throw alerts in bulk. Two: a quote, a pre-authorization, or a subscription shown before tax surprises the customer when the charge lands, which drives inquiries and disputes. Three: in Quebec, the Consumer Protection Act requires the advertised price to be the price paid, which rules out adding anything at the point of payment.
🔑
A refund reverses the original tax
Use the rate applied to the original sale, not the rate in effect on the day of the refund. Nova Scotia is a concrete example: its rate fell from 15% to 14% on April 1, 2025. An item sold before that date and refunded after it therefore reverses tax at 15%. Your tax engine must store the applied rate with the transaction rather than recalculate it on the fly. This is a database design rule, not an accounting setting.
🎯 Quick question
Your company is based in Toronto and ships to a customer in Calgary. What tax do you charge?
Chapter 7. Quebec: language, signage, and surcharging.
Quebec is not a marketing variant of the Canadian market. It has a distinct regime on three issues that directly affect payment acceptance: the language of contracts, signage, and surcharging. A Canada-wide rollout that treats Quebec like any other province creates three compliance failures at once, none of which shows up in technical acceptance testing. All three show up in an inspection.
Surface
Quebec requirement
Legal basis and date
Enforced by
Merchant agreement, terms and conditions, subscription contract
The contract of adhesion is provided in French at the same time as any version in another language
Charter of the French Language, since June 1, 2023
Office québécois de la langue française (Quebec’s language regulator)
Commercial documents and customer communications are available in French
Charter of the French Language
Office québécois de la langue française (Quebec’s language regulator)
Price display and card surcharges
The advertised price is the price paid, which leaves no room for a credit card surcharge
Consumer Protection Act
Office de la protection du consommateur (Quebec’s consumer protection agency)
Money transfers, currency exchange, check cashing
A money services business license, on top of FINTRAC registration
Money-Services Businesses Act; administration transferred on September 13, 2021
Revenu Québec
Sales tax
Separate QST registration, at 9.975%
Specified registration system for suppliers outside Quebec
Revenu Québec
The parts of a payment journey to address in Quebec
⚠️
The most common configuration error in Canada
Turning on the credit card surcharge at the merchant account level, with no rule by province. The merchant thinks it is legally passing on up to 2.4%. In fact, it is violating the Consumer Protection Act on every Quebec transaction. Enforcement will come not from the federal government or the acquirer, but from the Office de la protection du consommateur and, where applicable, from civil lawsuits. One acceptance test catches it. Place an order with a Quebec billing address and look at the fee line.
🗣️
Office québécois de la langue française (Quebec’s language regulator)
It enforces the Charter of the French Language: contracts of adhesion, commercial documents, signage, self-service screens. Your email templates and terminal screens fall within its scope.
🛡️
Office de la protection du consommateur (Quebec’s consumer protection agency)
It enforces the Consumer Protection Act, including the rule that the advertised price is the price paid. Its enforcement makes surcharging unworkable in the province.
🧾
Revenu Québec
Two unrelated matters: the QST at 9.975%, and the money services business license, whose administration was transferred to it on September 13, 2021. Two calendars, two separate processes.
🤝
The distribution network is different
Mouvement Desjardins is North America’s largest cooperative financial group, with C$470.9 billion in assets and 203 caisses (local credit unions) in Quebec as of December 31, 2024 (Desjardins, 2025). A distribution plan modeled on the Big Five banks misses the province.
Inventory every surface before you translate: payment page, terminal screens, receipt, confirmation email, pre-authorized debit notice, refund policy, complaint flow.
Set language at the order level, not the account level. A Quebec customer of an Ontario merchant is still a Quebec customer.
Make the surcharge conditional on the billing province, and test the Quebec case before going live.
Open both Revenu Québec files alongside the federal one: QST registration and, if your business requires it, the money services business license.
Date your templates. The June 1, 2025, signage requirement covers physical and software media that product teams do not naturally think of as commercial signage.
🔑
Quebec French is not just another locale
Product teams usually treat language as an interface resource: add a translation file, wire up a language picker. The Charter requires something else. First, it covers legal instruments, since the contract of adhesion must be provided in French. It also covers physical media, including terminal screens and self-service kiosks. Both categories sit outside the usual translation pipeline, and they are handled with the legal team and store operations, not through internationalization.
🎯 Quick question
You turn on a 2% credit card surcharge across your entire Canadian merchant account. What is wrong with this setup?